Nano-enabled fertilization alters nitrogen release dynamics and improves fertilizer use efficiency by reducing volatilization and leaching losses: Insights from 15N tracing and kinetic modelling
Surya Teja Varanasi, Kannan Pandian, Meena Sadasivam, Raju Marimuthu, Prabu Padanillay Chidambaram, Raja Kalimuthu, Mohamed Roshan Abu Firnass Mustaffa
{"title":"Nano-enabled fertilization alters nitrogen release dynamics and improves fertilizer use efficiency by reducing volatilization and leaching losses: Insights from 15N tracing and kinetic modelling","authors":"Surya Teja Varanasi, Kannan Pandian, Meena Sadasivam, Raju Marimuthu, Prabu Padanillay Chidambaram, Raja Kalimuthu, Mohamed Roshan Abu Firnass Mustaffa","doi":"10.1039/d6en00403b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inefficient nitrogen (N) management in agroecosystems is largely driven by rapid nutrient release and substantial losses from conventional urea fertilizers, resulting in low nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and environmental concerns. This study evaluated the ability of nano-enabled fertilization to regulate N dynamics to better synchronize N availability with crop demand. An integrated framework combining soil incubation, ammonia volatilization, nitrate leaching and 15N isotopic tracing was employed to quantify N transformation, loss pathways and plant uptake. The results revealed that conventional urea exhibited rapid N release, reaching peak available nitrogen concentrations of 183.4 mg kg-1 within 3 weeks, whereas nano urea treatments delayed peak nitrogen availability to 6–7 weeks, indicating a sustained release pattern. This behaviour was supported by kinetic modelling, where first-order release rate constants were markedly lower under nano urea (0.115–0.151 week-1) than under conventional urea (0.664–0.753 week-1), confirming slower and more controlled nitrogen release The sustained release significantly reduced ammonia volatilization loss by 53% (11.7 vs 24.7 mg kg-1) and nitrate leaching at 30 cm depth by 39% (81 vs 133 mg kg-1) under nano urea treatments compared to conventional urea under controlled conditions. Moreover, the application of integrated treatment (75% conventional urea as soil application + two foliar sprays of nano urea at critical growth stages of maize) achieved the highest total N uptake (2909.14 vs 2556.92 mg plant-1) and enhanced NUE (46.47 vs 44.21%) compared to sole urea application. Therefore, these findings suggested that nano-enabled fertilization regulates N release kinetics, reduces loss pathways and improves NUE by enhancing temporal synchronization between N availability and plant demand.","PeriodicalId":73,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science: Nano","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science: Nano","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d6en00403b","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Inefficient nitrogen (N) management in agroecosystems is largely driven by rapid nutrient release and substantial losses from conventional urea fertilizers, resulting in low nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and environmental concerns. This study evaluated the ability of nano-enabled fertilization to regulate N dynamics to better synchronize N availability with crop demand. An integrated framework combining soil incubation, ammonia volatilization, nitrate leaching and 15N isotopic tracing was employed to quantify N transformation, loss pathways and plant uptake. The results revealed that conventional urea exhibited rapid N release, reaching peak available nitrogen concentrations of 183.4 mg kg-1 within 3 weeks, whereas nano urea treatments delayed peak nitrogen availability to 6–7 weeks, indicating a sustained release pattern. This behaviour was supported by kinetic modelling, where first-order release rate constants were markedly lower under nano urea (0.115–0.151 week-1) than under conventional urea (0.664–0.753 week-1), confirming slower and more controlled nitrogen release The sustained release significantly reduced ammonia volatilization loss by 53% (11.7 vs 24.7 mg kg-1) and nitrate leaching at 30 cm depth by 39% (81 vs 133 mg kg-1) under nano urea treatments compared to conventional urea under controlled conditions. Moreover, the application of integrated treatment (75% conventional urea as soil application + two foliar sprays of nano urea at critical growth stages of maize) achieved the highest total N uptake (2909.14 vs 2556.92 mg plant-1) and enhanced NUE (46.47 vs 44.21%) compared to sole urea application. Therefore, these findings suggested that nano-enabled fertilization regulates N release kinetics, reduces loss pathways and improves NUE by enhancing temporal synchronization between N availability and plant demand.
农业生态系统中氮素管理效率低下主要是由于养分快速释放和常规尿素肥料的大量损失,导致氮素利用效率低和环境问题。本研究评估了纳米施肥调节氮素动态的能力,以更好地同步氮素有效性与作物需求。采用土壤培养、氨挥发、硝态氮淋溶和15N同位素示踪相结合的综合框架,量化氮素转化、损失途径和植物吸收。结果表明,常规尿素处理的氮素释放速度较快,在3周内达到183.4 mg kg-1的有效氮浓度峰值,而纳米尿素处理的氮素有效氮浓度峰值延迟至6-7周,呈现缓释模式。动力学模型支持了这一行为,其中纳米尿素(0.115-0.151周-1)的一级释放速率常数明显低于常规尿素(0.664-0.753周-1)。与控制条件下的常规尿素相比,纳米尿素的持续释放显著减少了53%的氨挥发损失(11.7 vs 24.7 mg kg-1)和39%的30 cm深度的硝酸盐浸出(81 vs 133 mg kg-1)。此外,与单独施用尿素相比,施用综合处理(75%常规尿素作为土壤施用+玉米关键生育期两次叶面喷施纳米尿素)获得了最高的总氮吸收量(2909.14 mg vs 2556.92 mg plant-1)和更高的氮素利用效率(46.47 mg vs 44.21%)。因此,这些研究结果表明,纳米施肥通过增强氮素有效性和植物需要量之间的时间同步,调节氮素释放动力学,减少损失途径,提高氮素利用效率。
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science: Nano serves as a comprehensive and high-impact peer-reviewed source of information on the design and demonstration of engineered nanomaterials for environment-based applications. It also covers the interactions between engineered, natural, and incidental nanomaterials with biological and environmental systems. This scope includes, but is not limited to, the following topic areas:
Novel nanomaterial-based applications for water, air, soil, food, and energy sustainability
Nanomaterial interactions with biological systems and nanotoxicology
Environmental fate, reactivity, and transformations of nanoscale materials
Nanoscale processes in the environment
Sustainable nanotechnology including rational nanomaterial design, life cycle assessment, risk/benefit analysis