The Effect of Instructional Choice on Classroom Behavior: A Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Research

IF 1.5 3区 心理学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Sarah Wilkinson, Eleanor M. Hancock, Caitlyn E. Majeika, Joseph H. Wehby, Brandi Simonsen
{"title":"The Effect of Instructional Choice on Classroom Behavior: A Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Research","authors":"Sarah Wilkinson, Eleanor M. Hancock, Caitlyn E. Majeika, Joseph H. Wehby, Brandi Simonsen","doi":"10.1177/10983007261435206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Because research has shown that strong academic instruction also supports classroom behavior, this meta-analysis examined the empirical evidence supporting the use of instructional choice as a classroom management strategy. We aimed to describe the characteristics of the literature base, calculate the average effect of instructional choice on classroom behavior, and identify the variables that contributed to heterogeneity within findings. We searched for published and gray literature across seven databases. Studies eligible for inclusion (a) took place in grades K-12 educational settings, (b) used instructional choice as the primary intervention, (c) measured student behavioral outcomes, and (d) were conducted using a single-case research design. The analysis includes 34 studies, including 89 individual students and 170 cases. We found instructional choice significantly increased desired classroom behaviors (log response ratio [ <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">LRR</jats:italic> ] = .186, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [.042, .330]), but did not significantly decrease challenging behaviors ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">LRR</jats:italic> = −.468, 95% CI = [−1.1, .163]). Moderator analyses indicated instructional choice is associated with significantly larger increases in behavior for secondary students and when preference assessments are not given. Primary limitations included unexplained heterogeneity and evolving procedures for conducting single-case meta-analyses. Implications for research and practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47652,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions","volume":"254 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007261435206","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Because research has shown that strong academic instruction also supports classroom behavior, this meta-analysis examined the empirical evidence supporting the use of instructional choice as a classroom management strategy. We aimed to describe the characteristics of the literature base, calculate the average effect of instructional choice on classroom behavior, and identify the variables that contributed to heterogeneity within findings. We searched for published and gray literature across seven databases. Studies eligible for inclusion (a) took place in grades K-12 educational settings, (b) used instructional choice as the primary intervention, (c) measured student behavioral outcomes, and (d) were conducted using a single-case research design. The analysis includes 34 studies, including 89 individual students and 170 cases. We found instructional choice significantly increased desired classroom behaviors (log response ratio [ LRR ] = .186, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [.042, .330]), but did not significantly decrease challenging behaviors ( LRR = −.468, 95% CI = [−1.1, .163]). Moderator analyses indicated instructional choice is associated with significantly larger increases in behavior for secondary students and when preference assessments are not given. Primary limitations included unexplained heterogeneity and evolving procedures for conducting single-case meta-analyses. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
教学选择对课堂行为的影响:单个案研究的元分析
由于研究表明,强有力的学术指导也支持课堂行为,本荟萃分析检验了支持使用教学选择作为课堂管理策略的经验证据。我们的目的是描述文献基础的特征,计算教学选择对课堂行为的平均影响,并确定导致研究结果异质性的变量。我们在七个数据库中检索了已发表的和灰色的文献。符合纳入条件的研究(a)发生在K-12年级的教育环境中,(b)使用教学选择作为主要干预措施,(c)测量学生行为结果,(d)使用单例研究设计进行。该分析包括34项研究,包括89名学生和170个案例。我们发现教学选择显著增加了期望的课堂行为(对数反应比[LRR] = 0.186, 95%可信区间[CI] =[)。042年,。[330]),但没有显著降低挑战性行为(LRR =−)。468, 95% ci =[−1.1,.163])。主持人分析表明,当没有给出偏好评估时,教学选择与中学生行为的显著增加有关。主要限制包括无法解释的异质性和进行单例荟萃分析的不断发展的程序。讨论了对研究和实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: ...offers sound, research-based principles of positive behavior support for use in school, home and community settings with people with challenges in behavioral adaptation. Regular features include empirical research; discussion, literature reviews, and conceptual papers; programs, practices, and innovations; forum; and media reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书