{"title":"Inference and Imagination.","authors":"Ruth M J Byrne","doi":"10.1111/tops.70066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our ability to imagine alternatives to reality is central to everyday cognition. Our competence in reasoning depends not only on our capacity to envisage the relevant facts, but also on our proficiency in simulating alternatives to them. I discuss how our skill in making deductive inferences depends on imagining possibilities. To illustrate, I consider evidence on the suppression of inferences, the cognitive processes based on mental models that explain how we make inferences, and corroboration from studies of counterfactual reasoning. I also discuss how our ability to create alternatives to reality depends on identifying mutable aspects of mental simulations. To illustrate, I consider evidence on imagining alternatives to aspects of situations within our control, the cognitive processes based on simulation availability that explain how we create alternatives to reality, and corroboration from studies of moral decision-making. I conclude with an exploration of the imagination as the engine of the mind.</p>","PeriodicalId":47822,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Cognitive Science","volume":" ","pages":"e70066"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13397060/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Cognitive Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.70066","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Our ability to imagine alternatives to reality is central to everyday cognition. Our competence in reasoning depends not only on our capacity to envisage the relevant facts, but also on our proficiency in simulating alternatives to them. I discuss how our skill in making deductive inferences depends on imagining possibilities. To illustrate, I consider evidence on the suppression of inferences, the cognitive processes based on mental models that explain how we make inferences, and corroboration from studies of counterfactual reasoning. I also discuss how our ability to create alternatives to reality depends on identifying mutable aspects of mental simulations. To illustrate, I consider evidence on imagining alternatives to aspects of situations within our control, the cognitive processes based on simulation availability that explain how we create alternatives to reality, and corroboration from studies of moral decision-making. I conclude with an exploration of the imagination as the engine of the mind.
期刊介绍:
Topics in Cognitive Science (topiCS) is an innovative new journal that covers all areas of cognitive science including cognitive modeling, cognitive neuroscience, cognitive anthropology, and cognitive science and philosophy. topiCS aims to provide a forum for: -New communities of researchers- New controversies in established areas- Debates and commentaries- Reflections and integration The publication features multiple scholarly papers dedicated to a single topic. Some of these topics will appear together in one issue, but others may appear across several issues or develop into a regular feature. Controversies or debates started in one issue may be followed up by commentaries in a later issue, etc. However, the format and origin of the topics will vary greatly.