Davide Tosches, Carla Caldeira, Francesca Demichelis, Debora Fino, Serenella Sala
{"title":"The role of Life Cycle Assessment in Safe and Sustainable by Design: Lessons learned from a case study on plasticizers.","authors":"Davide Tosches, Carla Caldeira, Francesca Demichelis, Debora Fino, Serenella Sala","doi":"10.1093/inteam/vjag059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) is a concept introduced in the Chemical Strategy for Sustainability of the European Commission, with the ambition of guiding innovation in chemicals and materials design toward the minimization of impacts on human health and the environment. To operationalize this concept, the European Commission Joint Research Centre developed a scientific framework, which integrates safety and environmental sustainability considerations. Such a framework was then adopted by the European Commission as a recommendation, for the use of companies and research institutes working on the development of chemicals and materials. The framework brings together two different aspects: safety and environmental sustainability. Safety is addressed looking at intrinsic properties of the chemicals and assessing risks related to exposure scenarios for workers, consumers, and environment, while the environmental sustainability aspect is assessed via the application of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) following the provisions of the Product Environmental Footprint method. The goal of this study is to test via a case study the use of LCA to assess six plasticizers, assessing the framework's applicability and proposing approaches to address challenges and research needs. Indeed, while literature on LCA of chemicals is expanding, there are still a number of open issues to be addressed. Seven pivotal challenges are presented and discussed in this study. They cover all the phases of the life cycle, from the goal and scope (benchmark definition and application to intermediate products) to Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) (availability of data, modeling of end of life, additional information and innovation perspective) and Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) (e.g., comprehensively addressing impacts related to substances of concern). The case study examined and the seven identified challenges are starting points for improving the implementation of the Safe and Sustainable by Design framework, promoting sustainable innovation in the manufacturing of chemicals and materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":" ","pages":"1623-1634"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjag059","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) is a concept introduced in the Chemical Strategy for Sustainability of the European Commission, with the ambition of guiding innovation in chemicals and materials design toward the minimization of impacts on human health and the environment. To operationalize this concept, the European Commission Joint Research Centre developed a scientific framework, which integrates safety and environmental sustainability considerations. Such a framework was then adopted by the European Commission as a recommendation, for the use of companies and research institutes working on the development of chemicals and materials. The framework brings together two different aspects: safety and environmental sustainability. Safety is addressed looking at intrinsic properties of the chemicals and assessing risks related to exposure scenarios for workers, consumers, and environment, while the environmental sustainability aspect is assessed via the application of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) following the provisions of the Product Environmental Footprint method. The goal of this study is to test via a case study the use of LCA to assess six plasticizers, assessing the framework's applicability and proposing approaches to address challenges and research needs. Indeed, while literature on LCA of chemicals is expanding, there are still a number of open issues to be addressed. Seven pivotal challenges are presented and discussed in this study. They cover all the phases of the life cycle, from the goal and scope (benchmark definition and application to intermediate products) to Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) (availability of data, modeling of end of life, additional information and innovation perspective) and Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) (e.g., comprehensively addressing impacts related to substances of concern). The case study examined and the seven identified challenges are starting points for improving the implementation of the Safe and Sustainable by Design framework, promoting sustainable innovation in the manufacturing of chemicals and materials.
期刊介绍:
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM) publishes the science underpinning environmental decision making and problem solving. Papers submitted to IEAM must link science and technical innovations to vexing regional or global environmental issues in one or more of the following core areas:
Science-informed regulation, policy, and decision making
Health and ecological risk and impact assessment
Restoration and management of damaged ecosystems
Sustaining ecosystems
Managing large-scale environmental change
Papers published in these broad fields of study are connected by an array of interdisciplinary engineering, management, and scientific themes, which collectively reflect the interconnectedness of the scientific, social, and environmental challenges facing our modern global society:
Methods for environmental quality assessment; forecasting across a number of ecosystem uses and challenges (systems-based, cost-benefit, ecosystem services, etc.); measuring or predicting ecosystem change and adaptation
Approaches that connect policy and management tools; harmonize national and international environmental regulation; merge human well-being with ecological management; develop and sustain the function of ecosystems; conceptualize, model and apply concepts of spatial and regional sustainability
Assessment and management frameworks that incorporate conservation, life cycle, restoration, and sustainability; considerations for climate-induced adaptation, change and consequences, and vulnerability
Environmental management applications using risk-based approaches; considerations for protecting and fostering biodiversity, as well as enhancement or protection of ecosystem services and resiliency.