Rebecca L. Pedler, Matthew S. Bansemer, James O. Harris, Ondi L. Crino, Malgorzata Lagisz
{"title":"Dietary Supplements and Biological Performance in Abalone: A Systematic Evidence Map","authors":"Rebecca L. Pedler, Matthew S. Bansemer, James O. Harris, Ondi L. Crino, Malgorzata Lagisz","doi":"10.1111/raq.70167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abalone in the genus <jats:italic>Haliotis</jats:italic> are economically important for aquaculture. Abalone naturally graze on macroalgae; however, they are increasingly fed formulated pellets that lack essential nutrients in aquaculture. Dietary supplements may increase abalone growth performance, immunity, survival, and market traits. Despite these advantages, there has been limited industry uptake, which can be influenced by a lack of formal evidence synthesis on the topic. Here, we provide the first systematic evidence map summarizing global research on the effects of dietary supplements on biological performance in abalone, based on 143 studies meeting inclusion criteria. China‐affiliated researchers authored most articles while Australia and New Zealand had disproportionately high, and South Korea disproportionately low contribution relative to production, which may have been influenced by indexing and linguistic restrictions. Algal and/or diatom meals were the most tested dietary supplements (19.6%), with most efforts focused on <jats:italic>Ulva</jats:italic> spp. supplementation. Vitamins were also intensively researched (18.2%), with emphasis on those that are water soluble. Growth performance and survival were the most frequently assessed outcomes (72.0% and 58.0% respectively). Consumer‐focused traits, such as sensory attributes and abalone colour, were measured by less than 10% of articles, suggesting a bias toward production‐centric outcomes. No studies provided raw data, source code, or pre‐registered protocols, and future abalone research should adopt best practices for data credibility. Our map provides direction for future empirical studies and meta‐analyses by highlighting research trends, gaps, and evidence clusters, which will assist in greater translation of research on dietary supplements to the abalone industry.","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":"441 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Aquaculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.70167","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abalone in the genus Haliotis are economically important for aquaculture. Abalone naturally graze on macroalgae; however, they are increasingly fed formulated pellets that lack essential nutrients in aquaculture. Dietary supplements may increase abalone growth performance, immunity, survival, and market traits. Despite these advantages, there has been limited industry uptake, which can be influenced by a lack of formal evidence synthesis on the topic. Here, we provide the first systematic evidence map summarizing global research on the effects of dietary supplements on biological performance in abalone, based on 143 studies meeting inclusion criteria. China‐affiliated researchers authored most articles while Australia and New Zealand had disproportionately high, and South Korea disproportionately low contribution relative to production, which may have been influenced by indexing and linguistic restrictions. Algal and/or diatom meals were the most tested dietary supplements (19.6%), with most efforts focused on Ulva spp. supplementation. Vitamins were also intensively researched (18.2%), with emphasis on those that are water soluble. Growth performance and survival were the most frequently assessed outcomes (72.0% and 58.0% respectively). Consumer‐focused traits, such as sensory attributes and abalone colour, were measured by less than 10% of articles, suggesting a bias toward production‐centric outcomes. No studies provided raw data, source code, or pre‐registered protocols, and future abalone research should adopt best practices for data credibility. Our map provides direction for future empirical studies and meta‐analyses by highlighting research trends, gaps, and evidence clusters, which will assist in greater translation of research on dietary supplements to the abalone industry.
期刊介绍:
Reviews in Aquaculture is a journal that aims to provide a platform for reviews on various aspects of aquaculture science, techniques, policies, and planning. The journal publishes fully peer-reviewed review articles on topics including global, regional, and national production and market trends in aquaculture, advancements in aquaculture practices and technology, interactions between aquaculture and the environment, indigenous and alien species in aquaculture, genetics and its relation to aquaculture, as well as aquaculture product quality and traceability. The journal is indexed and abstracted in several databases including AgBiotech News & Information (CABI), AgBiotechNet, Agricultural Engineering Abstracts, Environment Index (EBSCO Publishing), SCOPUS (Elsevier), and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) among others.