Toward clinical implementation of free visual exploration in neglect diagnostics: Reference data and psychometric properties across adulthood.

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Michael Jehle, Manuela Pastore-Wapp, Dario Cazzoli, Thomas Nyffeler, Brigitte C Kaufmann
{"title":"Toward clinical implementation of free visual exploration in neglect diagnostics: Reference data and psychometric properties across adulthood.","authors":"Michael Jehle, Manuela Pastore-Wapp, Dario Cazzoli, Thomas Nyffeler, Brigitte C Kaufmann","doi":"10.1080/09602011.2026.2687603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neglect after stroke is a common cognitive deficit and an important predictor of poor functional recovery. Video-oculography during Free Visual Exploration (FVE) has emerged as a sensitive and reliable method for detecting neglect and assessing overt visuo-spatial attention. However, broader clinical application remains limited by the absence of clinically usable reference standards and uncertainty regarding age effects. To address this gap, we established the reference framework required for clinically interpretable use of FVE across adulthood and clarified which FVE measures can be interpreted independently of age and which require age-aware interpretation. Data from 84 neurotypical participants aged 20-89 years were analysed using two FVE versions. Mean gaze position, the primary neglect marker, was not affected by age. Fixation duration and cumulative fixation duration likewise showed no age effect. Predefined neglect cut-offs retained high specificity (>95%). Older participants showed reduced mean number of fixations, as well as a reduced peripheral exploration, reflected by smaller exploration range and exploration area, indicating that these variables require age-aware interpretation. Test-retest reliability was good across variables, supporting repeated use over time. These findings support broader clinical implementation of FVE as a brief, efficient, and ecologically relevant tool for neglect assessment in clinical practice and research.</p>","PeriodicalId":54729,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2026.2687603","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neglect after stroke is a common cognitive deficit and an important predictor of poor functional recovery. Video-oculography during Free Visual Exploration (FVE) has emerged as a sensitive and reliable method for detecting neglect and assessing overt visuo-spatial attention. However, broader clinical application remains limited by the absence of clinically usable reference standards and uncertainty regarding age effects. To address this gap, we established the reference framework required for clinically interpretable use of FVE across adulthood and clarified which FVE measures can be interpreted independently of age and which require age-aware interpretation. Data from 84 neurotypical participants aged 20-89 years were analysed using two FVE versions. Mean gaze position, the primary neglect marker, was not affected by age. Fixation duration and cumulative fixation duration likewise showed no age effect. Predefined neglect cut-offs retained high specificity (>95%). Older participants showed reduced mean number of fixations, as well as a reduced peripheral exploration, reflected by smaller exploration range and exploration area, indicating that these variables require age-aware interpretation. Test-retest reliability was good across variables, supporting repeated use over time. These findings support broader clinical implementation of FVE as a brief, efficient, and ecologically relevant tool for neglect assessment in clinical practice and research.

在忽视诊断中自由视觉探索的临床实施:参考数据和成年心理测量特性。
中风后的忽视是常见的认知缺陷,也是功能恢复不良的重要预测因素。自由视觉探索(Free Visual Exploration, FVE)过程中的视频视觉术(Video-oculography)已成为一种检测忽视和评估显性视觉空间注意的敏感而可靠的方法。然而,由于缺乏临床可用的参考标准和年龄影响的不确定性,更广泛的临床应用仍然受到限制。为了解决这一差距,我们建立了成年期临床解释FVE所需的参考框架,并澄清了哪些FVE测量可以独立于年龄解释,哪些需要年龄意识解释。来自84名20-89岁的神经正常参与者的数据使用两种FVE版本进行分析。平均凝视位置,主要的忽视标志,不受年龄的影响。注视时间和累计注视时间同样没有年龄效应。预定义的忽略截止值保留了高特异性(>95%)。年龄较大的参与者平均注视次数减少,周边探索减少,这反映在较小的探索范围和探索区域上,表明这些变量需要年龄意识的解释。测试-重测试的可靠性在变量之间都很好,支持随着时间的推移重复使用。这些发现支持在临床实践和研究中将FVE作为一种简短、有效和生态相关的忽视评估工具进行更广泛的临床实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation publishes human experimental and clinical research related to rehabilitation, recovery of function, and brain plasticity. The journal is aimed at clinicians who wish to inform their practice in the light of the latest scientific research; at researchers in neurorehabilitation; and finally at researchers in cognitive neuroscience and related fields interested in the mechanisms of recovery and rehabilitation. Papers on neuropsychological assessment will be considered, and special topic reviews (2500-5000 words) addressing specific key questions in rehabilitation, recovery and brain plasticity will also be welcomed. The latter will enter a fast-track refereeing process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书