Group, Subgroup and Person-Specific Longitudinal Associations Between Physical Activity and Affect in Individuals With and Without Depressive and Anxiety Disorders

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Noa van Zwieten, George Aalbers, Femke Lamers, Harriëtte Riese, Manon H. J. Hillegers, Brenda W. J. H. Penninx
{"title":"Group, Subgroup and Person-Specific Longitudinal Associations Between Physical Activity and Affect in Individuals With and Without Depressive and Anxiety Disorders","authors":"Noa van Zwieten,&nbsp;George Aalbers,&nbsp;Femke Lamers,&nbsp;Harriëtte Riese,&nbsp;Manon H. J. Hillegers,&nbsp;Brenda W. J. H. Penninx","doi":"10.1002/mpr.70085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Associations between physical activity and affect (activity-affect dynamics) vary among individuals for which reasons remain unclear. We examined whether such heterogeneity is explained by psychiatric status or sociodemographic, clinical, and ambulatory assessment characteristics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Two-week ambulatory assessment data of 300 participants with current (<i>n</i> = 79), subthreshold (<i>n</i> = 67), and no (<i>n</i> = 154) depressive and/or anxiety disorders or symptoms were obtained from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety. Positive and negative affect (PA/NA) were assessed with ecological momentary assessment (5xdaily) and physical activity using actigraphy. Group iterative multiple model estimation was used to model associations shared across the sample, psychiatric subgroups, and those specific to individuals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>No activity-affect associations were shared across the sample (i.e., present in &gt; 75% of all individuals) or psychiatric subgroups (i.e., present in &gt; 51% of individuals within subgroups). Nevertheless, 45% of participants had at least one activity-affect association, with considerable heterogeneity in their nature. The most frequent association was a positive contemporaneous association between physical activity and PA (present in 25% of the sample).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These findings suggest large heterogeneity in activity-affect dynamics among individuals and underscore the importance of considering the unique dynamics of the individual.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50310,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research","volume":"35 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mpr.70085","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mpr.70085","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Associations between physical activity and affect (activity-affect dynamics) vary among individuals for which reasons remain unclear. We examined whether such heterogeneity is explained by psychiatric status or sociodemographic, clinical, and ambulatory assessment characteristics.

Methods

Two-week ambulatory assessment data of 300 participants with current (n = 79), subthreshold (n = 67), and no (n = 154) depressive and/or anxiety disorders or symptoms were obtained from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety. Positive and negative affect (PA/NA) were assessed with ecological momentary assessment (5xdaily) and physical activity using actigraphy. Group iterative multiple model estimation was used to model associations shared across the sample, psychiatric subgroups, and those specific to individuals.

Results

No activity-affect associations were shared across the sample (i.e., present in > 75% of all individuals) or psychiatric subgroups (i.e., present in > 51% of individuals within subgroups). Nevertheless, 45% of participants had at least one activity-affect association, with considerable heterogeneity in their nature. The most frequent association was a positive contemporaneous association between physical activity and PA (present in 25% of the sample).

Conclusions

These findings suggest large heterogeneity in activity-affect dynamics among individuals and underscore the importance of considering the unique dynamics of the individual.

Abstract Image

在有或没有抑郁和焦虑障碍的个体中,身体活动和情绪之间的组、亚组和个体特异性纵向关联。
目的:身体活动和情感(活动-情感动力学)之间的关联因个体而异,其原因尚不清楚。我们检查了这种异质性是否可以用精神状态或社会人口学、临床和门诊评估特征来解释。方法:从荷兰抑郁与焦虑研究中获得300名患有当前(n = 79)、阈下(n = 67)和无(n = 154)抑郁和/或焦虑障碍或症状的参与者的两周动态评估数据。积极和消极影响(PA/NA)分别采用生态瞬间评估(每日5次)和身体活动记录仪评估。使用群体迭代多模型估计来模拟样本、精神病学亚组和个体特有的关联。结果:在整个样本(即,在所有个体中存在> 75%)或精神病学亚组(即,在亚组中存在> 51%的个体)中没有活动影响关联。然而,45%的参与者至少有一种活动影响关联,其性质具有相当大的异质性。最常见的关联是身体活动与PA之间的正相关(25%的样本存在)。结论:这些发现表明个体之间的活动-影响动力学存在很大的异质性,并强调了考虑个体独特动力学的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research (MPR) publishes high-standard original research of a technical, methodological, experimental and clinical nature, contributing to the theory, methodology, practice and evaluation of mental and behavioural disorders. The journal targets in particular detailed methodological and design papers from major national and international multicentre studies. There is a close working relationship with the US National Institute of Mental Health, the World Health Organisation (WHO) Diagnostic Instruments Committees, as well as several other European and international organisations. MPR aims to publish rapidly articles of highest methodological quality in such areas as epidemiology, biostatistics, generics, psychopharmacology, psychology and the neurosciences. Articles informing about innovative and critical methodological, statistical and clinical issues, including nosology, can be submitted as regular papers and brief reports. Reviews are only occasionally accepted. MPR seeks to monitor, discuss, influence and improve the standards of mental health and behavioral neuroscience research by providing a platform for rapid publication of outstanding contributions. As a quarterly journal MPR is a major source of information and ideas and is an important medium for students, clinicians and researchers in psychiatry, clinical psychology, epidemiology and the allied disciplines in the mental health field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书