Construction of a process-driven 3D spatio-temporal model for precision soil remediation: Coupling dynamic retention with multi-objective cost optimization
Zhengda Lin, Bingjie Yan, Xinhao Sun, Caoqingqing Li, Liyan Liu, Dan Zhong, Jun Zhang
{"title":"Construction of a process-driven 3D spatio-temporal model for precision soil remediation: Coupling dynamic retention with multi-objective cost optimization","authors":"Zhengda Lin, Bingjie Yan, Xinhao Sun, Caoqingqing Li, Liyan Liu, Dan Zhong, Jun Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2026.109163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Current static approaches for quantifying soil pollution damage often hinder effective environmental management due to their reliance on single-point thresholds, simplified 2D spatial assumptions, and linear cost summations. These limitations fail to capture dynamic pollutant behaviors or account for implicit lifecycle losses, leading to suboptimal remediation decisions. To provide a robust scientific tool for precision management, this study constructs a Process-Driven 3D Spatio-Temporal Quantification (3D-STQ) model. This model is underpinned by a novel Dynamic Retention Equation for Soil Pollutants (DRE-SP), which systematically couples multi-source input fluxes, biodegradation, hydrodynamic migration, and adsorption-desorption kinetics. By integrating adaptive 3D meshing with the NSGA-II genetic algorithm, the model optimizes the trade-offs between remediation cost, time efficiency, and environmental risk. Field validation at an electroplating site demonstrated high precision, with a pollutant concentration coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) of 0.96 and a negligible 0.1% deviation in crop yield loss prediction. Furthermore, application at a pesticide-contaminated site revealed that the model-optimized strategy reduced total lifecycle costs by 32.2% and shortened project duration by 41.7% compared to traditional methods, while maintaining 96.2% prediction consistency. This study demonstrates that the proposed dynamic framework significantly enhances the accuracy of damage quantification, offering a valuable decision-support tool for sustainable contaminated site remediation and cost control.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 109163"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582026007809","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Current static approaches for quantifying soil pollution damage often hinder effective environmental management due to their reliance on single-point thresholds, simplified 2D spatial assumptions, and linear cost summations. These limitations fail to capture dynamic pollutant behaviors or account for implicit lifecycle losses, leading to suboptimal remediation decisions. To provide a robust scientific tool for precision management, this study constructs a Process-Driven 3D Spatio-Temporal Quantification (3D-STQ) model. This model is underpinned by a novel Dynamic Retention Equation for Soil Pollutants (DRE-SP), which systematically couples multi-source input fluxes, biodegradation, hydrodynamic migration, and adsorption-desorption kinetics. By integrating adaptive 3D meshing with the NSGA-II genetic algorithm, the model optimizes the trade-offs between remediation cost, time efficiency, and environmental risk. Field validation at an electroplating site demonstrated high precision, with a pollutant concentration coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.96 and a negligible 0.1% deviation in crop yield loss prediction. Furthermore, application at a pesticide-contaminated site revealed that the model-optimized strategy reduced total lifecycle costs by 32.2% and shortened project duration by 41.7% compared to traditional methods, while maintaining 96.2% prediction consistency. This study demonstrates that the proposed dynamic framework significantly enhances the accuracy of damage quantification, offering a valuable decision-support tool for sustainable contaminated site remediation and cost control.
期刊介绍:
The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice.
PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers.
PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.