The STEADY diabetic foot ulcer registry: methods, insights, and future directions.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Jared R Adams, Jennifer N Lannon, Vickie R Driver, David Alper, Cyaandi R Dove, John C Lantis, Joseph Rolley, Robert Snyder
{"title":"The STEADY diabetic foot ulcer registry: methods, insights, and future directions.","authors":"Jared R Adams, Jennifer N Lannon, Vickie R Driver, David Alper, Cyaandi R Dove, John C Lantis, Joseph Rolley, Robert Snyder","doi":"10.25270/wnds/26010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a major cause of morbidity, amputation, and mortality among individuals with diabetes, with disproportionate impact on underserved populations. Comprehensive real-world data on DFU management and outcomes are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the design and methodology of the STEADY (Structured Evaluation and Analysis of Diabetic Foot Ulcers in the US) registry, a national prospective cohort study of patients with DFUs in the United States whose objective is to evaluate DFU treatment patterns, outcomes, and health care resource utilization in real-world settings, to assess comparative effectiveness, cost effectiveness, and safety of DFU therapies and therapy combinations, and to advance disease management through risk- and site-stratified treatment optimization models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>STEADY is a 10-year prospective multicenter observational study with an aim of enrolling 5000 adults with active DFUs in the United States. Data sources include electronic case report forms, electronic medical records (EMRs), patient-reported outcomes via mobile app, and optional insurance claims. Primary and secondary end points will include time and incidence of partial and complete wound closure; wound and disease characteristics; rates of recurrence, infection, ischemic events, and amputation; health care utilization, including surgical procedures; health-related quality of life; work productivity; and additional patient reported outcomes. Descriptive, survival, and comparative effectiveness analyses will be performed. Data governance ensures full regulatory compliance and robust data security and integrity, supporting the potential use of the registry dataset as a synthetic control arm in future clinical research.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>STEADY leverages an artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled platform to integrate multisource data, including wound photography, social determinants of health, patient reported outcomes and caregiver information. The platform uses AI for transcription and interpretation of patient and provider dictation, supports patient-controlled EMR synchronization for comprehensive longitudinal tracking across providers, offers participant incentives to enhance engagement, and ensures rigorous, automated data quality assurance at all stages.</p>","PeriodicalId":23752,"journal":{"name":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","volume":"38 4","pages":"97-106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/wnds/26010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a major cause of morbidity, amputation, and mortality among individuals with diabetes, with disproportionate impact on underserved populations. Comprehensive real-world data on DFU management and outcomes are lacking.

Objective: To describe the design and methodology of the STEADY (Structured Evaluation and Analysis of Diabetic Foot Ulcers in the US) registry, a national prospective cohort study of patients with DFUs in the United States whose objective is to evaluate DFU treatment patterns, outcomes, and health care resource utilization in real-world settings, to assess comparative effectiveness, cost effectiveness, and safety of DFU therapies and therapy combinations, and to advance disease management through risk- and site-stratified treatment optimization models.

Methods: STEADY is a 10-year prospective multicenter observational study with an aim of enrolling 5000 adults with active DFUs in the United States. Data sources include electronic case report forms, electronic medical records (EMRs), patient-reported outcomes via mobile app, and optional insurance claims. Primary and secondary end points will include time and incidence of partial and complete wound closure; wound and disease characteristics; rates of recurrence, infection, ischemic events, and amputation; health care utilization, including surgical procedures; health-related quality of life; work productivity; and additional patient reported outcomes. Descriptive, survival, and comparative effectiveness analyses will be performed. Data governance ensures full regulatory compliance and robust data security and integrity, supporting the potential use of the registry dataset as a synthetic control arm in future clinical research.

Conclusion: STEADY leverages an artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled platform to integrate multisource data, including wound photography, social determinants of health, patient reported outcomes and caregiver information. The platform uses AI for transcription and interpretation of patient and provider dictation, supports patient-controlled EMR synchronization for comprehensive longitudinal tracking across providers, offers participant incentives to enhance engagement, and ensures rigorous, automated data quality assurance at all stages.

STEADY糖尿病足溃疡登记:方法、见解和未来方向。
背景:糖尿病足溃疡(DFUs)是糖尿病患者发病、截肢和死亡的主要原因,对缺乏医疗服务的人群影响较大。缺乏关于DFU管理和结果的全面的实际数据。摘要目的:为了描述STEADY(美国糖尿病足溃疡结构化评估和分析)注册的设计和方法,这是一项针对美国DFU患者的全国性前瞻性队列研究,其目的是评估DFU治疗模式、结果和现实环境中的卫生保健资源利用,以评估DFU治疗和治疗组合的相对有效性、成本效益和安全性。并通过风险和部位分层治疗优化模型推进疾病管理。方法:STEADY是一项为期10年的前瞻性多中心观察性研究,目的是在美国招募5000名活动性dfu患者。数据来源包括电子病例报告表格、电子医疗记录(emr)、通过移动应用程序报告的患者结果以及可选的保险索赔。主要和次要终点包括部分和完全伤口闭合的时间和发生率;伤口和疾病特征;复发率、感染率、缺血性事件和截肢率;医疗保健的利用,包括外科手术;与健康有关的生活质量;工作效率;还有其他患者报告了结果。将进行描述性、生存性和比较有效性分析。数据治理确保了完全的法规遵从性和强大的数据安全性和完整性,支持注册表数据集在未来临床研究中作为合成对照工具的潜在使用。结论:STEADY利用人工智能(AI)支持的平台整合多源数据,包括伤口摄影、健康的社会决定因素、患者报告的结果和护理人员信息。该平台使用人工智能来转录和解释患者和提供者的口述,支持患者控制的EMR同步,以便在提供者之间进行全面的纵向跟踪,为参与者提供激励以增强参与度,并确保在所有阶段严格、自动化的数据质量保证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wounds is the most widely read, peer-reviewed journal focusing on wound care and wound research. The information disseminated to our readers includes valuable research and commentaries on tissue repair and regeneration, biology and biochemistry of wound healing, and clinical management of various wound etiologies. Our multidisciplinary readership consists of dermatologists, general surgeons, plastic surgeons, vascular surgeons, internal medicine/family practitioners, podiatrists, gerontologists, researchers in industry or academia (PhDs), orthopedic surgeons, infectious disease physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. These practitioners must be well equipped to deal with a myriad of chronic wound conditions affecting their patients including vascular disease, diabetes, obesity, dermatological disorders, and more. Whether dealing with a traumatic wound, a surgical or non-skin wound, a burn injury, or a diabetic foot ulcer, wound care professionals turn to Wounds for the latest in research and practice in this ever-growing field of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书