Geographic Analysis of Access to Glaucoma Care by Provider Type and Population Demographics.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ophthalmic epidemiology Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-29 DOI:10.1080/09286586.2026.2621416
David Mothy, Riya H Patel, Hassaam S Choudhry, Neha Sarabu, Rishima Kasi, Albert S Khouri
{"title":"Geographic Analysis of Access to Glaucoma Care by Provider Type and Population Demographics.","authors":"David Mothy, Riya H Patel, Hassaam S Choudhry, Neha Sarabu, Rishima Kasi, Albert S Khouri","doi":"10.1080/09286586.2026.2621416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To characterize the geographic distribution of glaucoma eye care providers in the United States and identify disparities in access to glaucoma care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using four public databases, the names and addresses of ophthalmic and optometric glaucoma eye care providers were identified. Each provider was geocoded into a United States county using ArcGIS Pro (Esri). Population demographics were recorded for each county using data from the 2018-2022 American Community Survey. Analysis of variance was used to compare socioeconomic indices between counties with and without glaucoma eye care providers in SPSS Statistics (IBM Corp.).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2183 ophthalmologists and 622 optometrists were identified. The states with the most glaucoma-specializing ophthalmologists per one million people were Connecticut (11.37), Maryland (10.85), and Massachusetts (10.24). About 2471 (78.61%) counties had no glaucoma eye care providers, 278 (8.84%) only had ophthalmologists, 176 (5.60%) only had optometrists, and 218 (6.94%) had both provider types. When comparing counties with both ophthalmologists and optometrists to counties with no glaucoma eye care providers, counties with both provider types had higher median income ($82,712.12 vs. $60,368.73, <i>p</i> < 0.001), higher educational attainment (38.54% vs. 21.02%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), higher health insurance coverage (90.89% vs. 89.17%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and lower poverty (11.28% vs. 14.25%, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The unbalanced distribution of glaucoma eye care providers in the United States suggests that some regions may suffer from relatively poor access to care. This disparity is compounded by increased socioeconomic depravity in counties lacking glaucoma eye care providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":19607,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","volume":"33 4","pages":"365-372"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2026.2621416","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To characterize the geographic distribution of glaucoma eye care providers in the United States and identify disparities in access to glaucoma care.

Methods: Using four public databases, the names and addresses of ophthalmic and optometric glaucoma eye care providers were identified. Each provider was geocoded into a United States county using ArcGIS Pro (Esri). Population demographics were recorded for each county using data from the 2018-2022 American Community Survey. Analysis of variance was used to compare socioeconomic indices between counties with and without glaucoma eye care providers in SPSS Statistics (IBM Corp.).

Results: A total of 2183 ophthalmologists and 622 optometrists were identified. The states with the most glaucoma-specializing ophthalmologists per one million people were Connecticut (11.37), Maryland (10.85), and Massachusetts (10.24). About 2471 (78.61%) counties had no glaucoma eye care providers, 278 (8.84%) only had ophthalmologists, 176 (5.60%) only had optometrists, and 218 (6.94%) had both provider types. When comparing counties with both ophthalmologists and optometrists to counties with no glaucoma eye care providers, counties with both provider types had higher median income ($82,712.12 vs. $60,368.73, p < 0.001), higher educational attainment (38.54% vs. 21.02%, p < 0.001), higher health insurance coverage (90.89% vs. 89.17%, p < 0.001), and lower poverty (11.28% vs. 14.25%, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The unbalanced distribution of glaucoma eye care providers in the United States suggests that some regions may suffer from relatively poor access to care. This disparity is compounded by increased socioeconomic depravity in counties lacking glaucoma eye care providers.

青光眼医疗服务提供者类型和人口统计数据的地理分析。
目的:表征美国青光眼眼科护理提供者的地理分布,并确定获得青光眼护理的差异。方法:利用4个公共数据库,识别眼科和验光性青光眼眼科保健提供者的名称和地址。使用ArcGIS Pro (Esri)对每个供应商进行地理编码。使用2018-2022年美国社区调查的数据记录了每个县的人口统计数据。采用SPSS统计软件(IBM Corp.)进行方差分析,比较有和没有青光眼眼科保健提供者的县之间的社会经济指数。结果:共发现眼科医生2183名,验光师622名。每百万人中青光眼专科眼科医生最多的州是康涅狄格州(11.37人)、马里兰州(10.85人)和马萨诸塞州(10.24人)。2471个县(78.61%)没有青光眼眼科服务提供者,278个县(8.84%)只有眼科医生,176个县(5.60%)只有验光师,218个县(6.94%)两种提供者都有。当将有眼科医生和验光师的县与没有青光眼眼科服务提供者的县进行比较时,有两种提供者类型的县的收入中位数更高(82,712.12美元对60,368.73美元,p p p p p结论:美国青光眼眼科服务提供者分布的不平衡表明一些地区可能相对较差获得护理。在缺乏青光眼护理人员的县,社会经济的恶化加剧了这种差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmic epidemiology
Ophthalmic epidemiology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic Epidemiology is dedicated to the publication of original research into eye and vision health in the fields of epidemiology, public health and the prevention of blindness. Ophthalmic Epidemiology publishes editorials, original research reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis articles, brief communications and letters to the editor on all subjects related to ophthalmic epidemiology. A broad range of topics is suitable, such as: evaluating the risk of ocular diseases, general and specific study designs, screening program implementation and evaluation, eye health care access, delivery and outcomes, therapeutic efficacy or effectiveness, disease prognosis and quality of life, cost-benefit analysis, biostatistical theory and risk factor analysis. We are looking to expand our engagement with reports of international interest, including those regarding problems affecting developing countries, although reports from all over the world potentially are suitable. Clinical case reports, small case series (not enough for a cohort analysis) articles and animal research reports are not appropriate for this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书