Response of Soil Erodibility Property to Ephemeral Gully Development in Long Gentle Cropland of Northeast China

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Land Degradation & Development Pub Date : 2026-08-11 Epub Date: 2026-06-16 DOI:10.1002/ldr.70735
Jun Jing, Guanghui Zhang, Rongchang Zeng, Shukun Xing
{"title":"Response of Soil Erodibility Property to Ephemeral Gully Development in Long Gentle Cropland of Northeast China","authors":"Jun Jing,&nbsp;Guanghui Zhang,&nbsp;Rongchang Zeng,&nbsp;Shukun Xing","doi":"10.1002/ldr.70735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Ephemeral gully development (EGD) drives substantial land degradation, profoundly altering soil erodibility properties in cropland. Despite its importance, the spatial patterns of soil erodibility properties within degraded areas, as well as the underlying controlling factors, remain poorly understood. This study quantitatively assessed the spatial heterogeneity of eight soil erodibility indicators in cropland degraded by EGD in the Mollisol region of Northeast China. An improved construction procedure based on network analysis was employed to integrate these indicators into a comprehensive soil erodibility index (CSEI<sub>NA</sub>), while the dominant factors and underlying pathways governing the index were identified. The results indicated that structural stability index, penetration resistance, soil cohesion, mean number of raindrop impacts and mean weight diameter progressively decreased from original cropland to gully floor, with average decreases ranging from 2.6% to 12.0%. From contribution area to lower slope, these indicators followed a decrease–increase pattern, with variation ranges of −43.4% to −4.9% and 10.3% to 117.3%. In contrast, erodibility factor, saturated hydraulic conductivity and slaking rate exhibited opposite trends. CSEI<sub>NA</sub> provided a more effective characterization of soil erodibility and better captured its spatial variability. In the ephemeral gully system, the CSEI<sub>NA</sub> peaked at the gully floor and middle slope, which should be prioritized for erosion risk management. Clay content, sand content, physical crust thickness, organic matter content, root mass density, and straw mass density were identified as the dominant factors influencing CSEI<sub>NA</sub>, jointly explaining 92.5% of its variability. These findings offer essential theoretical and methodological insights for managing soil erodibility in erosion-degraded cropland.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":203,"journal":{"name":"Land Degradation & Development","volume":"37 14","pages":"9818-9833"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Degradation & Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ldr.70735","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ephemeral gully development (EGD) drives substantial land degradation, profoundly altering soil erodibility properties in cropland. Despite its importance, the spatial patterns of soil erodibility properties within degraded areas, as well as the underlying controlling factors, remain poorly understood. This study quantitatively assessed the spatial heterogeneity of eight soil erodibility indicators in cropland degraded by EGD in the Mollisol region of Northeast China. An improved construction procedure based on network analysis was employed to integrate these indicators into a comprehensive soil erodibility index (CSEINA), while the dominant factors and underlying pathways governing the index were identified. The results indicated that structural stability index, penetration resistance, soil cohesion, mean number of raindrop impacts and mean weight diameter progressively decreased from original cropland to gully floor, with average decreases ranging from 2.6% to 12.0%. From contribution area to lower slope, these indicators followed a decrease–increase pattern, with variation ranges of −43.4% to −4.9% and 10.3% to 117.3%. In contrast, erodibility factor, saturated hydraulic conductivity and slaking rate exhibited opposite trends. CSEINA provided a more effective characterization of soil erodibility and better captured its spatial variability. In the ephemeral gully system, the CSEINA peaked at the gully floor and middle slope, which should be prioritized for erosion risk management. Clay content, sand content, physical crust thickness, organic matter content, root mass density, and straw mass density were identified as the dominant factors influencing CSEINA, jointly explaining 92.5% of its variability. These findings offer essential theoretical and methodological insights for managing soil erodibility in erosion-degraded cropland.

东北长期缓耕地土壤可蚀性对短暂沟壑发育的响应
短暂沟发育(EGD)导致大量土地退化,深刻地改变了农田土壤的可蚀性。尽管其重要性,但退化地区土壤可蚀性的空间格局及其潜在的控制因素仍然知之甚少。本研究对东北Mollisol地区EGD退化农田8项土壤可蚀性指标的空间异质性进行了定量评价。采用改进的基于网络分析的构建程序,将这些指标整合为土壤可蚀性综合指数(CSEI NA),并确定了影响该指数的主导因素和潜在途径。结果表明:从原田到沟底,结构稳定性指数、穿透阻力、土壤粘聚力、平均雨滴撞击次数和平均重径呈递减趋势,平均递减幅度为2.6% ~ 12.0%;从贡献区到下坡区,各指标均呈减少增加的趋势,变化幅度分别为- 43.4% ~ - 4.9%和10.3% ~ 117.3%。而可蚀性因子、饱和导水率和溶蚀速率则相反。CSEI NA能更有效地表征土壤可蚀性,更好地捕捉土壤可蚀性的空间变异性。在短暂性沟壑系统中,CSEI NA在沟底和中坡处达到峰值,应优先进行侵蚀风险管理。粘土含量、砂粒含量、物理结皮厚度、有机质含量、根系质量密度和秸秆质量密度是影响CSEI NA的主导因子,共同解释了其变异率的92.5%。这些发现为管理侵蚀退化农田的土壤可蚀性提供了重要的理论和方法见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Land Degradation & Development
Land Degradation & Development 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
5.5 months
期刊介绍: Land Degradation & Development is an international journal which seeks to promote rational study of the recognition, monitoring, control and rehabilitation of degradation in terrestrial environments. The journal focuses on: - what land degradation is; - what causes land degradation; - the impacts of land degradation - the scale of land degradation; - the history, current status or future trends of land degradation; - avoidance, mitigation and control of land degradation; - remedial actions to rehabilitate or restore degraded land; - sustainable land management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书