{"title":"PPO-GPR: A Custom Proximal Policy Optimization Tool for Active Reinforcement Learning","authors":"Etinosa Osaro, Yamil J. Colón","doi":"10.1021/acsengineeringau.5c00122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Efficient data selection\r\nis critical in domains where data acquisition\r\nis expensive and time-consuming, such as material science. In this\r\nwork, we introduce a novel active learning framework that integrates\r\nproximal policy optimization (PPO) with Gaussian process regression\r\n(GPR) to strategically select informative data points and thereby\r\nenhance predictive modeling. Leveraging the inherent stability and\r\nsample efficiency of PPO, achieved through a clipped surrogate objective,\r\nthe framework guides data acquisition via a custom-designed Gymnasium\r\nenvironment tailored for GPR. In this environment, the PPO agent dynamically\r\nchooses data points based on their potential to improve the GPR’s\r\nperformance, as measured by the <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> score,\r\nwhile preventing redundancy through an action masking mechanism. We\r\napply the proposed methodology to predict the selectivity of methane\r\n(CH<sub>4</sub>) over higher alkanes in metal–organic frameworks\r\n(MOFs), focusing on CuBTC and IRMOF-1. The framework is evaluated\r\nusing both ternary and quaternary gas mixtures, where the performance\r\nof the GPR is assessed through metrics such as <em>R</em><sup>2</sup>, mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean squared error (RMSE).\r\nAcross CuBTC and IRMOF-1 in ternary and quaternary hydrocarbon mixtures,\r\nPPO-guided acquisition achieves 77–86% data savings relative\r\nto full GCMC grids, typically querying only ∼14–23%\r\nof the candidate pool while the clipped-update PPO policy converges\r\nstably by focusing selections in the pressure–temperature–composition\r\nregions where selectivity changes most rapidly. This work shows the\r\npotential of combining advanced reinforcement learning techniques\r\nwith regression models to accelerate material discovery and optimize\r\ngas separation processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":29804,"journal":{"name":"ACS Engineering Au","volume":"6 3","pages":"446–462"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Engineering Au","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsengineeringau.5c00122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Efficient data selection
is critical in domains where data acquisition
is expensive and time-consuming, such as material science. In this
work, we introduce a novel active learning framework that integrates
proximal policy optimization (PPO) with Gaussian process regression
(GPR) to strategically select informative data points and thereby
enhance predictive modeling. Leveraging the inherent stability and
sample efficiency of PPO, achieved through a clipped surrogate objective,
the framework guides data acquisition via a custom-designed Gymnasium
environment tailored for GPR. In this environment, the PPO agent dynamically
chooses data points based on their potential to improve the GPR’s
performance, as measured by the R2 score,
while preventing redundancy through an action masking mechanism. We
apply the proposed methodology to predict the selectivity of methane
(CH4) over higher alkanes in metal–organic frameworks
(MOFs), focusing on CuBTC and IRMOF-1. The framework is evaluated
using both ternary and quaternary gas mixtures, where the performance
of the GPR is assessed through metrics such as R2, mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean squared error (RMSE).
Across CuBTC and IRMOF-1 in ternary and quaternary hydrocarbon mixtures,
PPO-guided acquisition achieves 77–86% data savings relative
to full GCMC grids, typically querying only ∼14–23%
of the candidate pool while the clipped-update PPO policy converges
stably by focusing selections in the pressure–temperature–composition
regions where selectivity changes most rapidly. This work shows the
potential of combining advanced reinforcement learning techniques
with regression models to accelerate material discovery and optimize
gas separation processes.
期刊介绍:
)ACS Engineering Au is an open access journal that reports significant advances in chemical engineering applied chemistry and energy covering fundamentals processes and products. The journal's broad scope includes experimental theoretical mathematical computational chemical and physical research from academic and industrial settings. Short letters comprehensive articles reviews and perspectives are welcome on topics that include:Fundamental research in such areas as thermodynamics transport phenomena (flow mixing mass & heat transfer) chemical reaction kinetics and engineering catalysis separations interfacial phenomena and materialsProcess design development and intensification (e.g. process technologies for chemicals and materials synthesis and design methods process intensification multiphase reactors scale-up systems analysis process control data correlation schemes modeling machine learning Artificial Intelligence)Product research and development involving chemical and engineering aspects (e.g. catalysts plastics elastomers fibers adhesives coatings paper membranes lubricants ceramics aerosols fluidic devices intensified process equipment)Energy and fuels (e.g. pre-treatment processing and utilization of renewable energy resources; processing and utilization of fuels; properties and structure or molecular composition of both raw fuels and refined products; fuel cells hydrogen batteries; photochemical fuel and energy production; decarbonization; electrification; microwave; cavitation)Measurement techniques computational models and data on thermo-physical thermodynamic and transport properties of materials and phase equilibrium behaviorNew methods models and tools (e.g. real-time data analytics multi-scale models physics informed machine learning models machine learning enhanced physics-based models soft sensors high-performance computing)