Do cover crops influence beneficial and herbivorous arthropod communities across growing seasons?

IF 4.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY
Adegboyega Fajemisin, Satinderpal Kaur, Alejandro Vasquez, Alexis Racelis, Rupesh Kariyat
{"title":"Do cover crops influence beneficial and herbivorous arthropod communities across growing seasons?","authors":"Adegboyega Fajemisin, Satinderpal Kaur, Alejandro Vasquez, Alexis Racelis, Rupesh Kariyat","doi":"10.1007/s10340-026-02051-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cover crops provide multiple ecosystem services in agriculture, yet their influence on arthropod communities remains poorly understood, especially in commercial farming. Despite their potential benefits, it remains unexplored how cover crops affect arthropod community dynamics across multiple growing seasons. We conducted a two-year study across three commercial farms in the Lower Rio Grande Valley, Texas, to examine how cover crops influence arthropod community composition and abundance, whether beneficial arthropods (natural enemies and pollinators) persist into cash-crop phases, and how cover crops affect natural enemy–herbivore relationships. We compared arthropod communities between cover-crop treatments and control plots and tracked responses through subsequent cash-crop phases. We sampled arthropods and classified them into functional groups, including natural enemies, herbivores, and pollinators. Total arthropod abundance declined 45% between years across all treatments, and year-to-year variation exceeded treatment effects for all functional groups. Arthropod community composition differed between sampling years, and year influenced composition more strongly than cover-crop treatment. Natural enemy abundance showed no treatment effects but declined 43% between years and remained stable during transitions from cover crops to cash crops. Pollinator abundance declined 74% between years, with no treatment effects and only minor carryover into the subsequent cash-crop phase. Natural enemies and herbivores correlated positively, with stronger relationships in cash-crop phases than in cover-crop phases. These findings show that temporal variation outweighed management effects, which suggests that cover-crop effectiveness for supporting arthropod communities might depend on environmental conditions, landscape context, and management practices. Multi-year studies are essential to understand how cover crops influence arthropod-mediated ecosystem services in commercial agriculture.","PeriodicalId":16736,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pest Science","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pest Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-026-02051-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cover crops provide multiple ecosystem services in agriculture, yet their influence on arthropod communities remains poorly understood, especially in commercial farming. Despite their potential benefits, it remains unexplored how cover crops affect arthropod community dynamics across multiple growing seasons. We conducted a two-year study across three commercial farms in the Lower Rio Grande Valley, Texas, to examine how cover crops influence arthropod community composition and abundance, whether beneficial arthropods (natural enemies and pollinators) persist into cash-crop phases, and how cover crops affect natural enemy–herbivore relationships. We compared arthropod communities between cover-crop treatments and control plots and tracked responses through subsequent cash-crop phases. We sampled arthropods and classified them into functional groups, including natural enemies, herbivores, and pollinators. Total arthropod abundance declined 45% between years across all treatments, and year-to-year variation exceeded treatment effects for all functional groups. Arthropod community composition differed between sampling years, and year influenced composition more strongly than cover-crop treatment. Natural enemy abundance showed no treatment effects but declined 43% between years and remained stable during transitions from cover crops to cash crops. Pollinator abundance declined 74% between years, with no treatment effects and only minor carryover into the subsequent cash-crop phase. Natural enemies and herbivores correlated positively, with stronger relationships in cash-crop phases than in cover-crop phases. These findings show that temporal variation outweighed management effects, which suggests that cover-crop effectiveness for supporting arthropod communities might depend on environmental conditions, landscape context, and management practices. Multi-year studies are essential to understand how cover crops influence arthropod-mediated ecosystem services in commercial agriculture.
覆盖作物在整个生长季节对有益和食草节肢动物群落有影响吗?
覆盖作物在农业中提供多种生态系统服务,但它们对节肢动物群落的影响仍然知之甚少,特别是在商业农业中。尽管有潜在的好处,但覆盖作物如何影响节肢动物群落在多个生长季节的动态仍未被探索。我们在德克萨斯州Lower里约热内卢Grande Valley的三个商业农场进行了为期两年的研究,以研究覆盖作物如何影响节肢动物群落的组成和丰度,是否有益的节肢动物(天敌和传粉者)持续到经济作物阶段,以及覆盖作物如何影响天敌-食草动物的关系。我们比较了覆盖作物处理和对照地的节肢动物群落,并跟踪了随后经济作物阶段的反应。我们对节肢动物进行了采样,并将其分为天敌、食草动物和传粉者等功能类群。节肢动物总丰度在所有治疗组的年之间下降了45%,并且在所有功能组中,年之间的变化超过了治疗效果。节肢动物群落组成在不同采样年份之间存在差异,且年份对群落组成的影响强于覆盖-作物处理。天敌丰度无处理效果,但逐年下降43%,在覆盖作物向经济作物过渡期间保持稳定。授粉者的丰度逐年下降了74%,没有任何处理效果,只有少量的延续到随后的经济作物阶段。天敌与草食动物正相关,在经济作物期的关系强于覆盖作物期。这些发现表明,时间变化大于管理效应,这表明支持节肢动物群落的覆盖作物有效性可能取决于环境条件、景观背景和管理实践。多年的研究对于了解覆盖作物如何影响商业农业中节肢动物介导的生态系统服务至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pest Science
Journal of Pest Science 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pest Science publishes high-quality papers on all aspects of pest science in agriculture, horticulture (including viticulture), forestry, urban pests, and stored products research, including health and safety issues. Journal of Pest Science reports on advances in control of pests and animal vectors of diseases, the biology, ethology and ecology of pests and their antagonists, and the use of other beneficial organisms in pest control. The journal covers all noxious or damaging groups of animals, including arthropods, nematodes, molluscs, and vertebrates. Journal of Pest Science devotes special attention to emerging and innovative pest control strategies, including the side effects of such approaches on non-target organisms, for example natural enemies and pollinators, and the implementation of these strategies in integrated pest management. Journal of Pest Science also publishes papers on the management of agro- and forest ecosystems where this is relevant to pest control. Papers on important methodological developments relevant for pest control will be considered as well.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书