Dietary Supplements and Biological Performance in Abalone: A Systematic Evidence Map

IF 13.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES
Rebecca L. Pedler, Matthew S. Bansemer, James O. Harris, Ondi L. Crino, Malgorzata Lagisz
{"title":"Dietary Supplements and Biological Performance in Abalone: A Systematic Evidence Map","authors":"Rebecca L. Pedler, Matthew S. Bansemer, James O. Harris, Ondi L. Crino, Malgorzata Lagisz","doi":"10.1111/raq.70167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abalone in the genus <jats:italic>Haliotis</jats:italic> are economically important for aquaculture. Abalone naturally graze on macroalgae; however, they are increasingly fed formulated pellets that lack essential nutrients in aquaculture. Dietary supplements may increase abalone growth performance, immunity, survival, and market traits. Despite these advantages, there has been limited industry uptake, which can be influenced by a lack of formal evidence synthesis on the topic. Here, we provide the first systematic evidence map summarizing global research on the effects of dietary supplements on biological performance in abalone, based on 143 studies meeting inclusion criteria. China‐affiliated researchers authored most articles while Australia and New Zealand had disproportionately high, and South Korea disproportionately low contribution relative to production, which may have been influenced by indexing and linguistic restrictions. Algal and/or diatom meals were the most tested dietary supplements (19.6%), with most efforts focused on <jats:italic>Ulva</jats:italic> spp. supplementation. Vitamins were also intensively researched (18.2%), with emphasis on those that are water soluble. Growth performance and survival were the most frequently assessed outcomes (72.0% and 58.0% respectively). Consumer‐focused traits, such as sensory attributes and abalone colour, were measured by less than 10% of articles, suggesting a bias toward production‐centric outcomes. No studies provided raw data, source code, or pre‐registered protocols, and future abalone research should adopt best practices for data credibility. Our map provides direction for future empirical studies and meta‐analyses by highlighting research trends, gaps, and evidence clusters, which will assist in greater translation of research on dietary supplements to the abalone industry.","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":"441 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Aquaculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.70167","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abalone in the genus Haliotis are economically important for aquaculture. Abalone naturally graze on macroalgae; however, they are increasingly fed formulated pellets that lack essential nutrients in aquaculture. Dietary supplements may increase abalone growth performance, immunity, survival, and market traits. Despite these advantages, there has been limited industry uptake, which can be influenced by a lack of formal evidence synthesis on the topic. Here, we provide the first systematic evidence map summarizing global research on the effects of dietary supplements on biological performance in abalone, based on 143 studies meeting inclusion criteria. China‐affiliated researchers authored most articles while Australia and New Zealand had disproportionately high, and South Korea disproportionately low contribution relative to production, which may have been influenced by indexing and linguistic restrictions. Algal and/or diatom meals were the most tested dietary supplements (19.6%), with most efforts focused on Ulva spp. supplementation. Vitamins were also intensively researched (18.2%), with emphasis on those that are water soluble. Growth performance and survival were the most frequently assessed outcomes (72.0% and 58.0% respectively). Consumer‐focused traits, such as sensory attributes and abalone colour, were measured by less than 10% of articles, suggesting a bias toward production‐centric outcomes. No studies provided raw data, source code, or pre‐registered protocols, and future abalone research should adopt best practices for data credibility. Our map provides direction for future empirical studies and meta‐analyses by highlighting research trends, gaps, and evidence clusters, which will assist in greater translation of research on dietary supplements to the abalone industry.
鲍鱼的膳食补充剂和生物学性能:一个系统的证据图
鲍鱼属在水产养殖中具有重要的经济价值。鲍鱼以大型藻类为食;然而,在水产养殖中,他们越来越多地饲喂缺乏必需营养素的配方颗粒。膳食补充剂可提高鲍鱼的生长性能、免疫力、成活率和市场性状。尽管有这些优点,但由于缺乏关于该专题的正式证据综合,工业吸收有限。在这里,我们提供了第一个系统的证据图,总结了全球关于膳食补充剂对鲍鱼生物性能影响的研究,基于143项符合纳入标准的研究。与中国相关的研究人员撰写了大多数文章,而澳大利亚和新西兰的贡献相对于产量的贡献高得不成比例,韩国的贡献低得不成比例,这可能受到索引和语言限制的影响。藻类和/或硅藻膳食是测试最多的膳食补充剂(19.6%),主要集中在Ulva类补充剂上。维生素也被深入研究(18.2%),重点是水溶性维生素。生长性能和生存是最常见的评估结果(分别为72.0%和58.0%)。不到10%的文章测量了以消费者为中心的特征,如感官属性和鲍鱼的颜色,这表明人们倾向于以生产为中心的结果。没有研究提供原始数据、源代码或预先注册的方案,未来的鲍鱼研究应采用数据可信度的最佳实践。我们的地图通过突出研究趋势、差距和证据集群,为未来的实证研究和meta分析提供了方向,这将有助于将膳食补充剂研究更大程度地转化为鲍鱼产业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
24.80
自引率
5.80%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reviews in Aquaculture is a journal that aims to provide a platform for reviews on various aspects of aquaculture science, techniques, policies, and planning. The journal publishes fully peer-reviewed review articles on topics including global, regional, and national production and market trends in aquaculture, advancements in aquaculture practices and technology, interactions between aquaculture and the environment, indigenous and alien species in aquaculture, genetics and its relation to aquaculture, as well as aquaculture product quality and traceability. The journal is indexed and abstracted in several databases including AgBiotech News & Information (CABI), AgBiotechNet, Agricultural Engineering Abstracts, Environment Index (EBSCO Publishing), SCOPUS (Elsevier), and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书