Gut Microbiota Alterations Associated With Colonization by Multidrug-Resistant Organisms in ICU Patients: First Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 3.6 3区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Andra-Elena Goicea, Daniel-Corneliu Leucuța, Constantin Bodolea
{"title":"Gut Microbiota Alterations Associated With Colonization by Multidrug-Resistant Organisms in ICU Patients: First Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Andra-Elena Goicea,&nbsp;Daniel-Corneliu Leucuța,&nbsp;Constantin Bodolea","doi":"10.1002/mbo3.70322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Colonization by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) is a risk factor for infection and mortality in critically ill patients, yet current strategies to prevent or control dissemination show variable effectiveness. Whether alterations in microbiota structure and composition (dysbiosis) are associated with MDRO colonization in critically ill patients is an open question this study aims to address. We conducted the first systematic review and meta-analysis comparing intestinal microbiota structure (diversity) and composition (relative abundance of bacteria) between colonized critically ill patients and noncolonized/control patients. PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were systematically searched from inception to September 2025. The study protocol was preregistered on Open Science Framework, under embargo. Of 3003 records identified, 11 studies (<i>n</i> = 2823 patients) published between 2019 and 2025 met the inclusion criteria. The most frequently reported colonizing strains in MDROs-colonized patients were vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (58.2%), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (21.6%), extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing Enterobacterales (13.4%). All studies employed 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing to assess intestinal microbiota. Colonized critically ill patients had lower values of dominance/evenness and richness, reaching significantly lower values of information when compared with controls (mean difference in Shannon index = –1.18; 95% CI, –1.84 to –0.52; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Composition investigation revealed a significant increase in the Pseudomonadota phylum and the Enterobacteriaceae family in MDROs-colonized patients. Current evidence is limited and largely associational. Nevertheless, altered intestinal microbiota consistently characterize colonized critically ill patients. Further studies are warranted to determine whether early detection of dysbiosis can enhance early prediction/diagnosis of MDROs-colonization and guide the targeted microbiota-based strategies to prevent infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":18573,"journal":{"name":"MicrobiologyOpen","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mbo3.70322","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MicrobiologyOpen","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mbo3.70322","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Colonization by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) is a risk factor for infection and mortality in critically ill patients, yet current strategies to prevent or control dissemination show variable effectiveness. Whether alterations in microbiota structure and composition (dysbiosis) are associated with MDRO colonization in critically ill patients is an open question this study aims to address. We conducted the first systematic review and meta-analysis comparing intestinal microbiota structure (diversity) and composition (relative abundance of bacteria) between colonized critically ill patients and noncolonized/control patients. PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were systematically searched from inception to September 2025. The study protocol was preregistered on Open Science Framework, under embargo. Of 3003 records identified, 11 studies (n = 2823 patients) published between 2019 and 2025 met the inclusion criteria. The most frequently reported colonizing strains in MDROs-colonized patients were vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (58.2%), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (21.6%), extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing Enterobacterales (13.4%). All studies employed 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing to assess intestinal microbiota. Colonized critically ill patients had lower values of dominance/evenness and richness, reaching significantly lower values of information when compared with controls (mean difference in Shannon index = –1.18; 95% CI, –1.84 to –0.52; p < 0.001). Composition investigation revealed a significant increase in the Pseudomonadota phylum and the Enterobacteriaceae family in MDROs-colonized patients. Current evidence is limited and largely associational. Nevertheless, altered intestinal microbiota consistently characterize colonized critically ill patients. Further studies are warranted to determine whether early detection of dysbiosis can enhance early prediction/diagnosis of MDROs-colonization and guide the targeted microbiota-based strategies to prevent infections.

Abstract Image

ICU患者肠道菌群改变与多药耐药菌定植相关:首次系统回顾和荟萃分析。
耐多药生物(mdro)的定植是危重患者感染和死亡的危险因素,但目前预防或控制传播的策略显示出不同的效果。微生物群结构和组成的改变(生态失调)是否与危重患者的MDRO定植有关,这是本研究旨在解决的一个悬而未决的问题。我们进行了首次系统综述和荟萃分析,比较了定植危重患者和非定植/对照患者肠道微生物群结构(多样性)和组成(细菌的相对丰度)。PubMed、Web of Science和Scopus从成立到2025年9月进行了系统检索。该研究方案在禁令下在开放科学框架上预先注册。在确定的3003份记录中,2019年至2025年间发表的11项研究(n = 2823例患者)符合纳入标准。mdros定殖患者中最常见的定殖菌株是万古霉素耐药肠球菌(58.2%),碳青霉烯耐药肠杆菌(21.6%),广谱β-内酰胺酶产肠杆菌(13.4%)。所有研究都采用16S核糖体RNA测序来评估肠道微生物群。定植危重患者的优势度/均匀度和丰富度值较低,与对照组相比,信息值显著降低(Shannon指数平均差异= -1.18;95% CI, -1.84 ~ -0.52; p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MicrobiologyOpen
MicrobiologyOpen MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: MicrobiologyOpen is a peer reviewed, fully open access, broad-scope, and interdisciplinary journal delivering rapid decisions and fast publication of microbial science, a field which is undergoing a profound and exciting evolution in this post-genomic era. The journal aims to serve the research community by providing a vehicle for authors wishing to publish quality research in both fundamental and applied microbiology. Our goal is to publish articles that stimulate discussion and debate, as well as add to our knowledge base and further the understanding of microbial interactions and microbial processes. MicrobiologyOpen gives prompt and equal consideration to articles reporting theoretical, experimental, applied, and descriptive work in all aspects of bacteriology, virology, mycology and protistology, including, but not limited to: - agriculture - antimicrobial resistance - astrobiology - biochemistry - biotechnology - cell and molecular biology - clinical microbiology - computational, systems, and synthetic microbiology - environmental science - evolutionary biology, ecology, and systematics - food science and technology - genetics and genomics - geobiology and earth science - host-microbe interactions - infectious diseases - natural products discovery - pharmaceutical and medicinal chemistry - physiology - plant pathology - veterinary microbiology We will consider submissions across unicellular and cell-cluster organisms: prokaryotes (bacteria, archaea) and eukaryotes (fungi, protists, microalgae, lichens), as well as viruses and prions infecting or interacting with microorganisms, plants and animals, including genetic, biochemical, biophysical, bioinformatic and structural analyses. The journal features Original Articles (including full Research articles, Method articles, and Short Communications), Commentaries, Reviews, and Editorials. Original papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the article. We also support confirmatory research and aim to work with authors to meet reviewer expectations. MicrobiologyOpen publishes articles submitted directly to the journal and those referred from other Wiley journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书