Cutaneous safety evaluation of pure hypochlorous acid solution in preterm infants and neonates with complex wounds.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Rene Amaya, Emily Heisler
{"title":"Cutaneous safety evaluation of pure hypochlorous acid solution in preterm infants and neonates with complex wounds.","authors":"Rene Amaya, Emily Heisler","doi":"10.25270/wnds/25126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preterm infants are at heightened risk of skin injury and infection due to the immaturity of their epidermal barrier and immune defenses. Safe wound cleansing options remain limited in this population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate cutaneous safety and tolerability associated with use of a pure hypochlorous acid-preserved cleanser (pHA) in preterm and neonatal patients with complex wounds.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study evaluated the cutaneous safety of a pHA in 100 preterm and neonatal patients with complex wounds admitted to a tertiary care facility between January 2023 and July 2025. Demographic, clinical, and wound data were extracted from the electronic medical record. pHA was applied at each wound care encounter and was continued until wound closure, discharge, or transfer of care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients received a mean of 7.6 pHA applications over a mean treatment duration of 18.7 days. The youngest treated infant was born at 21 weeks' gestation. Across 766 cumulative applications, no cutaneous adverse effects or wound-related complications were observed, including contact dermatitis, erythema, chemical burns, infection, or secondary breakdown. In patients receiving pHA concurrently with other advanced wound therapies, no cutaneous adverse effects attributable to combined use were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This retrospective series represents the largest reported evaluation to date of cutaneous safety and tolerability associated with pHA use in neonatal patients. Future prospective multicenter studies are warranted to further characterize cutaneous safety of pHA use and to evaluate efficacy outcomes in neonatal wound care.</p>","PeriodicalId":23752,"journal":{"name":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","volume":"38 4","pages":"84-89"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/wnds/25126","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preterm infants are at heightened risk of skin injury and infection due to the immaturity of their epidermal barrier and immune defenses. Safe wound cleansing options remain limited in this population.

Objective: To evaluate cutaneous safety and tolerability associated with use of a pure hypochlorous acid-preserved cleanser (pHA) in preterm and neonatal patients with complex wounds.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study evaluated the cutaneous safety of a pHA in 100 preterm and neonatal patients with complex wounds admitted to a tertiary care facility between January 2023 and July 2025. Demographic, clinical, and wound data were extracted from the electronic medical record. pHA was applied at each wound care encounter and was continued until wound closure, discharge, or transfer of care.

Results: Patients received a mean of 7.6 pHA applications over a mean treatment duration of 18.7 days. The youngest treated infant was born at 21 weeks' gestation. Across 766 cumulative applications, no cutaneous adverse effects or wound-related complications were observed, including contact dermatitis, erythema, chemical burns, infection, or secondary breakdown. In patients receiving pHA concurrently with other advanced wound therapies, no cutaneous adverse effects attributable to combined use were identified.

Conclusion: This retrospective series represents the largest reported evaluation to date of cutaneous safety and tolerability associated with pHA use in neonatal patients. Future prospective multicenter studies are warranted to further characterize cutaneous safety of pHA use and to evaluate efficacy outcomes in neonatal wound care.

纯次氯酸溶液在早产儿和复杂伤口新生儿中的皮肤安全性评价。
背景:由于早产儿表皮屏障和免疫防御不成熟,其皮肤损伤和感染的风险较高。在这一人群中,安全的伤口清洗选择仍然有限。目的:评价在早产儿和新生儿复杂伤口患者中使用纯次氯酸保存洗面乳(pHA)的皮肤安全性和耐受性。材料和方法:本回顾性研究评估了2023年1月至2025年7月间在三级医疗机构收治的100例复杂伤口的早产儿和新生儿患者使用pHA的皮肤安全性。从电子病历中提取人口统计、临床和伤口数据。pHA应用于每次伤口护理,并持续到伤口愈合、出院或转移护理。结果:患者平均接受7.6次pHA应用,平均治疗时间为18.7天。接受治疗的最小的婴儿在怀孕21周时出生。在766次累计应用中,未观察到皮肤不良反应或伤口相关并发症,包括接触性皮炎、红斑、化学烧伤、感染或继发性破裂。在同时接受pHA和其他高级伤口治疗的患者中,没有发现可归因于联合使用的皮肤不良反应。结论:该回顾性系列研究是迄今为止报道的新生儿pHA使用相关皮肤安全性和耐受性的最大评估。未来的前瞻性多中心研究有必要进一步表征pHA使用的皮肤安全性,并评估新生儿伤口护理的疗效结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wounds is the most widely read, peer-reviewed journal focusing on wound care and wound research. The information disseminated to our readers includes valuable research and commentaries on tissue repair and regeneration, biology and biochemistry of wound healing, and clinical management of various wound etiologies. Our multidisciplinary readership consists of dermatologists, general surgeons, plastic surgeons, vascular surgeons, internal medicine/family practitioners, podiatrists, gerontologists, researchers in industry or academia (PhDs), orthopedic surgeons, infectious disease physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. These practitioners must be well equipped to deal with a myriad of chronic wound conditions affecting their patients including vascular disease, diabetes, obesity, dermatological disorders, and more. Whether dealing with a traumatic wound, a surgical or non-skin wound, a burn injury, or a diabetic foot ulcer, wound care professionals turn to Wounds for the latest in research and practice in this ever-growing field of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书