New Ways to Teach and Learn Pragmatics for Advancing Academic Communication Competence: An AI-Mediated Multimodal Platform

IF 4.7 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Tressyalina Tressyalina, Bima Mhd Ghaluh, Ella Wulandari, Ena Noveria, Ermawati Arief
{"title":"New Ways to Teach and Learn Pragmatics for Advancing Academic Communication Competence: An AI-Mediated Multimodal Platform","authors":"Tressyalina Tressyalina, Bima Mhd Ghaluh, Ella Wulandari, Ena Noveria, Ermawati Arief","doi":"10.1177/13621688261446189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effective academic communication in multilingual higher education requires pragmatic competence, yet this dimension of language ability is often overlooked in instruction and insufficiently supported through feedback or authentic practice. Grounded in instructed pragmatics and technology-mediated learning frameworks, this study reports on the design, implementation, and empirical evaluation of an artificial intelligence (AI)-mediated multimodal platform developed to scaffold pragmatic competence in Indonesian within digital academic contexts. The platform integrates five interdependent features: automated text analysis to identify speech acts, politeness strategies, and violations of conversational principles; video analysis with multilingual transcription and theory-based annotation; conversation simulations providing context-specific academic interactions and real-time feedback; an AI consultation assistant offering explanations, examples, and targeted suggestions; and a digital politeness forum for peer and instructor exchange. A quasi-experimental mixed-methods design was employed with 240 undergraduates (120 in the experimental group, 120 in the control group) over a 5-week intervention. Pre- and postintervention assessments combined a validated pragmatic competence test, discourse completion tasks, and a self-report questionnaire on pragmatic awareness and confidence, complemented by student reflections and discussions. The experimental group demonstrated significantly greater gains in pragmatic test scores ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">M</jats:italic> = 15.0, <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">p</jats:italic> &lt; .001) compared with the control ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">M</jats:italic> = 5.2, <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">p</jats:italic> &lt; .001), alongside improvements on the discourse completion task (experimental = +14.1 vs. control = +4.8, both <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">p</jats:italic> &lt; .001) and medium-to-large effects on awareness and confidence in the questionnaire. Regression analysis identified engagement with conversation simulations ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">β</jats:italic> = 0.58, <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">p</jats:italic> &lt; .001) plus AI consultation ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">β</jats:italic> = 0.29, <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">p</jats:italic> = .012) as predictors of learning. Reflections and discussions underscored the platform’s role in enabling authentic practice, personalized feedback, and a safe environment for pragmatic experimentation. This study provides the first empirically validated model linking integrated AI-mediated scaffolding features to measurable and transferable gains in pragmatic competence, offering a scalable framework for multilingual and intercultural higher education.","PeriodicalId":47852,"journal":{"name":"Language Teaching Research","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Teaching Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688261446189","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective academic communication in multilingual higher education requires pragmatic competence, yet this dimension of language ability is often overlooked in instruction and insufficiently supported through feedback or authentic practice. Grounded in instructed pragmatics and technology-mediated learning frameworks, this study reports on the design, implementation, and empirical evaluation of an artificial intelligence (AI)-mediated multimodal platform developed to scaffold pragmatic competence in Indonesian within digital academic contexts. The platform integrates five interdependent features: automated text analysis to identify speech acts, politeness strategies, and violations of conversational principles; video analysis with multilingual transcription and theory-based annotation; conversation simulations providing context-specific academic interactions and real-time feedback; an AI consultation assistant offering explanations, examples, and targeted suggestions; and a digital politeness forum for peer and instructor exchange. A quasi-experimental mixed-methods design was employed with 240 undergraduates (120 in the experimental group, 120 in the control group) over a 5-week intervention. Pre- and postintervention assessments combined a validated pragmatic competence test, discourse completion tasks, and a self-report questionnaire on pragmatic awareness and confidence, complemented by student reflections and discussions. The experimental group demonstrated significantly greater gains in pragmatic test scores ( M = 15.0, p < .001) compared with the control ( M = 5.2, p < .001), alongside improvements on the discourse completion task (experimental = +14.1 vs. control = +4.8, both p < .001) and medium-to-large effects on awareness and confidence in the questionnaire. Regression analysis identified engagement with conversation simulations ( β = 0.58, p < .001) plus AI consultation ( β = 0.29, p = .012) as predictors of learning. Reflections and discussions underscored the platform’s role in enabling authentic practice, personalized feedback, and a safe environment for pragmatic experimentation. This study provides the first empirically validated model linking integrated AI-mediated scaffolding features to measurable and transferable gains in pragmatic competence, offering a scalable framework for multilingual and intercultural higher education.
提高学术交际能力的语用学教学新方法:人工智能介导的多模态平台
在多语言高等教育中,有效的学术交流需要语用能力,但这一语言能力的维度往往在教学中被忽视,并且没有通过反馈或真实的实践得到足够的支持。本研究以指导语用学和技术为中介的学习框架为基础,报告了人工智能(AI)为中介的多模式平台的设计、实施和实证评估,该平台旨在在数字学术背景下支撑印尼语的语用能力。该平台集成了五个相互依存的功能:自动文本分析,以识别言语行为、礼貌策略和违反会话原则;基于多语种转录和理论注释的视频分析会话模拟,提供特定情境的学术互动和实时反馈;提供解释、示例和有针对性建议的人工智能咨询助手;还有一个数字礼貌论坛,供同行和导师交流。采用准实验混合方法设计,对240名本科生(实验组120人,对照组120人)进行为期5周的干预。干预前和干预后的评估包括有效的语用能力测试、语篇完成任务和关于语用意识和信心的自我报告问卷,辅以学生的反思和讨论。与对照组(M = 5.2, p < .001)相比,实验组在语用测试成绩(M = 15.0, p < .001)上取得了显著的进步,在语篇完成任务上取得了进步(实验组= +14.1,对照组= +4.8,p < .001),在问卷的意识和信心方面也取得了中大型效果。回归分析发现,参与对话模拟(β = 0.58, p < .001)和人工智能咨询(β = 0.29, p = 0.012)是学习的预测因素。反思和讨论强调了该平台在实现真实实践、个性化反馈和实用实验的安全环境方面的作用。本研究提供了第一个经实证验证的模型,将人工智能介导的综合脚手架特征与语用能力的可衡量和可转移收益联系起来,为多语言和跨文化高等教育提供了一个可扩展的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: Language Teaching Research is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes research within the area of second or foreign language teaching. Although articles are written in English, the journal welcomes studies dealing with the teaching of languages other than English as well. The journal is a venue for studies that demonstrate sound research methods and which report findings that have clear pedagogical implications. A wide range of topics in the area of language teaching is covered, including: -Programme -Syllabus -Materials design -Methodology -The teaching of specific skills and language for specific purposes Thorough investigation and research ensures this journal is: -International in focus, publishing work from countries worldwide -Interdisciplinary, encouraging work which seeks to break down barriers that have isolated language teaching professionals from others concerned with pedagogy -Innovative, seeking to stimulate new avenues of enquiry, including ''action'' research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书