Creatine Supplementation in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Luciana de Moura Leite, Heloísa Carneiro Brito, Rafael Lara Nohmi, Fabrícia Cardoso Marques, Pedro Paulo Dal Bello, Daniel V. Araújo
{"title":"Creatine Supplementation in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Luciana de Moura Leite,&nbsp;Heloísa Carneiro Brito,&nbsp;Rafael Lara Nohmi,&nbsp;Fabrícia Cardoso Marques,&nbsp;Pedro Paulo Dal Bello,&nbsp;Daniel V. Araújo","doi":"10.1002/rco2.70044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Creatine supplementation (CrSUPP) has demonstrated benefits in improving body composition, muscle strength and physical function in healthy older adults. However, preclinical studies have raised concerns about the potential for CrSUPP to negatively impact cancer outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CrSUPP in patients with cancer.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CrSUPP to placebo (PBO) in cancer patients. Outcomes included changes in body composition (lean mass [LM] and fat mass [FM]), muscle strength, physical function, quality of life (QoL), safety and survival. Standardized mean differences (SMD) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed using the <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> statistic (significance: <i>p</i> &lt; 0.1, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> &gt; 25%). Random-effects models were applied. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42025634948).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Five RCTs including 373 patients (190 CrSUPP, 183 PBO) were analysed. Three studies included patients with non-metastatic disease, whereas two included predominantly advanced cancer cases. Most patients were receiving active oncologic treatment. CrSUPP regimens varied, with three trials using a loading dose (20 g/day for 5–7 days), followed by maintenance (2–5 g/day), and two trials using either a loading or maintenance dosing strategy. Intervention duration ranged from 1 to 12 weeks, combined with resistance training in two studies. There were no significant differences between CrSUPP and PBO for LM (MD 0.55 kg [95% CI, −3.96, 5.07], <i>p</i> = 0.81, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%) or muscle strength (SMD −0.05 [95% CI, −0.29, 0.18], <i>p</i> = 0.65, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%). FM was significantly reduced in the CrSUPP group (MD −2.81 kg [95% CI, −4.21, −1.41], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.9%). Physical function showed no significant changes (SMD −0.20 [95% CI, −0.68, 0.28], <i>p</i> = 0.41, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%). QoL was assessed in three studies, with data available from two, showing no CrSUPP effect. Safety data from three studies revealed no differences in adverse events between groups; renal function was assessed in one trial and showed non-clinically relevant creatinine elevations. Overall survival was reported in one trial, showing no impact of CrSUPP.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>CrSUPP did not significantly affect muscle strength, physical function or lean mass in cancer patients and may be associated with a reduction in fat mass; however, this finding should be interpreted with caution given the limited number of studies, heterogeneity of patient populations, interventions and outcome measures.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73544,"journal":{"name":"JCSM rapid communications","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/rco2.70044","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCSM rapid communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rco2.70044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Creatine supplementation (CrSUPP) has demonstrated benefits in improving body composition, muscle strength and physical function in healthy older adults. However, preclinical studies have raised concerns about the potential for CrSUPP to negatively impact cancer outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CrSUPP in patients with cancer.

Methods

PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CrSUPP to placebo (PBO) in cancer patients. Outcomes included changes in body composition (lean mass [LM] and fat mass [FM]), muscle strength, physical function, quality of life (QoL), safety and survival. Standardized mean differences (SMD) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic (significance: p < 0.1, I2 > 25%). Random-effects models were applied. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42025634948).

Results

Five RCTs including 373 patients (190 CrSUPP, 183 PBO) were analysed. Three studies included patients with non-metastatic disease, whereas two included predominantly advanced cancer cases. Most patients were receiving active oncologic treatment. CrSUPP regimens varied, with three trials using a loading dose (20 g/day for 5–7 days), followed by maintenance (2–5 g/day), and two trials using either a loading or maintenance dosing strategy. Intervention duration ranged from 1 to 12 weeks, combined with resistance training in two studies. There were no significant differences between CrSUPP and PBO for LM (MD 0.55 kg [95% CI, −3.96, 5.07], p = 0.81, I2 = 0%) or muscle strength (SMD −0.05 [95% CI, −0.29, 0.18], p = 0.65, I2 = 0%). FM was significantly reduced in the CrSUPP group (MD −2.81 kg [95% CI, −4.21, −1.41], p < 0.001, I2 = 0.9%). Physical function showed no significant changes (SMD −0.20 [95% CI, −0.68, 0.28], p = 0.41, I2 = 0%). QoL was assessed in three studies, with data available from two, showing no CrSUPP effect. Safety data from three studies revealed no differences in adverse events between groups; renal function was assessed in one trial and showed non-clinically relevant creatinine elevations. Overall survival was reported in one trial, showing no impact of CrSUPP.

Conclusions

CrSUPP did not significantly affect muscle strength, physical function or lean mass in cancer patients and may be associated with a reduction in fat mass; however, this finding should be interpreted with caution given the limited number of studies, heterogeneity of patient populations, interventions and outcome measures.

Abstract Image

癌症患者补充肌酸:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
背景补充肌酸(CrSUPP)已被证明对改善健康老年人的身体成分、肌肉力量和身体功能有好处。然而,临床前研究引起了人们对CrSUPP可能对癌症预后产生负面影响的担忧。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估CrSUPP在癌症患者中的疗效和安全性。方法系统检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库,比较CrSUPP与安慰剂(PBO)治疗癌症患者的随机对照试验。结果包括身体组成(瘦质量[LM]和脂肪质量[FM])、肌肉力量、身体功能、生活质量(QoL)、安全性和生存率的变化。计算具有95%置信区间(CI)的标准化平均差(SMD)或平均差(MD)。采用I2统计量评估异质性(显著性:p <; 0.1, I2 > 25%)。采用随机效应模型。该协议已在PROSPERO (CRD42025634948)中注册。结果共纳入5项随机对照试验373例,其中CrSUPP 190例,PBO 183例。三项研究包括非转移性疾病患者,而两项研究主要包括晚期癌症病例。大多数患者正在接受积极的肿瘤治疗。CrSUPP方案各不相同,有三个试验使用负荷剂量(20 g/天,持续5-7天),然后是维持剂量(2-5 g/天),还有两个试验使用负荷或维持剂量策略。在两项研究中,干预持续时间为1至12周,并结合阻力训练。CrSUPP和PBO在LM (MD为0.55 kg [95% CI, - 3.96, 5.07], p = 0.81, I2 = 0%)或肌力(SMD为- 0.05 [95% CI, - 0.29, 0.18], p = 0.65, I2 = 0%)方面无显著差异。CrSUPP组FM显著降低(MD为- 2.81 kg [95% CI, - 4.21, - 1.41], p < 0.001, I2 = 0.9%)。身体功能无明显变化(SMD = 0.20 [95% CI, - 0.68, 0.28], p = 0.41, I2 = 0%)。在三项研究中评估了生活质量,其中两项研究的数据显示没有CrSUPP效应。三项研究的安全性数据显示,两组之间的不良事件没有差异;在一项试验中评估肾功能,显示非临床相关的肌酐升高。一项试验报告了总生存率,显示CrSUPP没有影响。结论:CrSUPP对癌症患者的肌肉力量、身体功能或瘦质量没有显著影响,可能与脂肪量的减少有关;然而,考虑到研究数量有限、患者群体、干预措施和结果测量的异质性,这一发现应谨慎解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书