Auditory perceptual maps in humans and mice share common structures and predict perceptual decisions in discrimination learning.

IF 6.4
Johannes P-H Seiler, Giuseppe Cazzetta, Aida Ghobadi, Simon Rumpel
{"title":"Auditory perceptual maps in humans and mice share common structures and predict perceptual decisions in discrimination learning.","authors":"Johannes P-H Seiler, Giuseppe Cazzetta, Aida Ghobadi, Simon Rumpel","doi":"10.1038/s44271-026-00485-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To efficiently perceive sensory information and guide behavior, the brain organizes incoming sensory stimuli into internal maps that capture perceptual relatedness between stimuli. Whether these maps, typically assessed in scaling paradigms without feedback, also shape perceptual decisions during reinforcement-based conditions remains unclear. Here, we assess task-naïve perceptual maps from similarity judgments of pulsed sound stimuli, and compare them to perceptual maps obtained from multiple discrimination tasks in humans (n = 152) and mice (n = 11). We find that task-naïve maps predict how well humans discriminate sounds, how quickly they learn, and which stimulus features guide their choices. Moreover, naïve and task-based maps share key structures, suggesting a stable perceptual map architecture throughout learning. Remarkably, human task-based and task-naïve perceptual maps share key features and structures with the task-based perceptual maps of mice, indicating congruent structures of auditory perception across species. Together, our results indicate that perception relies on robust internal maps that provide a common framework to flexibly guide behavior in changing environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":501698,"journal":{"name":"Communications Psychology","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13282483/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-026-00485-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To efficiently perceive sensory information and guide behavior, the brain organizes incoming sensory stimuli into internal maps that capture perceptual relatedness between stimuli. Whether these maps, typically assessed in scaling paradigms without feedback, also shape perceptual decisions during reinforcement-based conditions remains unclear. Here, we assess task-naïve perceptual maps from similarity judgments of pulsed sound stimuli, and compare them to perceptual maps obtained from multiple discrimination tasks in humans (n = 152) and mice (n = 11). We find that task-naïve maps predict how well humans discriminate sounds, how quickly they learn, and which stimulus features guide their choices. Moreover, naïve and task-based maps share key structures, suggesting a stable perceptual map architecture throughout learning. Remarkably, human task-based and task-naïve perceptual maps share key features and structures with the task-based perceptual maps of mice, indicating congruent structures of auditory perception across species. Together, our results indicate that perception relies on robust internal maps that provide a common framework to flexibly guide behavior in changing environments.

人类和小鼠的听觉感知图具有共同的结构,并预测辨别学习中的感知决策。
为了有效地感知感官信息并指导行为,大脑将传入的感官刺激组织成内部地图,以捕捉刺激之间的感知相关性。这些地图,通常在没有反馈的尺度范式中评估,是否也在基于强化的条件下塑造感知决策仍不清楚。在这里,我们评估了脉冲声刺激相似性判断的task-naïve感知图,并将其与人类(n = 152)和小鼠(n = 11)的多重识别任务获得的感知图进行了比较。我们发现task-naïve地图预测了人类辨别声音的能力,他们学习的速度,以及哪些刺激特征指导了他们的选择。此外,naïve和基于任务的地图共享关键结构,表明在整个学习过程中存在稳定的感知地图架构。值得注意的是,人类基于任务的感知图和task-naïve感知图与小鼠基于任务的感知图共享关键特征和结构,这表明跨物种的听觉感知结构是一致的。总之,我们的研究结果表明,感知依赖于强大的内部地图,这些地图提供了一个共同的框架,可以在不断变化的环境中灵活地指导行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书