SelfCheck-Eval: A multi-module framework for zero-resource hallucination detection in large language models.

IF 10.8 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Patterns Pub Date : 2026-06-05 eCollection Date: 2026-06-12 DOI:10.1016/j.patter.2026.101569
Diyana Muhammed, Giusy Giulia Tuccari, Gollam Rabby, Sören Auer, Sahar Vahdati
{"title":"SelfCheck-Eval: A multi-module framework for zero-resource hallucination detection in large language models.","authors":"Diyana Muhammed, Giusy Giulia Tuccari, Gollam Rabby, Sören Auer, Sahar Vahdati","doi":"10.1016/j.patter.2026.101569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Large language models (LLMs) have achieved considerable progress across diverse applications, yet their tendency to generate incorrect or fabricated content, commonly termed hallucinations, remains a fundamental obstacle to reliable deployment in high-stakes domains. Existing detection benchmarks are confined to general-knowledge settings, leaving specialized fields, where accuracy is important, underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce the American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) Math Hallucination dataset, a benchmark for evaluating mathematical reasoning hallucinations, and propose SelfCheck-Eval, an LLM-agnostic, black-box detection framework compatible with open- and closed-source LLMs. The framework integrates three independent modules, semantic, specialized detection, and contextual consistency, into a suitable architecture. Systematic evaluation reveals a noticeable performance gap: existing methods perform well on biographical content but struggle with mathematical reasoning, a deficit that continues across natural language inference (NLI) fine-tuning, preference learning, and process supervision paradigms. These findings expose fundamental limitations of current approaches and motivate the development of specialized, black-box-compatible methods for trustworthy LLM deployment.</p>","PeriodicalId":36242,"journal":{"name":"Patterns","volume":"7 6","pages":"101569"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13280721/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patterns","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2026.101569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved considerable progress across diverse applications, yet their tendency to generate incorrect or fabricated content, commonly termed hallucinations, remains a fundamental obstacle to reliable deployment in high-stakes domains. Existing detection benchmarks are confined to general-knowledge settings, leaving specialized fields, where accuracy is important, underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce the American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) Math Hallucination dataset, a benchmark for evaluating mathematical reasoning hallucinations, and propose SelfCheck-Eval, an LLM-agnostic, black-box detection framework compatible with open- and closed-source LLMs. The framework integrates three independent modules, semantic, specialized detection, and contextual consistency, into a suitable architecture. Systematic evaluation reveals a noticeable performance gap: existing methods perform well on biographical content but struggle with mathematical reasoning, a deficit that continues across natural language inference (NLI) fine-tuning, preference learning, and process supervision paradigms. These findings expose fundamental limitations of current approaches and motivate the development of specialized, black-box-compatible methods for trustworthy LLM deployment.

SelfCheck-Eval:一个用于大型语言模型中零资源幻觉检测的多模块框架。
大型语言模型(llm)已经在不同的应用程序中取得了相当大的进展,但是它们倾向于生成不正确或虚构的内容,通常被称为幻觉,这仍然是在高风险领域可靠部署的根本障碍。现有的检测基准仅限于一般知识设置,而对准确性很重要的专业领域的探索不足。为了解决这一差距,我们引入了美国邀请数学考试(AIME)数学幻觉数据集,这是评估数学推理幻觉的基准,并提出了SelfCheck-Eval,这是一个与开放和闭源llm兼容的llm不可知的黑盒检测框架。该框架将语义、专门检测和上下文一致性三个独立模块集成到一个合适的体系结构中。系统评估揭示了显著的性能差距:现有方法在传记内容上表现良好,但在数学推理方面表现不佳,这一缺陷在自然语言推理(NLI)微调、偏好学习和过程监督范式中持续存在。这些发现揭示了当前方法的基本局限性,并激发了为可信的LLM部署开发专门的、黑盒兼容的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Patterns
Patterns Decision Sciences-Decision Sciences (all)
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
4.60%
发文量
153
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书