Artificial Intelligence in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: A Narrative Review of Recent Clinical Applications and Ethical Considerations.

IF 7.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Stephen Cheng, Elizabeth Kim, Rina Bhalodi, Tevin Um, Dustin Wong, Eunice Y Yuen
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: A Narrative Review of Recent Clinical Applications and Ethical Considerations.","authors":"Stephen Cheng, Elizabeth Kim, Rina Bhalodi, Tevin Um, Dustin Wong, Eunice Y Yuen","doi":"10.1007/s11920-026-01691-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This narrative review examines recent literature of artificial intelligence (AI) in child and adolescent psychiatry. With increasing mental health disorders in young people along with persistent workforce shortages, AI has emerged as a potential tool to improve efficiency and support clinical decision making. However, using AI raises important ethical concerns which are summarized in our review.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Most AI applications in child and adolescent psychiatry remain early in development and are not ready for routine clinical use. AI scribes are likely impractical in many child psychiatry settings because of multiparty visits, consent concerns, and sensitive clinical discussions. Many multimodal diagnostic tools using machine learning still require further testing and can be impractical when relying on costly diagnostics like neuroimaging. Similarly, AI-assisted therapeutics requiring physical hardware like robotics and virtual or augmented reality devices can also be prohibitively expensive. One of the few exceptions includes AI-enabled video and eye-tracking approaches for autism diagnosis. Chatbots and robot companions may provide modest improvements for depression, but evidence remains limited in the pediatric population with risk of serious harm. Concerns of AI include misinformation, algorithmic biases, privacy risks, crisis mismanagement, and excessive emotional attachments to chatbots. AI may eventually support child and adolescent psychiatry, but current evidence supports cautious, supervised use rather than broad clinical adoption. Clinicians should help families understand AI's limits, encourage digital literacy, and ensure that AI remains an adjunct to human care rather than a substitute.</p>","PeriodicalId":11057,"journal":{"name":"Current Psychiatry Reports","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Psychiatry Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-026-01691-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: This narrative review examines recent literature of artificial intelligence (AI) in child and adolescent psychiatry. With increasing mental health disorders in young people along with persistent workforce shortages, AI has emerged as a potential tool to improve efficiency and support clinical decision making. However, using AI raises important ethical concerns which are summarized in our review.

Recent findings: Most AI applications in child and adolescent psychiatry remain early in development and are not ready for routine clinical use. AI scribes are likely impractical in many child psychiatry settings because of multiparty visits, consent concerns, and sensitive clinical discussions. Many multimodal diagnostic tools using machine learning still require further testing and can be impractical when relying on costly diagnostics like neuroimaging. Similarly, AI-assisted therapeutics requiring physical hardware like robotics and virtual or augmented reality devices can also be prohibitively expensive. One of the few exceptions includes AI-enabled video and eye-tracking approaches for autism diagnosis. Chatbots and robot companions may provide modest improvements for depression, but evidence remains limited in the pediatric population with risk of serious harm. Concerns of AI include misinformation, algorithmic biases, privacy risks, crisis mismanagement, and excessive emotional attachments to chatbots. AI may eventually support child and adolescent psychiatry, but current evidence supports cautious, supervised use rather than broad clinical adoption. Clinicians should help families understand AI's limits, encourage digital literacy, and ensure that AI remains an adjunct to human care rather than a substitute.

人工智能在儿童和青少年精神病学:近期临床应用和伦理考虑的叙述回顾。
综述目的:本文回顾了人工智能(AI)在儿童和青少年精神病学中的最新文献。随着年轻人精神健康障碍的增加以及持续的劳动力短缺,人工智能已成为提高效率和支持临床决策的潜在工具。然而,使用人工智能引发了重要的伦理问题,这些问题在我们的评论中进行了总结。最近的发现:大多数人工智能在儿童和青少年精神病学中的应用仍处于早期发展阶段,尚未准备好常规临床应用。由于多方访问、同意问题和敏感的临床讨论,人工智能抄写员在许多儿童精神病学设置中可能不切实际。许多使用机器学习的多模态诊断工具仍然需要进一步的测试,并且在依赖神经成像等昂贵的诊断时可能不切实际。同样,人工智能辅助治疗需要物理硬件,如机器人和虚拟或增强现实设备,也可能非常昂贵。为数不多的例外包括用于自闭症诊断的人工智能视频和眼球追踪方法。聊天机器人和机器人伴侣可能会适度改善抑郁症,但在有严重危害风险的儿科人群中,证据仍然有限。对人工智能的担忧包括错误信息、算法偏见、隐私风险、危机管理不善以及对聊天机器人的过度情感依恋。人工智能最终可能会支持儿童和青少年精神病学,但目前的证据支持谨慎、有监督的使用,而不是广泛的临床应用。临床医生应该帮助家庭了解人工智能的局限性,鼓励数字素养,并确保人工智能仍然是人类护理的辅助手段,而不是替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published research in psychiatry. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care of those affected by psychiatric disorders. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as anxiety, medicopsychiatric disorders, and schizophrenia and other related psychotic disorders. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书