Ego depletion and empathy: exploring self-regulatory resource depletion in hostage and crisis negotiators

IF 2.5 2区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Benjamin Zaiser, Jon C. Cole, Mario S. Staller, Amy R. Grubb
{"title":"Ego depletion and empathy: exploring self-regulatory resource depletion in hostage and crisis negotiators","authors":"Benjamin Zaiser, Jon C. Cole, Mario S. Staller, Amy R. Grubb","doi":"10.1007/s11292-026-09750-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives This study aimed to determine the effect of ego depletion (i.e. mental fatigue or self-control exhaustion) on hostage and crisis negotiators’ capacity to communicate empathy. Methods Two randomized controlled experiments with a within-subjects design assessed the ego depletion effect on 52 police negotiators during a simulated hostage situation. Experiment 1 employed a validated manipulation task established in ego depletion literature, while Experiment 2 used the cold pressor task, borrowed from medical literature. Empathy was measured using self-reports, validated third-party assessments, and testing. Results Experiment 1 failed to induce ego depletion, while Experiment 2 successfully induced ego depletion. However, no statistically significant differences in empathy were observed between experimental and control conditions. Conclusions The findings do not provide evidence that ego depletion reduces empathic responding in crisis negotiators under the conditions tested. Instead, they suggest that any effects of ego depletion on empathy may be context-dependent. Factors such as training and professional role may play a moderating role, although these were not directly examined. Accordingly, the results should be interpreted as exploratory and highlight the need for further research.","PeriodicalId":47684,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Criminology","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-026-09750-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to determine the effect of ego depletion (i.e. mental fatigue or self-control exhaustion) on hostage and crisis negotiators’ capacity to communicate empathy. Methods Two randomized controlled experiments with a within-subjects design assessed the ego depletion effect on 52 police negotiators during a simulated hostage situation. Experiment 1 employed a validated manipulation task established in ego depletion literature, while Experiment 2 used the cold pressor task, borrowed from medical literature. Empathy was measured using self-reports, validated third-party assessments, and testing. Results Experiment 1 failed to induce ego depletion, while Experiment 2 successfully induced ego depletion. However, no statistically significant differences in empathy were observed between experimental and control conditions. Conclusions The findings do not provide evidence that ego depletion reduces empathic responding in crisis negotiators under the conditions tested. Instead, they suggest that any effects of ego depletion on empathy may be context-dependent. Factors such as training and professional role may play a moderating role, although these were not directly examined. Accordingly, the results should be interpreted as exploratory and highlight the need for further research.
自我耗竭与共情:人质与危机谈判者自我调节资源耗竭的探讨
本研究旨在探讨自我耗竭(即精神疲劳或自我控制耗竭)对人质和危机谈判者共情沟通能力的影响。方法采用受试者内随机对照实验,对52名警察谈判人员在模拟人质事件中的自我消耗效应进行了评估。实验1采用自我耗竭文献中建立的经过验证的操作任务,实验2采用借鉴医学文献的冷压任务。共情是通过自我报告、经过验证的第三方评估和测试来衡量的。结果实验1诱导自我枯竭失败,实验2诱导自我枯竭成功。然而,在实验条件和控制条件之间,共情没有统计学上的显著差异。结论在测试条件下,研究结果并未提供证据证明自我耗尽会降低危机谈判者的共情反应。相反,他们认为,自我耗尽对同理心的任何影响都可能与情境有关。培训和专业角色等因素可能起到缓和作用,尽管这些因素没有被直接审查。因此,结果应被解释为探索性的,并强调进一步研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Criminology
Journal of Experimental Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Criminology focuses on high quality experimental and quasi-experimental research in the advancement of criminological theory and/or the development of evidence based crime and justice policy. The journal is also committed to the advancement of the science of systematic reviews and experimental methods in criminology and criminal justice. The journal seeks empirical papers on experimental and quasi-experimental studies, systematic reviews on substantive criminological and criminal justice issues, and methodological papers on experimentation and systematic review. The journal encourages submissions from scholars in the broad array of scientific disciplines that are concerned with criminology as well as crime and justice problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书