Single-Session Psychoeducation for Social Anxiety Mental Health Literacy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

IF 2.1 4区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK
Lele Feng, Jiaqi Deng, Yiming Qin, Liechuan Cui, Xiaoyu Zhuang, Xinfeng Tang
{"title":"Single-Session Psychoeducation for Social Anxiety Mental Health Literacy: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Lele Feng, Jiaqi Deng, Yiming Qin, Liechuan Cui, Xiaoyu Zhuang, Xinfeng Tang","doi":"10.1177/10497315261455809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This randomized controlled trial aimed to examine the effectiveness of a three-hour intervention on mental health literacy and symptoms of social anxiety among university students. Methods: A total of 86 participants were randomly assigned to an intervention group ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n</jats:italic> = 43) or a waitlist control group ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n</jats:italic> = 43). Assessments were completed at pretest (T1), posttest (T2), one-month follow-up (T3), and three-month follow-up (T4). Results: Compared with the control group, the intervention group showed significant improvements in mental health literacy, including increased knowledge ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">d</jats:italic> <jats:sub>T2</jats:sub> = 2.19, <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">d</jats:italic> <jats:sub>T3</jats:sub> = 1.46, <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">d</jats:italic> <jats:sub>T4</jats:sub> = 1.29), reduced stigma ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">d</jats:italic> <jats:sub>T2</jats:sub> = –0.94, <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">d</jats:italic> <jats:sub>T3</jats:sub> = –0.99, <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">d</jats:italic> <jats:sub>T4</jats:sub> = –0.71), and more positive help-seeking attitude ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">d</jats:italic> <jats:sub>T2</jats:sub> = 0.59, <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">d</jats:italic> <jats:sub>T3</jats:sub> = 0.44). However, no significant change was observed in social anxiety symptoms. Discussion: The single-session psychoeducational intervention effectively enhanced university students’ mental health literacy related to social anxiety. However, it did not significantly change social anxiety symptoms.","PeriodicalId":47993,"journal":{"name":"Research on Social Work Practice","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research on Social Work Practice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315261455809","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This randomized controlled trial aimed to examine the effectiveness of a three-hour intervention on mental health literacy and symptoms of social anxiety among university students. Methods: A total of 86 participants were randomly assigned to an intervention group ( n = 43) or a waitlist control group ( n = 43). Assessments were completed at pretest (T1), posttest (T2), one-month follow-up (T3), and three-month follow-up (T4). Results: Compared with the control group, the intervention group showed significant improvements in mental health literacy, including increased knowledge ( d T2 = 2.19, d T3 = 1.46, d T4 = 1.29), reduced stigma ( d T2 = –0.94, d T3 = –0.99, d T4 = –0.71), and more positive help-seeking attitude ( d T2 = 0.59, d T3 = 0.44). However, no significant change was observed in social anxiety symptoms. Discussion: The single-session psychoeducational intervention effectively enhanced university students’ mental health literacy related to social anxiety. However, it did not significantly change social anxiety symptoms.
社会焦虑心理健康素养单期心理教育:一项随机对照试验
目的:本随机对照试验旨在检验三小时干预对大学生心理健康素养和社交焦虑症状的有效性。方法:86名参与者被随机分为干预组(n = 43)和候补对照组(n = 43)。分别于测试前(T1)、测试后(T2)、1个月随访(T3)和3个月随访(T4)完成评估。结果:与对照组比较,干预组心理健康素养显著提高,包括知识水平提高(d T2 = 2.19, d T3 = 1.46, d T4 = 1.29),污名化程度降低(d T2 = -0.94, d T3 = -0.99, d T4 = -0.71),积极求助态度提高(d T2 = 0.59, d T3 = 0.44)。然而,社交焦虑症状没有明显变化。讨论:单次心理教育干预有效提高了大学生社交焦虑相关心理健康素养。然而,它并没有显著改变社交焦虑症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
105
期刊介绍: Research on Social Work Practice, sponsored by the Society for Social Work and Research, is a disciplinary journal devoted to the publication of empirical research concerning the methods and outcomes of social work practice. Social work practice is broadly interpreted to refer to the application of intentionally designed social work intervention programs to problems of societal and/or interpersonal importance, including behavior analysis or psychotherapy involving individuals; case management; practice involving couples, families, and small groups; community practice education; and the development, implementation, and evaluation of social policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书