Treatment of Nausea and Vomiting With Zingiber officinale in Pregnancy: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews With Meta-Synthesis.

IF 8.1 2区 医学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Phytotherapy Research Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-19 DOI:10.1002/ptr.70405
Zoya Tahergorabi, Mahdi Eslami, Morteza Arab-Zozani
{"title":"Treatment of Nausea and Vomiting With Zingiber officinale in Pregnancy: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews With Meta-Synthesis.","authors":"Zoya Tahergorabi, Mahdi Eslami, Morteza Arab-Zozani","doi":"10.1002/ptr.70405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Affecting approximately 85% of expectant mothers during the first trimester, nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP) are frequently reported symptoms. Despite numerous existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMs), findings remain inconsistent. Consequently, this study assesses the quality of these prior SRMs and investigates the efficacy of ginger as a treatment for NVP. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science from their inception through December 30, 2024. This review includes peer-reviewed English-language SRMs investigating ginger as a therapeutic intervention for pregnancy-related nausea and vomiting. Methodological rigor was evaluated using the AMSTAR-2 checklist, while evidence quality was assessed via the GRADE approach. Findings are synthesized narratively through content analysis. The study protocol was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO database. This study analyzed 18 systematic reviews, of which eight (44%) incorporated meta-analyses. The Rhodes Index of Nausea and Vomiting (RINV) emerged as the primary tool for evaluating outcomes. Regarding study reporting and transparency, seven studies registered their protocols in PROSPERO, while eight adhered to the PRISMA checklist. Overall, the included reviews demonstrated low methodological quality, with a mean score of 11.77. Specifically, 28% (n = 5) were rated as high quality, 28% (n = 5) as moderate, 22% (n = 4) as low, and 22% (n = 4) as critically low. Taking ginger supplements (usually between 450 and 1950 mg daily) significantly decreases the severity and occurrence of nausea and vomiting compared to a placebo. This benefit is more noticeable for nausea than for vomiting, where the results are less consistent. Numerous studies have shown that ginger does not raise the risk of adverse effects, such as spontaneous abortion or side effects like heartburn and drowsiness, when compared to a placebo or vitamin B6. Current evidence clearly shows that ginger is a safe and effective treatment for nausea and vomiting during pregnancy, with effectiveness similar to vitamin B6 and some traditional medications, and it has a good safety profile. Ginger can be recommended as a dependable medicinal herb for women dealing with NVP, though more research is needed to determine the best doses and confirm long-term safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":20110,"journal":{"name":"Phytotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"5538-5550"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13549022/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phytotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.70405","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Affecting approximately 85% of expectant mothers during the first trimester, nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP) are frequently reported symptoms. Despite numerous existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMs), findings remain inconsistent. Consequently, this study assesses the quality of these prior SRMs and investigates the efficacy of ginger as a treatment for NVP. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science from their inception through December 30, 2024. This review includes peer-reviewed English-language SRMs investigating ginger as a therapeutic intervention for pregnancy-related nausea and vomiting. Methodological rigor was evaluated using the AMSTAR-2 checklist, while evidence quality was assessed via the GRADE approach. Findings are synthesized narratively through content analysis. The study protocol was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO database. This study analyzed 18 systematic reviews, of which eight (44%) incorporated meta-analyses. The Rhodes Index of Nausea and Vomiting (RINV) emerged as the primary tool for evaluating outcomes. Regarding study reporting and transparency, seven studies registered their protocols in PROSPERO, while eight adhered to the PRISMA checklist. Overall, the included reviews demonstrated low methodological quality, with a mean score of 11.77. Specifically, 28% (n = 5) were rated as high quality, 28% (n = 5) as moderate, 22% (n = 4) as low, and 22% (n = 4) as critically low. Taking ginger supplements (usually between 450 and 1950 mg daily) significantly decreases the severity and occurrence of nausea and vomiting compared to a placebo. This benefit is more noticeable for nausea than for vomiting, where the results are less consistent. Numerous studies have shown that ginger does not raise the risk of adverse effects, such as spontaneous abortion or side effects like heartburn and drowsiness, when compared to a placebo or vitamin B6. Current evidence clearly shows that ginger is a safe and effective treatment for nausea and vomiting during pregnancy, with effectiveness similar to vitamin B6 and some traditional medications, and it has a good safety profile. Ginger can be recommended as a dependable medicinal herb for women dealing with NVP, though more research is needed to determine the best doses and confirm long-term safety.

生姜治疗妊娠期恶心呕吐:综合系统评价综述。
妊娠早期恶心和呕吐(NVP)是常见的妊娠症状,约85%的孕妇在妊娠早期受到影响。尽管已有大量的系统综述和荟萃分析(SRMs),研究结果仍然不一致。因此,本研究评估了这些先前srm的质量,并研究了生姜作为NVP治疗的功效。我们对PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane和Web of Science从成立到2024年12月30日进行了全面的搜索。本综述包括同行评议的英语SRMs研究生姜作为妊娠相关恶心和呕吐的治疗干预。使用AMSTAR-2检查表评估方法严谨性,而通过GRADE方法评估证据质量。通过内容分析,对研究结果进行综合叙述。研究方案被前瞻性地登记在PROSPERO数据库中。本研究分析了18项系统综述,其中8项(44%)纳入了荟萃分析。罗德恶心和呕吐指数(RINV)成为评估结果的主要工具。关于研究报告和透明度,7项研究在PROSPERO登记了他们的方案,而8项研究遵守了PRISMA清单。总体而言,纳入的综述显示出较低的方法学质量,平均得分为11.77。具体来说,28% (n = 5)被评为高质量,28% (n = 5)被评为中等,22% (n = 4)被评为低质量,22% (n = 4)被评为极低质量。与安慰剂相比,服用生姜补充剂(通常在每天450到1950毫克之间)可以显著降低恶心和呕吐的严重程度和发生率。这种效果对恶心比呕吐更明显,呕吐的效果不太一致。大量研究表明,与安慰剂或维生素B6相比,生姜不会增加不良反应的风险,如自然流产或胃灼热和嗜睡等副作用。目前的证据清楚地表明,生姜是一种安全有效的治疗怀孕期间恶心和呕吐的方法,其效果与维生素B6和一些传统药物相似,而且它具有良好的安全性。生姜可以作为一种可靠的草药推荐给患有NVP的女性,尽管需要更多的研究来确定最佳剂量并确认长期安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Phytotherapy Research
Phytotherapy Research 医学-药学
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
325
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Phytotherapy Research is an internationally recognized pharmacological journal that serves as a trailblazing resource for biochemists, pharmacologists, and toxicologists. We strive to disseminate groundbreaking research on medicinal plants, pushing the boundaries of knowledge and understanding in this field. Our primary focus areas encompass pharmacology, toxicology, and the clinical applications of herbs and natural products in medicine. We actively encourage submissions on the effects of commonly consumed food ingredients and standardized plant extracts. We welcome a range of contributions including original research papers, review articles, and letters. By providing a platform for the latest developments and discoveries in phytotherapy, we aim to support the advancement of scientific knowledge and contribute to the improvement of modern medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书