JORGE PENA-MARIN, MATHEW S. ISAAC, JENNIFER SEOKHWA HONG
{"title":"EXPRESS: Going Smaller with Precise Numbers: How Numerical Precision Orients Attention and Shifts Attribute Weighting in Consumer Judgments","authors":"JORGE PENA-MARIN, MATHEW S. ISAAC, JENNIFER SEOKHWA HONG","doi":"10.1177/00222429261465366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When choosing from a product assortment, consumers often compare options on multiple product attributes (e.g., energy usage, processor speed). These attributes may be displayed with more precise numbers (e.g., 12.34) or less precise numbers (e.g., 12). The present research shows that when attribute values are communicated more (vs. less) precisely, consumers weight smaller-is-better attributes (e.g., energy usage)—for which smaller numbers are generally preferred—relatively more in their decision making. Furthermore, building on an association between precise numbers and smaller magnitudes, the authors provide evidence that this difference in attribute weighting occurs because numerical precision orients consumers’ attention toward the smaller (and therefore more favorable) values of smaller-is-better attributes. This shift in attention causes smaller-is-better attributes to be weighted more heavily during multi-attribute comparison, which affects consumer evaluations and choice. Findings from nine studies (four of which are reported in the Web Appendix), including a field study with a real estate website, offer triangulating evidence for the proposed theorizing and contribute to several streams of research within judgment and decision making, including attribute weighting and numerical cognition.","PeriodicalId":16152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marketing","volume":"132 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429261465366","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
When choosing from a product assortment, consumers often compare options on multiple product attributes (e.g., energy usage, processor speed). These attributes may be displayed with more precise numbers (e.g., 12.34) or less precise numbers (e.g., 12). The present research shows that when attribute values are communicated more (vs. less) precisely, consumers weight smaller-is-better attributes (e.g., energy usage)—for which smaller numbers are generally preferred—relatively more in their decision making. Furthermore, building on an association between precise numbers and smaller magnitudes, the authors provide evidence that this difference in attribute weighting occurs because numerical precision orients consumers’ attention toward the smaller (and therefore more favorable) values of smaller-is-better attributes. This shift in attention causes smaller-is-better attributes to be weighted more heavily during multi-attribute comparison, which affects consumer evaluations and choice. Findings from nine studies (four of which are reported in the Web Appendix), including a field study with a real estate website, offer triangulating evidence for the proposed theorizing and contribute to several streams of research within judgment and decision making, including attribute weighting and numerical cognition.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1936,the Journal of Marketing (JM) serves as a premier outlet for substantive research in marketing. JM is dedicated to developing and disseminating knowledge about real-world marketing questions, catering to scholars, educators, managers, policy makers, consumers, and other global societal stakeholders. Over the years,JM has played a crucial role in shaping the content and boundaries of the marketing discipline.