Antimicrobial Use in Livestock: The Economic Cost of Action or Inaction

IF 5.5 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Journal of Agricultural Economics Pub Date : 2026-09-12 Epub Date: 2026-05-11 DOI:10.1111/1477-9552.70041
Alejandro Acosta, Wondmagegn Tirkaso, Marco Artavia, Francesco Nicolli, Thomas Chatzopoulos, Sergio René Araujo-Enciso, Martin Cicowiez, Shaikh Eskander, Ramanan Laxminarayan, Junxia Song
{"title":"Antimicrobial Use in Livestock: The Economic Cost of Action or Inaction","authors":"Alejandro Acosta,&nbsp;Wondmagegn Tirkaso,&nbsp;Marco Artavia,&nbsp;Francesco Nicolli,&nbsp;Thomas Chatzopoulos,&nbsp;Sergio René Araujo-Enciso,&nbsp;Martin Cicowiez,&nbsp;Shaikh Eskander,&nbsp;Ramanan Laxminarayan,&nbsp;Junxia Song","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.70041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper quantifies the economy-wide consequences of two independent global stress-tests in livestock production. The first assesses the effects of phasing out antimicrobial growth promoters (AGPs), and the second evaluates the long-term impacts of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) progression. We use a sequential, one-way modelling framework combining a global partial equilibrium (PE) model and a global computable general equilibrium (CGE) model to trace how scenario-defined shocks in livestock production propagate through world agricultural markets and the wider economy. The highest-impact AGPs phase-out scenario results in cumulative global livestock production losses, valued at constant 2021–2023 prices, of roughly USD 53 billion over 2025–2040, with annual deviations that peak in the mid-2020s and then decline as output converges along scenario-defined recovery paths. In contrast, the highest-impact AMR scenario produces persistent and compounding reductions by construction, with cumulative production losses of about USD 318 billion by 2040, while cumulative economy-wide welfare losses in this high-impact case reach approximately USD 1.25 trillion, concentrated mainly in upper–middle-income countries. Results are scenario dependent by construction and represent indicative orders of magnitude rather than forecasts. The baseline implicitly reflects prevailing levels of AGPs and AMR embedded in historical production trends. The study provides a framework for quantifying the production effects of antimicrobial use (AMU) and their economy-wide spillovers, highlighting the asymmetric timing of the economic costs of action and inaction under the imposed scenario structure.</p>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"77 3","pages":"865-887"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1477-9552.70041","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1477-9552.70041","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper quantifies the economy-wide consequences of two independent global stress-tests in livestock production. The first assesses the effects of phasing out antimicrobial growth promoters (AGPs), and the second evaluates the long-term impacts of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) progression. We use a sequential, one-way modelling framework combining a global partial equilibrium (PE) model and a global computable general equilibrium (CGE) model to trace how scenario-defined shocks in livestock production propagate through world agricultural markets and the wider economy. The highest-impact AGPs phase-out scenario results in cumulative global livestock production losses, valued at constant 2021–2023 prices, of roughly USD 53 billion over 2025–2040, with annual deviations that peak in the mid-2020s and then decline as output converges along scenario-defined recovery paths. In contrast, the highest-impact AMR scenario produces persistent and compounding reductions by construction, with cumulative production losses of about USD 318 billion by 2040, while cumulative economy-wide welfare losses in this high-impact case reach approximately USD 1.25 trillion, concentrated mainly in upper–middle-income countries. Results are scenario dependent by construction and represent indicative orders of magnitude rather than forecasts. The baseline implicitly reflects prevailing levels of AGPs and AMR embedded in historical production trends. The study provides a framework for quantifying the production effects of antimicrobial use (AMU) and their economy-wide spillovers, highlighting the asymmetric timing of the economic costs of action and inaction under the imposed scenario structure.

家畜抗菌剂的使用:采取行动或不采取行动的经济代价
本文量化了畜牧生产中两个独立的全球压力测试的经济影响。第一项研究评估了逐步淘汰抗菌生长促进剂(AGPs)的影响,第二项研究评估了抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)进展的长期影响。我们使用一个顺序的单向建模框架,结合全球部分均衡(PE)模型和全球可计算一般均衡(CGE)模型来追踪情景定义的畜牧生产冲击如何通过世界农业市场和更广泛的经济传播。按2021-2023年不变价格计算,在2025-2040年期间,影响最大的AGPs逐步淘汰情景导致全球畜牧业生产累计损失约为530亿美元,年度偏差在2020年代中期达到峰值,然后随着产出沿情景定义的恢复路径趋同而下降。相比之下,在影响最大的AMR情景中,由于建设的原因,AMR会产生持续和复合的减少,到2040年,累计生产损失约为3180亿美元,而在这种高影响情景中,整个经济的累计福利损失约为1.25万亿美元,主要集中在中高收入国家。结果是情景依赖于结构和代表指示数量级,而不是预测。基线隐含地反映了隐含在历史生产趋势中的agp和AMR的普遍水平。该研究为量化抗菌药物使用(AMU)的生产效应及其在整个经济范围内的溢出效应提供了一个框架,强调了在强制情景结构下采取行动和不采取行动的经济成本的不对称时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural Economics
Journal of Agricultural Economics 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the Agricultural Economics Society, the Journal of Agricultural Economics is a leading international professional journal, providing a forum for research into agricultural economics and related disciplines such as statistics, marketing, business management, politics, history and sociology, and their application to issues in the agricultural, food, and related industries; rural communities, and the environment. Each issue of the JAE contains articles, notes and book reviews as well as information relating to the Agricultural Economics Society. Published 3 times a year, it is received by members and institutional subscribers in 69 countries. With contributions from leading international scholars, the JAE is a leading citation for agricultural economics and policy. Published articles either deal with new developments in research and methods of analysis, or apply existing methods and techniques to new problems and situations which are of general interest to the Journal’s international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书