Happiness and Single Parenthood: A Literature Review Using an Online Findings Archive

IF 3.7 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Susanne Elsas, Teresa Möhrle, Ruut Veenhoven
{"title":"Happiness and Single Parenthood: A Literature Review Using an Online Findings Archive","authors":"Susanne Elsas, Teresa Möhrle, Ruut Veenhoven","doi":"10.1007/s10902-026-01030-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many isolated findings suggest that single parents report, on average, lower levels of happiness than others. These others, however, are not a single homogeneous group, and definitions vary according to the specific research question. Consequently, the picture of single parents’ happiness is still scattered. Drawing on the World Database of Happiness, we review systematically described research findings in a standardised manner, aiming to provide an overview of the association between single parenthood and happiness. Conclusions are based on findings from 54 publications, which analysed quantitative data and are spread over most countries of the Global North, covering the period from 1972 to 2020. This literature review shows that in nearly all countries covered, independent of historical time and irrespective of different definitions of single parenthood, single parents are, on average, less happy than other parents but, in certain conditions, happier than other individuals living without a partner. Various forms of informal support, employment, and the use of childcare are positively associated with single parents’ happiness. The review also reveals that single fathers are still not the focus of happiness research, nor are macro-level associations with single parents’ happiness.","PeriodicalId":15837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Happiness Studies","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Happiness Studies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-026-01030-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many isolated findings suggest that single parents report, on average, lower levels of happiness than others. These others, however, are not a single homogeneous group, and definitions vary according to the specific research question. Consequently, the picture of single parents’ happiness is still scattered. Drawing on the World Database of Happiness, we review systematically described research findings in a standardised manner, aiming to provide an overview of the association between single parenthood and happiness. Conclusions are based on findings from 54 publications, which analysed quantitative data and are spread over most countries of the Global North, covering the period from 1972 to 2020. This literature review shows that in nearly all countries covered, independent of historical time and irrespective of different definitions of single parenthood, single parents are, on average, less happy than other parents but, in certain conditions, happier than other individuals living without a partner. Various forms of informal support, employment, and the use of childcare are positively associated with single parents’ happiness. The review also reveals that single fathers are still not the focus of happiness research, nor are macro-level associations with single parents’ happiness.
幸福和单身父母:使用在线发现档案的文献综述
许多孤立的研究结果表明,平均而言,单亲父母的幸福水平比其他人低。然而,这些其他的不是一个单一的同质群体,定义根据具体的研究问题而变化。因此,单亲父母的幸福图景仍然是分散的。利用世界幸福数据库,我们以标准化的方式系统地回顾了描述的研究结果,旨在提供单身父母与幸福之间关系的概述。这些结论基于54份出版物的研究结果,这些出版物分析了全球北方大多数国家的定量数据,涵盖1972年至2020年期间。这篇文献综述表明,在几乎所有涵盖的国家,无论历史时间如何,也无论单亲父母的定义如何,单亲父母平均比其他父母更不幸福,但在某些情况下,比其他没有伴侣的人更幸福。各种形式的非正式支持、就业和儿童保育与单亲父母的幸福感呈正相关。该调查还显示,单亲父亲仍然不是幸福研究的重点,也不是宏观层面上与单亲父母幸福的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
110
期刊介绍: The international peer-reviewed Journal of Happiness Studies is devoted to theoretical and applied advancements in all areas of well-being research. It covers topics referring to both the hedonic and eudaimonic perspectives characterizing well-being studies. The former includes the investigation of cognitive dimensions such as satisfaction with life, and positive affect and emotions. The latter includes the study of constructs and processes related to optimal psychological functioning, such as meaning and purpose in life, character strengths, personal growth, resilience, optimism, hope, and self-determination. In addition to contributions on appraisal of life-as-a-whole, the journal accepts papers investigating these topics in relation to specific domains, such as family, education, physical and mental health, and work. The journal welcomes high-quality theoretical and empirical submissions in the fields of economics, psychology and sociology, as well as contributions from researchers in the domains of education, medicine, philosophy and other related fields. The Journal of Happiness Studies provides a forum for three main areas in happiness research: 1) theoretical conceptualizations of well-being, happiness and the good life; 2) empirical investigation of well-being and happiness in different populations, contexts and cultures; 3) methodological advancements and development of new assessment instruments. The journal addresses the conceptualization, operationalization and measurement of happiness and well-being dimensions, as well as the individual, socio-economic and cultural factors that may interact with them as determinants or outcomes. Central Questions include, but are not limited to: Conceptualization: What meanings are denoted by terms like happiness and well-being? How do these fit in with broader conceptions of the good life? Operationalization and Measurement: Which methods can be used to assess how people feel about life? How to operationalize a new construct or an understudied dimension in the well-being domain? What are the best measures for investigating specific well-being related constructs and dimensions? Prevalence and causality Do individuals belonging to different populations and cultures vary in their well-being ratings? How does individual well-being relate to social and economic phenomena (characteristics, circumstances, behavior, events, and policies)? What are the personal, social and economic determinants and causes of individual well-being dimensions? Evaluation: What are the consequences of well-being for individual development and socio-economic progress? Are individual happiness and well-being worthwhile goals for governments and policy makers? Does well-being represent a useful parameter to orient planning in physical and mental healthcare, and in public health? Interdisciplinary studies: How has the study of happiness developed within and across disciplines? Can we link philosophical thought and empirical research? What are the biological correlates of well-being dimensions?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书