{"title":"Anti-Racism Football Campaigns in Spain and England: Public Discourse and Polarization on X","authors":"Alberto Álvarez-Álvarez, Peter Kerkhof","doi":"10.1177/21674795261453828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The efforts of institutions to eradicate hate both within and beyond the sporting domain have led professional football leagues such as the Premier League and La Liga to develop their own anti-racism campaigns. This study examines X users’ reactions to posts published by each competition under the slogans <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">No Room for Racism</jats:italic> and <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">LaLiga VS Racismo</jats:italic> . Through a longitudinal, mixed-method analysis, ( <jats:inline-formula> <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" overflow=\"scroll\"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> </jats:inline-formula> = 238) posts and ( <jats:inline-formula> <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" overflow=\"scroll\"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> </jats:inline-formula> = 20,329) responses were examined to assess the evolution of online discourse, the level of hostility, and the degree of polarization surrounding these campaigns. Our findings indicate that hostile discourse tends to emerge sporadically, particularly in response to visible social events rather than as a direct consequence of the campaigns themselves. Qualitative analysis further shows that a substantial proportion of toxic or negative responses does not stem from overtly racist discourse, but from users criticizing the perceived effectiveness or constituency of the campaigns. The results also reveal differences between the two leagues: while the Premier League exhibits a relatively balanced distribution of positive and negative responses, La Liga is characterized by a predominance of negative affect. These findings contribute to the literature on sport, racism and digital polarization by showing how institutional anti-racism campaigns become embedded in broader conflicts over their legitimacy and effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":46882,"journal":{"name":"Communication & Sport","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication & Sport","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795261453828","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The efforts of institutions to eradicate hate both within and beyond the sporting domain have led professional football leagues such as the Premier League and La Liga to develop their own anti-racism campaigns. This study examines X users’ reactions to posts published by each competition under the slogans No Room for Racism and LaLiga VS Racismo . Through a longitudinal, mixed-method analysis, ( N = 238) posts and ( N = 20,329) responses were examined to assess the evolution of online discourse, the level of hostility, and the degree of polarization surrounding these campaigns. Our findings indicate that hostile discourse tends to emerge sporadically, particularly in response to visible social events rather than as a direct consequence of the campaigns themselves. Qualitative analysis further shows that a substantial proportion of toxic or negative responses does not stem from overtly racist discourse, but from users criticizing the perceived effectiveness or constituency of the campaigns. The results also reveal differences between the two leagues: while the Premier League exhibits a relatively balanced distribution of positive and negative responses, La Liga is characterized by a predominance of negative affect. These findings contribute to the literature on sport, racism and digital polarization by showing how institutional anti-racism campaigns become embedded in broader conflicts over their legitimacy and effectiveness.
各机构为消除体育领域内外的仇恨所做的努力,促使英超和西甲等职业足球联盟开展了自己的反种族主义运动。这项研究调查了X名用户对每个比赛在No Room for Racism和LaLiga VS Racismo口号下发布的帖子的反应。通过纵向混合方法分析,研究了(N = 238)个帖子和(N = 20,329)个回复,以评估在线话语的演变、敌意的程度以及围绕这些活动的两极分化程度。我们的研究结果表明,敌对言论往往是零星出现的,特别是在对可见的社会事件的回应中,而不是作为运动本身的直接后果。定性分析进一步表明,很大一部分有毒或负面反应并非来自公开的种族主义言论,而是来自用户批评运动的有效性或选民。结果还揭示了两个联赛之间的差异:英超联赛表现出相对平衡的积极和消极反应分布,而西甲联赛的特点是消极影响占主导地位。这些发现为体育、种族主义和数字两极分化的文献做出了贡献,展示了制度性反种族主义运动是如何在其合法性和有效性方面陷入更广泛的冲突的。