{"title":"Limited Math: Aligning Mathematical Semantics with Finite Computation","authors":"Lian Wen","doi":"10.1007/s10699-026-10036-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Classical mathematical frameworks used in the semantics of computation and programming languages are traditionally grounded in idealized abstractions, including infinite-precision numbers, unbounded sets, and unrestricted operations. Concrete computation, however, is intrinsically finite, operating under explicit bounds on precision, memory, and structural resources. This foundational mismatch complicates semantic reasoning about numerical behavior, algebraic properties, and execution in realistic computational settings. This paper proposes <jats:italic>Limited Math</jats:italic> (LM), a bounded foundational framework intended to realign mathematical semantics with the realities of finite computation. Rather than presenting a complete formal theory or establishing meta-theoretical results, LM is introduced as a conceptual foundation in which finiteness is made explicit at the semantic level. Numeric magnitude, precision, and structural complexity are treated as primitive constraints, enforced through a finite numeric domain parameterized by a single bound <jats:inline-formula> <jats:tex-math>$$M$$</jats:tex-math> </jats:inline-formula> and a deterministic value-mapping operator that makes quantization and boundary behavior explicit. Within representable bounds, LM coincides with classical arithmetic; beyond these bounds, deviations are explicit, deterministic, and open to analysis rather than implicit or idealized. By additionally bounding structural constructions such as set cardinality, the framework prevents infinitary assumptions from re-entering through indirect means. The resulting semantics induces finite-state models of computation, offering a principled basis for reasoning about arithmetic, structure, and execution under finite computational constraints and for guiding future formal and technical developments.","PeriodicalId":55146,"journal":{"name":"Foundations of Science","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foundations of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-026-10036-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Classical mathematical frameworks used in the semantics of computation and programming languages are traditionally grounded in idealized abstractions, including infinite-precision numbers, unbounded sets, and unrestricted operations. Concrete computation, however, is intrinsically finite, operating under explicit bounds on precision, memory, and structural resources. This foundational mismatch complicates semantic reasoning about numerical behavior, algebraic properties, and execution in realistic computational settings. This paper proposes Limited Math (LM), a bounded foundational framework intended to realign mathematical semantics with the realities of finite computation. Rather than presenting a complete formal theory or establishing meta-theoretical results, LM is introduced as a conceptual foundation in which finiteness is made explicit at the semantic level. Numeric magnitude, precision, and structural complexity are treated as primitive constraints, enforced through a finite numeric domain parameterized by a single bound $$M$$ and a deterministic value-mapping operator that makes quantization and boundary behavior explicit. Within representable bounds, LM coincides with classical arithmetic; beyond these bounds, deviations are explicit, deterministic, and open to analysis rather than implicit or idealized. By additionally bounding structural constructions such as set cardinality, the framework prevents infinitary assumptions from re-entering through indirect means. The resulting semantics induces finite-state models of computation, offering a principled basis for reasoning about arithmetic, structure, and execution under finite computational constraints and for guiding future formal and technical developments.
期刊介绍:
Foundations of Science focuses on methodological and philosophical topics of foundational significance concerning the structure and the growth of science. It serves as a forum for exchange of views and ideas among working scientists and theorists of science and it seeks to promote interdisciplinary cooperation.
Since the various scientific disciplines have become so specialized and inaccessible to workers in different areas of science, one of the goals of the journal is to present the foundational issues of science in a way that is free from unnecessary technicalities yet faithful to the scientific content. The aim of the journal is not simply to identify and highlight foundational issues and problems, but to suggest constructive solutions to the problems.
The editors of the journal admit that various sciences have approaches and methods that are peculiar to those individual sciences. However, they hold the view that important truths can be discovered about and by the sciences and that truths transcend cultural and political contexts. Although properly conducted historical and sociological inquiries can explain some aspects of the scientific enterprise, the editors believe that the central foundational questions of contemporary science can be posed and answered without recourse to sociological or historical methods.