Population-based changes in oral health-related quality of life in Australia.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Xiangqun Ju, Liana Luzzi, Lisa M Jamieson
{"title":"Population-based changes in oral health-related quality of life in Australia.","authors":"Xiangqun Ju, Liana Luzzi, Lisa M Jamieson","doi":"10.1186/s12955-026-02570-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Good oral health is crucial for overall well-being; yet many people experience pain, discomfort, or social difficulties due to oral problems. Understanding how Australians' oral health and quality of life have changed over time helps identify whether national dental policies and access to care have improved. The study aimed to assess temporal changes in oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and identify associated risk indicators using the short Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) instrument among Australian adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were sourced from the two most recent nationally representative surveys in Australia: National Survey of Adult Oral Health, NSAOH-1 (2004-06) and NSAOH-2 (2017-18). Both are population-based cross-sectional studies conducted in Australia, targeting adults aged 15 years and older. The outcome of interest was oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), measured using the validated short-form Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14). Survey-weighted negative binomial regression models were employed to estimate both unadjusted and adjusted mean ratios (MRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for OHIP-14 scores. Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition analysis was used to assess the contribution of changes in measured population characteristics to differences in mean OHIP-14 scores between two surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 4,170 participants completed the OHIP-14 questionnaire in 2004-06, and 2,836 did so in 2017-18. Between the two survey waves, the mean OHIP-14 score decreased from 7.3 to 5.5. After adjusting for all covariates, participants in NSAOH-1 had a 61% higher mean OHIP-14 score compared to those in NSAOH-2 (MR = 1.61; 95% CI: 1.53-1.70). Higher OHIP-14 scores were found among older adults, lower-educated, lower-income individuals, those with poorer health, smokers, frequent toothache sufferers, and people whose last dental visit was for a problem. The decomposition analysis showed that 41% of the difference in mean OHIP-14 scores was explained by measured population characteristics, Household income, and usual reason for dental visiting made the largest contributions to the explained component (80%), followed by smoking status (15%) and education level (9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OHRQoL among Australian adults improved over 14 years, reflected by lower mean OHIP-14 scores in NSAOH-2 than NSAOH-1. However, poorer OHRQoL remained associated with older age, female sex, socioeconomic disadvantage, poorer self-rated health and oral health, smoking, toothache, and problem-oriented dental visiting. Decomposition analysis suggested that changes in income and dental visiting patterns partly explained this improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":12980,"journal":{"name":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13548665/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-026-02570-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Good oral health is crucial for overall well-being; yet many people experience pain, discomfort, or social difficulties due to oral problems. Understanding how Australians' oral health and quality of life have changed over time helps identify whether national dental policies and access to care have improved. The study aimed to assess temporal changes in oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and identify associated risk indicators using the short Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) instrument among Australian adults.

Methods: Data were sourced from the two most recent nationally representative surveys in Australia: National Survey of Adult Oral Health, NSAOH-1 (2004-06) and NSAOH-2 (2017-18). Both are population-based cross-sectional studies conducted in Australia, targeting adults aged 15 years and older. The outcome of interest was oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), measured using the validated short-form Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14). Survey-weighted negative binomial regression models were employed to estimate both unadjusted and adjusted mean ratios (MRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for OHIP-14 scores. Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition analysis was used to assess the contribution of changes in measured population characteristics to differences in mean OHIP-14 scores between two surveys.

Results: In total, 4,170 participants completed the OHIP-14 questionnaire in 2004-06, and 2,836 did so in 2017-18. Between the two survey waves, the mean OHIP-14 score decreased from 7.3 to 5.5. After adjusting for all covariates, participants in NSAOH-1 had a 61% higher mean OHIP-14 score compared to those in NSAOH-2 (MR = 1.61; 95% CI: 1.53-1.70). Higher OHIP-14 scores were found among older adults, lower-educated, lower-income individuals, those with poorer health, smokers, frequent toothache sufferers, and people whose last dental visit was for a problem. The decomposition analysis showed that 41% of the difference in mean OHIP-14 scores was explained by measured population characteristics, Household income, and usual reason for dental visiting made the largest contributions to the explained component (80%), followed by smoking status (15%) and education level (9%).

Conclusion: OHRQoL among Australian adults improved over 14 years, reflected by lower mean OHIP-14 scores in NSAOH-2 than NSAOH-1. However, poorer OHRQoL remained associated with older age, female sex, socioeconomic disadvantage, poorer self-rated health and oral health, smoking, toothache, and problem-oriented dental visiting. Decomposition analysis suggested that changes in income and dental visiting patterns partly explained this improvement.

澳大利亚口腔健康相关生活质量人群变化
背景:良好的口腔健康对整体健康至关重要;然而,许多人由于口腔问题而经历疼痛、不适或社交困难。了解澳大利亚人的口腔健康和生活质量是如何随着时间的推移而变化的,有助于确定国家牙科政策和获得护理的机会是否有所改善。该研究旨在评估澳大利亚成年人口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)的时间变化,并使用简短的口腔健康影响概况(OHIP-14)工具确定相关的风险指标。方法:数据来自澳大利亚最近两次具有全国代表性的调查:全国成人口腔健康调查,NSAOH-1(2004-06)和NSAOH-2(2017-18)。这两项研究都是在澳大利亚进行的以人群为基础的横断面研究,目标是15岁及以上的成年人。研究的结果是口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL),使用经过验证的简短口腔健康影响概况(OHIP-14)进行测量。采用调查加权负二项回归模型估计OHIP-14评分的未调整和调整平均比率(MRs)及其95%置信区间(ci)。使用Blinder-Oaxaca分解分析来评估测量人群特征的变化对两次调查之间平均OHIP-14评分差异的贡献。结果:2004-06年度共有4170名参与者完成了OHIP-14问卷,2017-18年度共有2836名参与者完成了OHIP-14问卷。在两次调查期间,OHIP-14的平均得分从7.3下降到5.5。在对所有协变量进行调整后,NSAOH-1的参与者比NSAOH-2的参与者的平均OHIP-14评分高61% (MR = 1.61; 95% CI: 1.53-1.70)。OHIP-14得分较高的人群包括老年人、受教育程度较低、收入较低、健康状况较差的人、吸烟者、经常牙痛患者以及最近一次去看牙医是为了解决问题的人。分解分析表明,OHIP-14平均分差异的41%可以用测量的人口特征来解释,家庭收入和经常去看牙医的原因对解释成分的贡献最大(80%),其次是吸烟状况(15%)和教育水平(9%)。结论:澳大利亚成年人的OHRQoL在14年内有所改善,反映在NSAOH-2的平均OHIP-14评分低于NSAOH-1。然而,较差的OHRQoL仍然与年龄较大、女性、社会经济劣势、较差的自评健康和口腔健康、吸烟、牙痛和以问题为导向的牙科就诊有关。分解分析表明,收入和看牙医模式的变化部分解释了这一改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
154
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes considers original manuscripts on the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) assessment for evaluation of medical and psychosocial interventions. It also considers approaches and studies on psychometric properties of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures, including cultural validation of instruments if they provide information about the impact of interventions. The journal publishes study protocols and reviews summarising the present state of knowledge concerning a particular aspect of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures. Reviews should generally follow systematic review methodology. Comments on articles and letters to the editor are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书