Association of dexmedetomidine with improved survival in ICU delirium.

IF 4 4区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Yiwen Huang, Lixia Zhu, Yuechu Zhao, Xiaofei Yan, Qi Chen, Ting Li, Zhi Cao, Hongbin Li, Lingying Qu, Kai Gao, Xiaoxin Gao, Boliu Liang, Wenqiang Jiang, Weifeng Li, Bei Hu
{"title":"Association of dexmedetomidine with improved survival in ICU delirium.","authors":"Yiwen Huang, Lixia Zhu, Yuechu Zhao, Xiaofei Yan, Qi Chen, Ting Li, Zhi Cao, Hongbin Li, Lingying Qu, Kai Gao, Xiaoxin Gao, Boliu Liang, Wenqiang Jiang, Weifeng Li, Bei Hu","doi":"10.4097/kja.251060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intensive care unit (ICU) delirium is common in critically ill patients and portends poor outcomes. Although dexmedetomidine (DEX) provides arousable sedation and possible neuroprotection, its survival benefit in established ICU delirium remains unclear. This study assessed the association between DEX initiation within 24 h of ICU admission and mortality in patients with early ICU delirium.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used data from the Medical Information Market for Intensive Care IV database. ICU patients with a positive Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU screen on the first ICU day were included. The propensity score matching balanced baseline characteristics and interventions between the DEX and non-DEX groups. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to assess ICU mortality, 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality post ICU admission, together with the dose-response correlations with average daily DEX dose.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 7,441 eligible patients, matching yielded 2,596 patients, with 1,298 in each group. Mortality was lower in the DEX group than in the non-DEX group (13.33% vs. 18.18%, P = 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed better 30-day and 90-day survival in the DEX group.Fully adjusted Cox modeling showed DEX use associated with improved survival. (HR 0.67; 95%CI: 0.54-0.82; P < 0.001). This survival advantage persisted across subgroups and showed a dose-response pattern, with a higher daily DEX dose linked to better 30-day and 90-day survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early DEX administration was associated with improved short- and long-term survival in ICU patients with delirium. Prospective randomized trials are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":17855,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.251060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intensive care unit (ICU) delirium is common in critically ill patients and portends poor outcomes. Although dexmedetomidine (DEX) provides arousable sedation and possible neuroprotection, its survival benefit in established ICU delirium remains unclear. This study assessed the association between DEX initiation within 24 h of ICU admission and mortality in patients with early ICU delirium.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Medical Information Market for Intensive Care IV database. ICU patients with a positive Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU screen on the first ICU day were included. The propensity score matching balanced baseline characteristics and interventions between the DEX and non-DEX groups. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to assess ICU mortality, 30-day and 90-day all-cause mortality post ICU admission, together with the dose-response correlations with average daily DEX dose.

Results: Among 7,441 eligible patients, matching yielded 2,596 patients, with 1,298 in each group. Mortality was lower in the DEX group than in the non-DEX group (13.33% vs. 18.18%, P = 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed better 30-day and 90-day survival in the DEX group.Fully adjusted Cox modeling showed DEX use associated with improved survival. (HR 0.67; 95%CI: 0.54-0.82; P < 0.001). This survival advantage persisted across subgroups and showed a dose-response pattern, with a higher daily DEX dose linked to better 30-day and 90-day survival.

Conclusions: Early DEX administration was associated with improved short- and long-term survival in ICU patients with delirium. Prospective randomized trials are warranted.

右美托咪定与ICU谵妄患者生存率提高的关系。
背景:重症监护病房(ICU)谵妄常见于危重患者,预示着不良预后。虽然右美托咪定(DEX)提供可唤醒镇静和可能的神经保护,但其在ICU谵妄患者中的生存益处尚不清楚。本研究评估了重症监护病房早期谵妄患者入院24小时内开始使用DEX与死亡率之间的关系。方法:本回顾性队列研究使用重症监护医学信息市场IV数据库的数据。纳入首天ICU筛查混淆评估方法阳性的ICU患者。倾向评分匹配平衡基线特征和干预措施之间的DEX和非DEX组。采用Kaplan-Meier和Cox回归分析评估ICU死亡率、ICU入院后30天和90天全因死亡率,以及与平均每日DEX剂量的剂量-反应相关性。结果:在7441例符合条件的患者中,匹配产生2596例患者,每组1298例。DEX组死亡率低于非DEX组(13.33% vs. 18.18%, P = 0.001)。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,DEX组30天和90天生存率更高。完全调整后的Cox模型显示,DEX的使用与生存率的提高有关。(hr 0.67; 95%ci: 0.54 ~ 0.82; p < 0.001)。这种生存优势在亚组中持续存在,并表现出剂量-反应模式,较高的日DEX剂量与较好的30天和90天生存率相关。结论:早期给药DEX可提高ICU谵妄患者的短期和长期生存率。前瞻性随机试验是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
84
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书