Examining clinical relevance of interpretation inflexibility in social contexts.

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Wisteria Deng, Reut Zabag, Saumya Narain, Tyrone D Cannon, Jutta Joormann
{"title":"Examining clinical relevance of interpretation inflexibility in social contexts.","authors":"Wisteria Deng, Reut Zabag, Saumya Narain, Tyrone D Cannon, Jutta Joormann","doi":"10.1186/s12991-026-00683-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Growing research highlights interpretation inflexibility as a key transdiagnostic mechanism across psychopathologies. Yet, few studies have examined its role in everyday socio-emotional processing. This review bridges that gap by exploring how interpretation inflexibility contributes to psychopathology-particularly depression and psychosis-in social contexts. Evidence suggests disrupted interpersonal processes, including rigid interpretations of social scenarios and impressions of others, are central to understanding depressive and psychotic symptoms. Depression is marked by valence-specific, context-dependent inflexibility, with difficulty disengaging from negative biases. In contrast, psychosis shows a broader inflexibility across emotional valences. The review also outlines evolving measures of interpretation inflexibility, emphasizing the need to account for social context in interpretation revision. Current findings highlight the value of examining inflexibility within social frameworks to better understand its role in adaptive functioning and psychopathology. Future research on interpretation inflexibility in social contexts could inform novel interventions and improve clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7942,"journal":{"name":"Annals of General Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13531911/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of General Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12991-026-00683-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Growing research highlights interpretation inflexibility as a key transdiagnostic mechanism across psychopathologies. Yet, few studies have examined its role in everyday socio-emotional processing. This review bridges that gap by exploring how interpretation inflexibility contributes to psychopathology-particularly depression and psychosis-in social contexts. Evidence suggests disrupted interpersonal processes, including rigid interpretations of social scenarios and impressions of others, are central to understanding depressive and psychotic symptoms. Depression is marked by valence-specific, context-dependent inflexibility, with difficulty disengaging from negative biases. In contrast, psychosis shows a broader inflexibility across emotional valences. The review also outlines evolving measures of interpretation inflexibility, emphasizing the need to account for social context in interpretation revision. Current findings highlight the value of examining inflexibility within social frameworks to better understand its role in adaptive functioning and psychopathology. Future research on interpretation inflexibility in social contexts could inform novel interventions and improve clinical outcomes.

在社会背景下检查解释缺乏灵活性的临床相关性。
越来越多的研究强调解释缺乏灵活性是跨精神病理学的关键跨诊断机制。然而,很少有研究考察它在日常社会情绪处理中的作用。这篇综述通过探索在社会背景下,解释不灵活性如何导致精神病理——特别是抑郁症和精神病——来弥合这一差距。有证据表明,人际交往过程的中断,包括对社会情景和他人印象的严格解释,是理解抑郁和精神病症状的核心。抑郁症的特点是价格特异性、情境依赖性的僵化,难以摆脱负面偏见。相比之下,精神病表现出更广泛的情感不灵活性。该审查还概述了口译缺乏灵活性的演变措施,强调在口译修订中需要考虑社会背景。目前的研究结果强调了在社会框架内检查不灵活性的价值,以更好地理解其在适应功能和精神病理学中的作用。未来对社会背景下解释缺乏灵活性的研究可以为新的干预措施和改善临床结果提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.70%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of General Psychiatry considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychiatry, including neuroscience and psychological medicine. Both basic and clinical neuroscience contributions are encouraged. Annals of General Psychiatry emphasizes a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health and strongly supports and follows the principles of evidence-based medicine. As an open access journal, Annals of General Psychiatry facilitates the worldwide distribution of high quality psychiatry and mental health research. The journal considers submissions on a wide range of topics including, but not limited to, psychopharmacology, forensic psychiatry, psychotic disorders, psychiatric genetics, and mood and anxiety disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书