A Scale for Mixed Reasons for Belief

Noûs Pub Date : 2026-06-11 DOI:10.1111/nous.70049
Matthew Vermaire
{"title":"A Scale for Mixed Reasons for Belief","authors":"Matthew Vermaire","doi":"10.1111/nous.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Epistemic reasons matter for what you should believe. But then, some think there are practical reasons that matter, too. How could both sorts of reasons be weighed together to determine the doxastic states you ought to hold, all things considered? I argue for general constraints on any way of understanding such combinations and offer a well‐motivated decision‐theoretic model that, unlike its competitors, meets them. When epistemic reasons are conceived of as arising from the value or disvalue of a true or false belief, they can be weighed with practical reasons on a common scale.","PeriodicalId":501006,"journal":{"name":"Noûs","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Noûs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.70049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Epistemic reasons matter for what you should believe. But then, some think there are practical reasons that matter, too. How could both sorts of reasons be weighed together to determine the doxastic states you ought to hold, all things considered? I argue for general constraints on any way of understanding such combinations and offer a well‐motivated decision‐theoretic model that, unlike its competitors, meets them. When epistemic reasons are conceived of as arising from the value or disvalue of a true or false belief, they can be weighed with practical reasons on a common scale.
一个混合信仰原因的量表
认识论的原因决定了你应该相信什么。但是,一些人认为还有一些实际原因也很重要。这两种原因如何权衡在一起来决定你应该持有的专制状态,考虑到所有的事情?我主张对理解这种组合的任何方式的一般约束,并提供一个动机良好的决策理论模型,与它的竞争对手不同,它满足这些约束。当认识论的原因被认为是由一个正确或错误的信念的价值或不价值引起的,它们可以在一个共同的尺度上与实际原因进行权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书