{"title":"SelfCheck-Eval: A multi-module framework for zero-resource hallucination detection in large language models.","authors":"Diyana Muhammed, Giusy Giulia Tuccari, Gollam Rabby, Sören Auer, Sahar Vahdati","doi":"10.1016/j.patter.2026.101569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Large language models (LLMs) have achieved considerable progress across diverse applications, yet their tendency to generate incorrect or fabricated content, commonly termed hallucinations, remains a fundamental obstacle to reliable deployment in high-stakes domains. Existing detection benchmarks are confined to general-knowledge settings, leaving specialized fields, where accuracy is important, underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce the American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) Math Hallucination dataset, a benchmark for evaluating mathematical reasoning hallucinations, and propose SelfCheck-Eval, an LLM-agnostic, black-box detection framework compatible with open- and closed-source LLMs. The framework integrates three independent modules, semantic, specialized detection, and contextual consistency, into a suitable architecture. Systematic evaluation reveals a noticeable performance gap: existing methods perform well on biographical content but struggle with mathematical reasoning, a deficit that continues across natural language inference (NLI) fine-tuning, preference learning, and process supervision paradigms. These findings expose fundamental limitations of current approaches and motivate the development of specialized, black-box-compatible methods for trustworthy LLM deployment.</p>","PeriodicalId":36242,"journal":{"name":"Patterns","volume":"7 6","pages":"101569"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13280721/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patterns","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2026.101569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved considerable progress across diverse applications, yet their tendency to generate incorrect or fabricated content, commonly termed hallucinations, remains a fundamental obstacle to reliable deployment in high-stakes domains. Existing detection benchmarks are confined to general-knowledge settings, leaving specialized fields, where accuracy is important, underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce the American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) Math Hallucination dataset, a benchmark for evaluating mathematical reasoning hallucinations, and propose SelfCheck-Eval, an LLM-agnostic, black-box detection framework compatible with open- and closed-source LLMs. The framework integrates three independent modules, semantic, specialized detection, and contextual consistency, into a suitable architecture. Systematic evaluation reveals a noticeable performance gap: existing methods perform well on biographical content but struggle with mathematical reasoning, a deficit that continues across natural language inference (NLI) fine-tuning, preference learning, and process supervision paradigms. These findings expose fundamental limitations of current approaches and motivate the development of specialized, black-box-compatible methods for trustworthy LLM deployment.