Values and Trust: Multilevel Analyses of the Relationship of Basic Values With General and Institutional Trust in Europe

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Alexander Tatarko, Georgi Dragolov, Klaus Boehnke
{"title":"Values and Trust: Multilevel Analyses of the Relationship of Basic Values With General and Institutional Trust in Europe","authors":"Alexander Tatarko,&nbsp;Georgi Dragolov,&nbsp;Klaus Boehnke","doi":"10.1002/ijop.70234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Existing research has not systematically examined how basic human values relate to different forms of trust, namely generalised interpersonal and institutional trust, at both the societal and individual levels. This study addresses the question: How do Openness to Change, Self-Transcendence, Conservation, and Self-Enhancement values relate to trust (generalised and institutional) at the macro and micro levels? Using data from Round 10 of the European Social Survey covering 22 European countries, we investigate these associations via a multilevel regression analysis. Our findings provide three key contributions. The first contribution of our research is that generalised and institutional trust are associated with distinct value preferences at the individual level. The second contribution is the opposing effect of conservation values on institutional trust across the societal and individual levels. Whereas the individual endorsement of conservation values is positively associated with institutional trust, in countries with a higher average endorsement of conservation values, institutional trust is lower. Third, at the country level, values have no impact on generalised or institutional trust, except for conservation values, which may hinder the growth of both types of trust. At the individual level, however, values play a crucial role for both types of trust, yet in different constellations.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48146,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychology","volume":"61 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijop.70234","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing research has not systematically examined how basic human values relate to different forms of trust, namely generalised interpersonal and institutional trust, at both the societal and individual levels. This study addresses the question: How do Openness to Change, Self-Transcendence, Conservation, and Self-Enhancement values relate to trust (generalised and institutional) at the macro and micro levels? Using data from Round 10 of the European Social Survey covering 22 European countries, we investigate these associations via a multilevel regression analysis. Our findings provide three key contributions. The first contribution of our research is that generalised and institutional trust are associated with distinct value preferences at the individual level. The second contribution is the opposing effect of conservation values on institutional trust across the societal and individual levels. Whereas the individual endorsement of conservation values is positively associated with institutional trust, in countries with a higher average endorsement of conservation values, institutional trust is lower. Third, at the country level, values have no impact on generalised or institutional trust, except for conservation values, which may hinder the growth of both types of trust. At the individual level, however, values play a crucial role for both types of trust, yet in different constellations.

价值观与信任:欧洲基本价值观与普遍信任和制度性信任关系的多层次分析。
现有的研究还没有系统地检查基本的人类价值观如何与不同形式的信任,即一般的人际信任和机构信任,在社会和个人层面。本研究解决了以下问题:在宏观和微观层面上,对变化的开放、自我超越、保守和自我提升的价值观与信任(一般的和制度的)是如何相关的?利用涵盖22个欧洲国家的第10轮欧洲社会调查的数据,我们通过多层次回归分析来调查这些关联。我们的发现提供了三个关键贡献。我们研究的第一个贡献是,在个人层面上,普遍信任和机构信任与不同的价值偏好有关。第二个贡献是保护价值观在社会和个人层面上对机构信任的相反影响。虽然个人对保护价值观的认可与制度信任呈正相关,但在平均认可保护价值观较高的国家,制度信任较低。第三,在国家层面上,价值观对普遍信任或机构信任没有影响,但保护价值观可能会阻碍这两种信任的增长。然而,在个人层面上,价值观对这两种类型的信任都起着至关重要的作用,只是在不同的星座上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Psychology
International Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Psychology (IJP) is the journal of the International Union of Psychological Science (IUPsyS) and is published under the auspices of the Union. IJP seeks to support the IUPsyS in fostering the development of international psychological science. It aims to strengthen the dialog within psychology around the world and to facilitate communication among different areas of psychology and among psychologists from different cultural backgrounds. IJP is the outlet for empirical basic and applied studies and for reviews that either (a) incorporate perspectives from different areas or domains within psychology or across different disciplines, (b) test the culture-dependent validity of psychological theories, or (c) integrate literature from different regions in the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书