Interpretable machine learning for rare events: an inverse probability weighted application to understanding glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists use and incident alcohol-related disorder.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Rinoj Gautam, Hao Wang, Bo Zhou, Rolake Neba, Usha Sambamoorthi
{"title":"Interpretable machine learning for rare events: an inverse probability weighted application to understanding glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists use and incident alcohol-related disorder.","authors":"Rinoj Gautam, Hao Wang, Bo Zhou, Rolake Neba, Usha Sambamoorthi","doi":"10.1093/alcalc/agag045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Large administrative datasets enable investigation of rare outcomes, but accurate individual-level prediction remains challenging. Emerging evidence suggests that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), used to treat diabetes and obesity, may reduce alcohol craving and intake. We examined predictors of incident alcohol-related disorder (ARD) using inverse probability-weighted (IPW) machine learning models, focusing on GLP-1 RA use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the MarketScan Multi-State Medicaid Database (N = 96 460). Type 2 diabetic adults aged 18-64 years with GLP-1 RA prescription coverage (2022-2023) and no ARD in 2022 were included. Baseline variables included demographics, social risk factors (Z-codes), comorbidities, insurance characteristics, and GLP-1 RA use. Propensity scores were used to derive stabilized IPW weights to adjust for confounding in GLP-1 RA exposure. An Extreme Gradient Boosting model with IPW was trained using a 70/30 train-test split with five-fold cross-validation and probability calibration. Performance was evaluated using Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve (AUROC), recall, and precision. Model interpretability was assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GLP-1 RAs were used by 21.7% of individuals; 2.1% (N = 2004) developed incident ARD. The model demonstrated modest discrimination (AUROC = 0.67). Recall and precision were 0.28 and 0.05, respectively. SHAP analysis ranked GLP-1 RA use as the sixth most influential predictor and showed an association with lower predicted ARD risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Predicting rare outcomes remains difficult, particularly for identifying positive cases. Interpretable machine learning identified GLP-1 RA use as an important feature associated with lower predicted ARD risk, warranting further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7407,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol and alcoholism","volume":"61 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol and alcoholism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agag045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Large administrative datasets enable investigation of rare outcomes, but accurate individual-level prediction remains challenging. Emerging evidence suggests that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), used to treat diabetes and obesity, may reduce alcohol craving and intake. We examined predictors of incident alcohol-related disorder (ARD) using inverse probability-weighted (IPW) machine learning models, focusing on GLP-1 RA use.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the MarketScan Multi-State Medicaid Database (N = 96 460). Type 2 diabetic adults aged 18-64 years with GLP-1 RA prescription coverage (2022-2023) and no ARD in 2022 were included. Baseline variables included demographics, social risk factors (Z-codes), comorbidities, insurance characteristics, and GLP-1 RA use. Propensity scores were used to derive stabilized IPW weights to adjust for confounding in GLP-1 RA exposure. An Extreme Gradient Boosting model with IPW was trained using a 70/30 train-test split with five-fold cross-validation and probability calibration. Performance was evaluated using Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve (AUROC), recall, and precision. Model interpretability was assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).

Results: GLP-1 RAs were used by 21.7% of individuals; 2.1% (N = 2004) developed incident ARD. The model demonstrated modest discrimination (AUROC = 0.67). Recall and precision were 0.28 and 0.05, respectively. SHAP analysis ranked GLP-1 RA use as the sixth most influential predictor and showed an association with lower predicted ARD risk.

Conclusion: Predicting rare outcomes remains difficult, particularly for identifying positive cases. Interpretable machine learning identified GLP-1 RA use as an important feature associated with lower predicted ARD risk, warranting further investigation.

罕见事件的可解释性机器学习:反概率加权应用于理解胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂的使用和酒精相关障碍的事件
目的:大型管理数据集能够调查罕见的结果,但准确的个人水平预测仍然具有挑战性。新出现的证据表明,用于治疗糖尿病和肥胖的胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)可能会减少对酒精的渴望和摄入量。我们使用逆概率加权(IPW)机器学习模型检查了酒精相关障碍(ARD)事件的预测因子,重点关注GLP-1 RA的使用。方法:我们使用MarketScan多州医疗补助数据库(N = 96 460)进行了一项回顾性队列研究。纳入年龄在18-64岁、GLP-1 RA处方覆盖(2022-2023)且2022年未出现ARD的2型糖尿病成年人。基线变量包括人口统计学、社会风险因素(z -code)、合并症、保险特征和GLP-1 RA的使用。倾向评分用于获得稳定的IPW权重,以调整GLP-1 RA暴露的混杂因素。采用70/30训练-测试分割法对IPW极端梯度增强模型进行训练,并进行五重交叉验证和概率校准。使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)、召回率和精密度来评估其性能。采用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)评价模型可解释性。结果:21.7%的个体使用GLP-1 RAs;2.1% (N = 2004)发生ARD。该模型具有中度判别性(AUROC = 0.67)。查全率为0.28,查准率为0.05。SHAP分析将GLP-1 RA的使用列为第六大最具影响力的预测因素,并显示与较低的ARD预测风险相关。结论:预测罕见的结果仍然很困难,特别是识别阳性病例。可解释的机器学习发现GLP-1 RA的使用是与较低的预测ARD风险相关的重要特征,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alcohol and alcoholism
Alcohol and alcoholism 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
62
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Alcohol and Alcoholism publishes papers on the biomedical, psychological, and sociological aspects of alcoholism and alcohol research, provided that they make a new and significant contribution to knowledge in the field. Papers include new results obtained experimentally, descriptions of new experimental (including clinical) methods of importance to the field of alcohol research and treatment, or new interpretations of existing results. Theoretical contributions are considered equally with papers dealing with experimental work provided that such theoretical contributions are not of a largely speculative or philosophical nature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书