From passive consumers to critical evaluators: promoting media literacy in animal science.

IF 1.9 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Translational Animal Science Pub Date : 2026-06-05 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1093/tas/txag073
Ciana M Bowhay
{"title":"From passive consumers to critical evaluators: promoting media literacy in animal science.","authors":"Ciana M Bowhay","doi":"10.1093/tas/txag073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Media literacy is increasingly vital in animal science education, where students face widespread misinformation about production practices, nutrition, and animal health and welfare. Students often overestimate their ability to discern credible sources from misinformation which can create barriers to learning when misconceptions interfere with integration of new knowledge. This study examined how an assignment grounded in principles of the critical media literacy framework influenced students' evaluation of credibility and perceptions of misinformation. This assignment was implemented in two semesters of an undergraduate Animal Nutrition course (<i>n</i> = 42) and required students to critically evaluate media related to course content. Student assignments and reflections were analyzed using qualitative open coding to identify emerging themes. Students indicated that prior to engaging in the assignment, they relied on superficial indicators of credibility like perceived author expertise, presentation style, or popularity. After completing the project, students reported greater awareness of bias and misinformation and commitment to deeper evaluation strategies when consuming media. Many indicated intentions to research claims more thoroughly, approach popular media about animal science with increased skepticism, and assess the credibility of authors before accepting their claims. These findings suggest that integration of media literacy activities in animal science curricula can support critical reflection practices on students' evaluation of information. This provides conditions consistent with transformative learning by prompting students to challenge existing assumptions and adopt a more reflective approach when navigating digital media. Developing these skills is essential for future animal science professionals to critically evaluate information and engage credibly in scientific discourse within a rapidly evolving digital landscape.</p>","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":"10 ","pages":"txag073"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13282084/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txag073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Media literacy is increasingly vital in animal science education, where students face widespread misinformation about production practices, nutrition, and animal health and welfare. Students often overestimate their ability to discern credible sources from misinformation which can create barriers to learning when misconceptions interfere with integration of new knowledge. This study examined how an assignment grounded in principles of the critical media literacy framework influenced students' evaluation of credibility and perceptions of misinformation. This assignment was implemented in two semesters of an undergraduate Animal Nutrition course (n = 42) and required students to critically evaluate media related to course content. Student assignments and reflections were analyzed using qualitative open coding to identify emerging themes. Students indicated that prior to engaging in the assignment, they relied on superficial indicators of credibility like perceived author expertise, presentation style, or popularity. After completing the project, students reported greater awareness of bias and misinformation and commitment to deeper evaluation strategies when consuming media. Many indicated intentions to research claims more thoroughly, approach popular media about animal science with increased skepticism, and assess the credibility of authors before accepting their claims. These findings suggest that integration of media literacy activities in animal science curricula can support critical reflection practices on students' evaluation of information. This provides conditions consistent with transformative learning by prompting students to challenge existing assumptions and adopt a more reflective approach when navigating digital media. Developing these skills is essential for future animal science professionals to critically evaluate information and engage credibly in scientific discourse within a rapidly evolving digital landscape.

从被动的消费者到批判的评估者:促进动物科学的媒体素养。
媒体素养在动物科学教育中越来越重要,因为学生们面临着关于生产实践、营养、动物健康和福利的广泛错误信息。学生往往高估了自己从错误信息中辨别可信来源的能力,当错误的观念干扰了新知识的整合时,这会给学习带来障碍。本研究考察了基于批判性媒体素养框架原则的作业如何影响学生对可信度的评估和对错误信息的感知。这项作业是在动物营养学本科课程(n = 42)的两个学期中完成的,要求学生批判性地评估与课程内容相关的媒体。使用定性开放编码分析学生作业和反思,以确定新兴主题。学生们表示,在参与作业之前,他们依赖于可信度的表面指标,如作者专业知识、演讲风格或受欢迎程度。完成该项目后,学生们报告说,在消费媒体时,他们对偏见和错误信息的意识更强,并承诺采取更深入的评估策略。许多人表示,他们打算更彻底地研究声明,以更大的怀疑态度接触有关动物科学的大众媒体,并在接受作者的声明之前评估其可信度。这些发现表明,在动物科学课程中整合媒介素养活动可以支持学生对信息评价的批判性反思实践。这提供了与变革学习相一致的条件,促使学生挑战现有的假设,并在驾驭数字媒体时采用更具反思性的方法。发展这些技能对于未来的动物科学专业人员在快速发展的数字环境中批判性地评估信息和可靠地参与科学话语至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Animal Science
Translational Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书