Anna Lou Abatayo, Maartje Oostdijk, Andries Richter
{"title":"Emerging Fisheries and Public Opinion: Insights From a Survey Experiment on Mesopelagic Fishing","authors":"Anna Lou Abatayo, Maartje Oostdijk, Andries Richter","doi":"10.1111/faf.70100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Public acceptability of fisheries policy remains a key challenge for successful governance, constraining the set of feasible management options. To many, public opinion seems mysterious—rarely aligned with scientific evidence, yet not random, as it is shaped by frames, narratives and social factors. Here, we examine public acceptance of governing a new fishery through a survey experiment conducted in 10 countries. As a case, we consider the mesopelagic zone, a largely untapped resource with high biomass and economic potential. However, mesopelagic fishing also entails ecological and social risks, including impacts on food webs, carbon sequestration and global equity. Acceptance varied substantially across countries. Support was lower in wealthier countries, such as Germany and the Netherlands, where respondents also favoured stricter regulation, and higher in Indonesia, Nigeria, the Philippines, and, to a lesser extent, Spain, where support for regulation was weaker. Different frames have different effects across countries. For example, emphasizing risks to food webs reduced acceptance in Argentina and Nigeria, while highlighting disproportionate burdens on the Global South further lowered support only in Nigeria. At the individual level, confidence in government and large companies increased support for mesopelagic fishing, whereas other demographic factors played smaller roles. These findings emphasize the role of equity concerns and localized public opinion in shaping policy for fisheries and highlight the context-dependent power of narrative framing.</p>","PeriodicalId":169,"journal":{"name":"Fish and Fisheries","volume":"27 5","pages":"1074-1087"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/faf.70100","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fish and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/faf.70100","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Public acceptability of fisheries policy remains a key challenge for successful governance, constraining the set of feasible management options. To many, public opinion seems mysterious—rarely aligned with scientific evidence, yet not random, as it is shaped by frames, narratives and social factors. Here, we examine public acceptance of governing a new fishery through a survey experiment conducted in 10 countries. As a case, we consider the mesopelagic zone, a largely untapped resource with high biomass and economic potential. However, mesopelagic fishing also entails ecological and social risks, including impacts on food webs, carbon sequestration and global equity. Acceptance varied substantially across countries. Support was lower in wealthier countries, such as Germany and the Netherlands, where respondents also favoured stricter regulation, and higher in Indonesia, Nigeria, the Philippines, and, to a lesser extent, Spain, where support for regulation was weaker. Different frames have different effects across countries. For example, emphasizing risks to food webs reduced acceptance in Argentina and Nigeria, while highlighting disproportionate burdens on the Global South further lowered support only in Nigeria. At the individual level, confidence in government and large companies increased support for mesopelagic fishing, whereas other demographic factors played smaller roles. These findings emphasize the role of equity concerns and localized public opinion in shaping policy for fisheries and highlight the context-dependent power of narrative framing.
期刊介绍:
Fish and Fisheries adopts a broad, interdisciplinary approach to the subject of fish biology and fisheries. It draws contributions in the form of major synoptic papers and syntheses or meta-analyses that lay out new approaches, re-examine existing findings, methods or theory, and discuss papers and commentaries from diverse areas. Focal areas include fish palaeontology, molecular biology and ecology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, ecology, behaviour, evolutionary studies, conservation, assessment, population dynamics, mathematical modelling, ecosystem analysis and the social, economic and policy aspects of fisheries where they are grounded in a scientific approach. A paper in Fish and Fisheries must draw upon all key elements of the existing literature on a topic, normally have a broad geographic and/or taxonomic scope, and provide general points which make it compelling to a wide range of readers whatever their geographical location. So, in short, we aim to publish articles that make syntheses of old or synoptic, long-term or spatially widespread data, introduce or consolidate fresh concepts or theory, or, in the Ghoti section, briefly justify preliminary, new synoptic ideas. Please note that authors of submissions not meeting this mandate will be directed to the appropriate primary literature.