Mike Kelley’s Speculative Architectures: Rethinking Public Art, Pedagogy, and Memory in Social Engagement

IF 0.5 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Arts Pub Date : 2026-05-11 DOI:10.3390/arts15050104
Amy Bowman-McElhone
{"title":"Mike Kelley’s Speculative Architectures: Rethinking Public Art, Pedagogy, and Memory in Social Engagement","authors":"Amy Bowman-McElhone","doi":"10.3390/arts15050104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines Mike Kelley’s Educational Complex (1995) and his culminating public artwork, Mobile Homestead (2005–2013), as speculative architectures that negotiate the fraught intersections of pedagogy, memory, and public engagement. While Educational Complex mobilizes the language of architectural models and dioramas to materialize “blanks” as forms of pedagogical repression and institutional affiliation, Mobile Homestead extends this inquiry into public space through a community-oriented artwork that simultaneously invites access and withholds subterranean, private zones. Situating these projects within discourses of socially engaged and public art, the article argues that Kelley stages a productive paradox: his sustained skepticism toward public art’s political agency is folded into works that nonetheless generate collective encounters, informal pedagogies, and disaffiliated publics. Read together, these speculative architectures reconceptualize failure, disobedience, and disaffiliation not as negations of public engagement, but as critical strategies for exposing institutional complicity while constructing alternative architectures of memory, play, and social relation. By repositioning Kelley—often read primarily through psychoanalytic frameworks—as a pivotal yet overlooked figure in the histories of socially engaged and public art, the article unsettles prevailing narratives of community, resistance, and the public good.","PeriodicalId":30547,"journal":{"name":"Arts","volume":"45 1","pages":"104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/arts15050104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines Mike Kelley’s Educational Complex (1995) and his culminating public artwork, Mobile Homestead (2005–2013), as speculative architectures that negotiate the fraught intersections of pedagogy, memory, and public engagement. While Educational Complex mobilizes the language of architectural models and dioramas to materialize “blanks” as forms of pedagogical repression and institutional affiliation, Mobile Homestead extends this inquiry into public space through a community-oriented artwork that simultaneously invites access and withholds subterranean, private zones. Situating these projects within discourses of socially engaged and public art, the article argues that Kelley stages a productive paradox: his sustained skepticism toward public art’s political agency is folded into works that nonetheless generate collective encounters, informal pedagogies, and disaffiliated publics. Read together, these speculative architectures reconceptualize failure, disobedience, and disaffiliation not as negations of public engagement, but as critical strategies for exposing institutional complicity while constructing alternative architectures of memory, play, and social relation. By repositioning Kelley—often read primarily through psychoanalytic frameworks—as a pivotal yet overlooked figure in the histories of socially engaged and public art, the article unsettles prevailing narratives of community, resistance, and the public good.
Mike Kelley的《思辨建筑:重新思考社会参与中的公共艺术、教育学和记忆》
本文考察了迈克·凯利(Mike Kelley)的《教育情结》(Educational Complex, 1995)和他的高潮公共艺术作品《移动家园》(Mobile Homestead, 2005-2013),这是一种投机建筑,它在教学法、记忆和公众参与的交叉点上进行了协商。“教育综合体”利用建筑模型和立体模型的语言,将“空白”作为教学压抑和机构隶属的形式具体化,而“移动家园”则通过面向社区的艺术作品将这种探索扩展到公共空间,同时邀请人们进入并保留地下私人区域。将这些项目置于社会参与和公共艺术的话语中,文章认为凯利提出了一个富有成效的悖论:他对公共艺术的政治代理的持续怀疑被纳入作品中,尽管如此,这些作品还是产生了集体遭遇、非正式教学法和脱离的公众。这些推测性的建筑将失败、不服从和脱离重新概念化,而不是作为对公众参与的否定,而是作为揭露制度同谋的关键策略,同时构建记忆、游戏和社会关系的替代建筑。通过重新定位凯利——通常主要通过精神分析框架来解读——作为社会参与和公共艺术历史中一个关键但被忽视的人物,文章颠覆了关于社区、抵抗和公共利益的主流叙事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arts
Arts HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
40.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书