Limited Math: Aligning Mathematical Semantics with Finite Computation

IF 1.2 4区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Lian Wen
{"title":"Limited Math: Aligning Mathematical Semantics with Finite Computation","authors":"Lian Wen","doi":"10.1007/s10699-026-10036-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Classical mathematical frameworks used in the semantics of computation and programming languages are traditionally grounded in idealized abstractions, including infinite-precision numbers, unbounded sets, and unrestricted operations. Concrete computation, however, is intrinsically finite, operating under explicit bounds on precision, memory, and structural resources. This foundational mismatch complicates semantic reasoning about numerical behavior, algebraic properties, and execution in realistic computational settings. This paper proposes <jats:italic>Limited Math</jats:italic> (LM), a bounded foundational framework intended to realign mathematical semantics with the realities of finite computation. Rather than presenting a complete formal theory or establishing meta-theoretical results, LM is introduced as a conceptual foundation in which finiteness is made explicit at the semantic level. Numeric magnitude, precision, and structural complexity are treated as primitive constraints, enforced through a finite numeric domain parameterized by a single bound <jats:inline-formula> <jats:tex-math>$$M$$</jats:tex-math> </jats:inline-formula> and a deterministic value-mapping operator that makes quantization and boundary behavior explicit. Within representable bounds, LM coincides with classical arithmetic; beyond these bounds, deviations are explicit, deterministic, and open to analysis rather than implicit or idealized. By additionally bounding structural constructions such as set cardinality, the framework prevents infinitary assumptions from re-entering through indirect means. The resulting semantics induces finite-state models of computation, offering a principled basis for reasoning about arithmetic, structure, and execution under finite computational constraints and for guiding future formal and technical developments.","PeriodicalId":55146,"journal":{"name":"Foundations of Science","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foundations of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-026-10036-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Classical mathematical frameworks used in the semantics of computation and programming languages are traditionally grounded in idealized abstractions, including infinite-precision numbers, unbounded sets, and unrestricted operations. Concrete computation, however, is intrinsically finite, operating under explicit bounds on precision, memory, and structural resources. This foundational mismatch complicates semantic reasoning about numerical behavior, algebraic properties, and execution in realistic computational settings. This paper proposes Limited Math (LM), a bounded foundational framework intended to realign mathematical semantics with the realities of finite computation. Rather than presenting a complete formal theory or establishing meta-theoretical results, LM is introduced as a conceptual foundation in which finiteness is made explicit at the semantic level. Numeric magnitude, precision, and structural complexity are treated as primitive constraints, enforced through a finite numeric domain parameterized by a single bound $$M$$ and a deterministic value-mapping operator that makes quantization and boundary behavior explicit. Within representable bounds, LM coincides with classical arithmetic; beyond these bounds, deviations are explicit, deterministic, and open to analysis rather than implicit or idealized. By additionally bounding structural constructions such as set cardinality, the framework prevents infinitary assumptions from re-entering through indirect means. The resulting semantics induces finite-state models of computation, offering a principled basis for reasoning about arithmetic, structure, and execution under finite computational constraints and for guiding future formal and technical developments.
有限数学:将数学语义与有限计算对齐
在计算语义和编程语言中使用的经典数学框架传统上以理想化抽象为基础,包括无限精度数、无界集合和无限制操作。然而,具体计算本质上是有限的,在精度、内存和结构资源的明确限制下运行。这种基本的不匹配使关于数值行为、代数属性和实际计算设置中的执行的语义推理变得复杂。本文提出了有限数学(LM),这是一个有限的基础框架,旨在将数学语义与有限计算的现实重新结合起来。LM不是提出完整的形式理论或建立元理论结果,而是作为概念基础引入,其中在语义层面上明确了有限性。数值大小、精度和结构复杂性被视为基本约束,通过由单个边界$$M$$和确定性值映射操作符参数化的有限数值域强制执行,该操作符使量化和边界行为显式。在可表示的范围内,LM与经典算法一致;超出这些界限,偏差是明确的,确定的,开放的分析,而不是隐含的或理想化的。通过对结构结构(如集合基数)的附加约束,框架可以防止无限假设通过间接方式重新进入。由此产生的语义归纳了计算的有限状态模型,为在有限计算约束下推理算法、结构和执行提供了原则性基础,并为指导未来的形式和技术发展提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foundations of Science
Foundations of Science HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Foundations of Science focuses on methodological and philosophical topics of foundational significance concerning the structure and the growth of science. It serves as a forum for exchange of views and ideas among working scientists and theorists of science and it seeks to promote interdisciplinary cooperation. Since the various scientific disciplines have become so specialized and inaccessible to workers in different areas of science, one of the goals of the journal is to present the foundational issues of science in a way that is free from unnecessary technicalities yet faithful to the scientific content. The aim of the journal is not simply to identify and highlight foundational issues and problems, but to suggest constructive solutions to the problems. The editors of the journal admit that various sciences have approaches and methods that are peculiar to those individual sciences. However, they hold the view that important truths can be discovered about and by the sciences and that truths transcend cultural and political contexts. Although properly conducted historical and sociological inquiries can explain some aspects of the scientific enterprise, the editors believe that the central foundational questions of contemporary science can be posed and answered without recourse to sociological or historical methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书