“We, the conspiracy theorists.” How people do symbolic boundary work in the “Great Reset” debates across social media platforms

IF 4.6 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Kamile Grusauskaite, Matthias De Bondt, Lars de Wildt, Stef Aupers
{"title":"“We, the conspiracy theorists.” How people do symbolic boundary work in the “Great Reset” debates across social media platforms","authors":"Kamile Grusauskaite, Matthias De Bondt, Lars de Wildt, Stef Aupers","doi":"10.1177/14614448261446590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conspiracy theories spread rapidly on social media. A growing field of research has examined how social media platforms shape conspiracy narratives and cultures. However, this technological focus has largely overshadowed social media users’ own agency toward collective identity construction. This article examines how users in online conspiracy communities construct collective identities through symbolic boundary work. Focusing on discussions surrounding the “Great Reset” conspiracy theory, across six major social media platforms (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter/X, YouTube, Reddit, and TikTok), we use multimodal discourse analysis to analyze 630 posts and their comments. Our findings reveal that users do symbolic boundary work by defining themselves as “critical thinkers,” reclaiming the label “conspiracy theorist,” and affectively transforming personal struggles into shared narratives, creating a shared identity in contrast to the “mainstream other.” The study contributes to research on social media and conspiracy cultures by foregrounding identity over content, offering insight into how users build solidarity online.","PeriodicalId":19149,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Media & Society","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448261446590","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conspiracy theories spread rapidly on social media. A growing field of research has examined how social media platforms shape conspiracy narratives and cultures. However, this technological focus has largely overshadowed social media users’ own agency toward collective identity construction. This article examines how users in online conspiracy communities construct collective identities through symbolic boundary work. Focusing on discussions surrounding the “Great Reset” conspiracy theory, across six major social media platforms (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter/X, YouTube, Reddit, and TikTok), we use multimodal discourse analysis to analyze 630 posts and their comments. Our findings reveal that users do symbolic boundary work by defining themselves as “critical thinkers,” reclaiming the label “conspiracy theorist,” and affectively transforming personal struggles into shared narratives, creating a shared identity in contrast to the “mainstream other.” The study contributes to research on social media and conspiracy cultures by foregrounding identity over content, offering insight into how users build solidarity online.
“我们,阴谋论者。”人们如何在跨社交媒体平台的“大重置”辩论中发挥象征性边界的作用
阴谋论在社交媒体上迅速传播。越来越多的研究领域研究了社交媒体平台如何塑造阴谋叙事和文化。然而,这种对技术的关注在很大程度上掩盖了社交媒体用户自己对集体身份建构的代理。本文探讨了网络阴谋社区的用户如何通过符号边界工作构建集体身份。我们关注六大社交媒体平台(Facebook、Instagram、Twitter/X、YouTube、Reddit和TikTok)围绕“大重置”阴谋论的讨论,使用多模态话语分析来分析630篇帖子及其评论。我们的研究结果表明,用户通过将自己定义为“批判性思考者”来进行象征性的边界工作,收回“阴谋理论家”的标签,并有效地将个人斗争转化为共享叙事,创造与“主流他者”相反的共享身份。该研究通过将身份置于内容之上,为社交媒体和阴谋文化的研究做出了贡献,为用户如何在网上建立团结提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
New Media & Society
New Media & Society COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
274
期刊介绍: New Media & Society engages in critical discussions of the key issues arising from the scale and speed of new media development, drawing on a wide range of disciplinary perspectives and on both theoretical and empirical research. The journal includes contributions on: -the individual and the social, the cultural and the political dimensions of new media -the global and local dimensions of the relationship between media and social change -contemporary as well as historical developments -the implications and impacts of, as well as the determinants and obstacles to, media change the relationship between theory, policy and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书