Evaluation of a Modified Proprietary Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Measures Tool for Monitoring Toxicities Associated With Systemic Chemotherapy

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology Pub Date : 2026-10-22 Epub Date: 2026-06-22 DOI:10.1111/ajco.70128
Tali Lang, T. B. N. Hoang, Josh Farrington, Kirsten Seletto, Gary Richardson
{"title":"Evaluation of a Modified Proprietary Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Measures Tool for Monitoring Toxicities Associated With Systemic Chemotherapy","authors":"Tali Lang,&nbsp;T. B. N. Hoang,&nbsp;Josh Farrington,&nbsp;Kirsten Seletto,&nbsp;Gary Richardson","doi":"10.1111/ajco.70128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the feasibility of a specialized ePROMs tool measuring toxicity encountered by oncology patients during routine outpatient intravenous chemotherapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A proprietary ePROMs tool underwent modification to incorporate a questionnaire focused on nine chemotherapy-associated toxicities within Cabrini Hospital. This tool was piloted in a group of oncology patients receiving intravenous chemotherapy at two outpatient chemotherapy units in a private Australian healthcare center. Patients registered the toxicities and severity through the modified ePROMs tool weekly from the onset of treatment. The collected data were correlated with the specific chemotherapy drugs administered.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 133 enrolled patients, 102 completed the 12-week study. The median age was 61 years (range: 23–81), 94 participants were female (71%), and the most common cancer subtypes were breast (26%), gastrointestinal (25%), and gynecological (19%) cancers. Post-study feedback was gathered from 76 of the 102 participants (75% [95% confidence interval {CI}: 69.2–86.0]) who completed the 12-week program. These participants rated the ePROMs tool as user-friendly (100% [95% CI: 96.4–100.0]) and understandable (99% [95% CI: 96.4–100.0]), with a majority endorsing its usage to other patients receiving chemotherapy (96% [95% CI: 94.7–99.9]) and a preference to continue its usage (87% [95% CI: 79.2–93.0]).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The findings of the study indicate that implementation of an ePROMs tool for real-time reporting of chemotherapy toxicities during routine outpatient care is feasible and promising. Positive patient feedback highlights its prospective role in patient-centered care and improving the understanding and documentation of chemotherapy toxicities.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":"22 6","pages":"791-800"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajco.70128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

To assess the feasibility of a specialized ePROMs tool measuring toxicity encountered by oncology patients during routine outpatient intravenous chemotherapy.

Methods

A proprietary ePROMs tool underwent modification to incorporate a questionnaire focused on nine chemotherapy-associated toxicities within Cabrini Hospital. This tool was piloted in a group of oncology patients receiving intravenous chemotherapy at two outpatient chemotherapy units in a private Australian healthcare center. Patients registered the toxicities and severity through the modified ePROMs tool weekly from the onset of treatment. The collected data were correlated with the specific chemotherapy drugs administered.

Results

Of the 133 enrolled patients, 102 completed the 12-week study. The median age was 61 years (range: 23–81), 94 participants were female (71%), and the most common cancer subtypes were breast (26%), gastrointestinal (25%), and gynecological (19%) cancers. Post-study feedback was gathered from 76 of the 102 participants (75% [95% confidence interval {CI}: 69.2–86.0]) who completed the 12-week program. These participants rated the ePROMs tool as user-friendly (100% [95% CI: 96.4–100.0]) and understandable (99% [95% CI: 96.4–100.0]), with a majority endorsing its usage to other patients receiving chemotherapy (96% [95% CI: 94.7–99.9]) and a preference to continue its usage (87% [95% CI: 79.2–93.0]).

Conclusions

The findings of the study indicate that implementation of an ePROMs tool for real-time reporting of chemotherapy toxicities during routine outpatient care is feasible and promising. Positive patient feedback highlights its prospective role in patient-centered care and improving the understanding and documentation of chemotherapy toxicities.

评估一种改进的专有电子患者报告结果测量工具,用于监测与全身化疗相关的毒性。
目的:评估一种专门的ePROMs工具测量肿瘤患者在常规门诊静脉化疗中遇到的毒性的可行性。方法:对专有的eprom工具进行了修改,纳入了一份调查问卷,重点关注卡布里尼医院的九种化疗相关毒性。该工具在澳大利亚一家私人医疗保健中心的两个门诊化疗单位接受静脉化疗的一组肿瘤患者中进行了试点。患者从治疗开始每周通过改良的ePROMs工具记录毒性和严重程度。收集到的数据与所使用的特定化疗药物相关。结果:133例入组患者中,102例完成了为期12周的研究。中位年龄为61岁(范围:23-81岁),94名参与者为女性(71%),最常见的癌症亚型是乳腺癌(26%),胃肠道(25%)和妇科(19%)癌症。研究后反馈来自102名参与者中的76名(75%[95%可信区间{CI}: 69.2-86.0]),他们完成了为期12周的计划。这些参与者认为ePROMs工具是用户友好的(100% [95% CI: 96.4-100.0])和可理解的(99% [95% CI: 96.4-100.0]),大多数人支持将其用于其他接受化疗的患者(96% [95% CI: 94.7-99.9]),并倾向于继续使用(87% [95% CI: 79.2-93.0])。结论:该研究结果表明,在常规门诊护理中实施ePROMs工具实时报告化疗毒性是可行的和有希望的。积极的患者反馈突出了其在以患者为中心的护理和改善化疗毒性的理解和文件的前瞻性作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal of oncology that aims to be a forum for facilitating collaboration and exchanging information on what is happening in different countries of the Asia–Pacific region in relation to cancer treatment and care. The Journal is ideally positioned to receive publications that deal with diversity in cancer behavior, management and outcome related to ethnic, cultural, economic and other differences between populations. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes reviews, editorials, letters to the Editor and short communications. Case reports are generally not considered for publication, only exceptional papers in which Editors find extraordinary oncological value may be considered for review. The Journal encourages clinical studies, particularly prospectively designed clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书