Mid‐Infrared Spectroscopy to Estimate Ratios of Soil Organic Carbon to Clay

IF 4.3 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE
Jonah M. Prout, Timo S. Breure, Keith D. Shepherd, Gifty E. Acquah, Franklin D. Hewlett, Steve P. McGrath, . Kirk, Stephan M. Haefele
{"title":"Mid‐Infrared Spectroscopy to Estimate Ratios of Soil Organic Carbon to Clay","authors":"Jonah M. Prout, Timo S. Breure, Keith D. Shepherd, Gifty E. Acquah, Franklin D. Hewlett, Steve P. McGrath, . Kirk, Stephan M. Haefele","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The index based on the ratio of soil organic carbon to clay concentration (SOC/clay) has been confirmed as an effective tool for assessing the organic matter status of mineral soils. The index contains four classes: very good (SOC/clay ≥ 1/8), good (1/10–1/8), moderate (1/13–1/10) and degraded (≤ 1/13). Conventional analyses of SOC and clay concentrations are resource intensive, however. Here, we investigate the use of mid‐infrared spectroscopy (MIRS) as an alternative for quantifying SOC/clay ratios and the index. We use data from the National Soil Inventory of England and Wales ( <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 1301). We obtained RMSE values of 3.6 and 57 g kg <jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> for estimations of SOC and clay concentrations by MIRS, respectively. We found that a simplified three‐class index was satisfactory for predictions using MIRS. The accuracy of clay concentration estimations was a limiting factor, particularly for the combined middle class (approx. 60%–70% success). Over 80% of the samples in the other two classes were correctly predicted. The probability that a sample was in the estimated index class can be used to filter out estimates likely to be misclassified. The filtering removed at least twice the number of misclassified samples as the number of correctly classified that had below‐threshold probability. We found that uncertainty estimates are more informative if calculated from the component estimates of SOC and clay rather than the SOC/clay ratio. An important source of uncertainty is the mismatch between MIRS estimates of clay concentration based on clay mineralogy and conventional estimates based on particle size fraction. The additional information on clay mineralogy given by MIRS means it provides a better characterisation of SOC–clay interactions affecting soil functioning.","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.70353","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The index based on the ratio of soil organic carbon to clay concentration (SOC/clay) has been confirmed as an effective tool for assessing the organic matter status of mineral soils. The index contains four classes: very good (SOC/clay ≥ 1/8), good (1/10–1/8), moderate (1/13–1/10) and degraded (≤ 1/13). Conventional analyses of SOC and clay concentrations are resource intensive, however. Here, we investigate the use of mid‐infrared spectroscopy (MIRS) as an alternative for quantifying SOC/clay ratios and the index. We use data from the National Soil Inventory of England and Wales ( n = 1301). We obtained RMSE values of 3.6 and 57 g kg −1 for estimations of SOC and clay concentrations by MIRS, respectively. We found that a simplified three‐class index was satisfactory for predictions using MIRS. The accuracy of clay concentration estimations was a limiting factor, particularly for the combined middle class (approx. 60%–70% success). Over 80% of the samples in the other two classes were correctly predicted. The probability that a sample was in the estimated index class can be used to filter out estimates likely to be misclassified. The filtering removed at least twice the number of misclassified samples as the number of correctly classified that had below‐threshold probability. We found that uncertainty estimates are more informative if calculated from the component estimates of SOC and clay rather than the SOC/clay ratio. An important source of uncertainty is the mismatch between MIRS estimates of clay concentration based on clay mineralogy and conventional estimates based on particle size fraction. The additional information on clay mineralogy given by MIRS means it provides a better characterisation of SOC–clay interactions affecting soil functioning.
中红外光谱法估算土壤有机碳与粘土的比值
基于土壤有机碳/粘土浓度的指标(SOC/clay)已被证实是评价矿质土壤有机质状态的有效工具。该指标分为非常好(SOC/clay≥1/8)、良好(1/10-1/8)、中等(1/13 - 1/10)和退化(≤1/13)四个等级。然而,传统的有机碳和粘土浓度分析是资源密集型的。在这里,我们研究了使用中红外光谱(MIRS)作为定量有机碳/粘土比和指数的替代方法。我们使用的数据来自英格兰和威尔士国家土壤调查(n = 1301)。我们得到的RMSE值分别为3.6和57 g kg - 1。我们发现一个简化的三级指数对使用MIRS进行预测是满意的。粘土浓度估计的准确性是一个限制因素,特别是对于合并的中产阶级(约为100万美元)。成功60% - -70%)。另外两类中超过80%的样本被正确预测。样本在估计的索引类别中的概率可以用来过滤掉可能被错误分类的估计。过滤去除的错误分类样本数量至少是正确分类样本数量的两倍,这些样本的分类概率低于阈值。我们发现,如果从有机碳和粘土组分的估计中计算,而不是从有机碳/粘土比中计算,则不确定性估计的信息更丰富。不确定性的一个重要来源是基于粘土矿学的MIRS估计值与基于粒度分数的常规估计值之间的不匹配。由MIRS提供的粘土矿物学的附加信息意味着它提供了一个更好的表征soc -粘土相互作用影响土壤功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Science
European Journal of Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: The EJSS is an international journal that publishes outstanding papers in soil science that advance the theoretical and mechanistic understanding of physical, chemical and biological processes and their interactions in soils acting from molecular to continental scales in natural and managed environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书