The foreign language effect in the illusion of causality: Evidence of absence

IF 2.4 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Stefano Dalla Bona, Eduardo Navarrete, Michele Vicovaro
{"title":"The foreign language effect in the illusion of causality: Evidence of absence","authors":"Stefano Dalla Bona, Eduardo Navarrete, Michele Vicovaro","doi":"10.1017/s1366728926101412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent research suggests that a cognitive bias, the illusion of causality, can be attenuated when the task is presented in a foreign language (Díaz-Lago &amp; Matute, 2019a, <jats:italic>Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology</jats:italic> , 72(1), 41–51), supporting the well-known foreign language effect on decision making and reasoning. We conducted a replication study with a large sample ( <jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 220), determined through a Bayes factor design analysis, but our results did not support the original findings. This finding challenges the generalizability of the foreign language effect on reducing cognitive biases. Additionally, we found that the magnitude of the illusion decreased with increasing years of formal education and was generally weaker among male participants compared to females. These findings emphasize the importance of using samples with balanced demographic characteristics to avoid potential confounds in between-group comparisons. Overall, our study highlights the need for further research to clarify the conditions under which the foreign language effect can influence cognitive biases.","PeriodicalId":8758,"journal":{"name":"Bilingualism: Language and Cognition","volume":"245 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bilingualism: Language and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728926101412","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent research suggests that a cognitive bias, the illusion of causality, can be attenuated when the task is presented in a foreign language (Díaz-Lago & Matute, 2019a, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 72(1), 41–51), supporting the well-known foreign language effect on decision making and reasoning. We conducted a replication study with a large sample ( N = 220), determined through a Bayes factor design analysis, but our results did not support the original findings. This finding challenges the generalizability of the foreign language effect on reducing cognitive biases. Additionally, we found that the magnitude of the illusion decreased with increasing years of formal education and was generally weaker among male participants compared to females. These findings emphasize the importance of using samples with balanced demographic characteristics to avoid potential confounds in between-group comparisons. Overall, our study highlights the need for further research to clarify the conditions under which the foreign language effect can influence cognitive biases.
因果幻觉中的外语效应:缺失的证据
最近的研究表明,当任务以外语呈现时,认知偏差,即因果关系的幻觉可以减弱(Díaz-Lago & Matute, 20119a, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(1), 41-51),这支持了众所周知的外语对决策和推理的影响。我们通过贝叶斯因子设计分析进行了一项大样本(N = 220)的重复研究,但我们的结果不支持最初的发现。这一发现挑战了外语效应在减少认知偏差方面的普遍性。此外,我们发现这种错觉的程度随着受正规教育年限的增加而下降,并且在男性参与者中普遍比女性弱。这些发现强调了在组间比较中使用具有均衡人口统计学特征的样本以避免潜在混淆的重要性。总的来说,我们的研究强调需要进一步的研究来阐明外语效应影响认知偏见的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书