Long-Term Cultivation of Perennial Energy Crops Enhance Ecosystem Multifunctionality on Marginal Red Soil Without Trade-Offs

IF 4.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 AGRONOMY
Yini Wu (伍旖旎), Yi Xu (许依), Tongcheng Fu (傅童成), Meng Li (李蒙), Moritz von Cossel, Grant Campbell, Pete Smith, Yasir Iqbal, Zili Yi (易自力), Shuai Xue (薛帅)
{"title":"Long-Term Cultivation of Perennial Energy Crops Enhance Ecosystem Multifunctionality on Marginal Red Soil Without Trade-Offs","authors":"Yini Wu (伍旖旎),&nbsp;Yi Xu (许依),&nbsp;Tongcheng Fu (傅童成),&nbsp;Meng Li (李蒙),&nbsp;Moritz von Cossel,&nbsp;Grant Campbell,&nbsp;Pete Smith,&nbsp;Yasir Iqbal,&nbsp;Zili Yi (易自力),&nbsp;Shuai Xue (薛帅)","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Perennial energy crops (PECs) are increasingly being recommended for cultivation on marginal lands to support the bioeconomy and promote soil restoration, owing to their low input requirements and large potential for soil organic carbon sequestration. However, the effects of the cultivation of PECs on the trade-offs or synergies among soil functions, and consequently on ecosystem multifunctionality (EMF), remain unclear, hindering large-scale adoption. We conducted our measurements in a long-term field experiment that was established a decade ago, where <i>Miscanthus</i> and switchgrass were cultivated alongside a native C<sub>3</sub> grass mixture (<i>Cyperus rotundus</i> L. and <i>Setaria viridis</i> L.) as reference to assess the effects of PECs on soil multifunctionality. We assessed 10 ecosystem functions grouped into provisioning, supporting, and regulating services. The results demonstrate that <i>Miscanthus</i> and switchgrass cultivation elevated the overall EMF by an average of 5.29-fold over the C<sub>3</sub> native grass control, with supporting, regulating, and provisioning services increasing by 2.08, 7.27, and 43.98-fold, respectively. Specifically, the two PECs improved all 10 measured soil functions, with the exception of abiotic stress regulation under switchgrass cultivation. <i>Miscanthus</i> outperformed switchgrass by 41.54% in supporting services and 81.09% in provisioning services, resulting in higher EMF. Moreover, strong positive relationships were observed among the three service categories, indicating that the cultivation of PECs improves EMF consistently without significant trade-offs. These findings suggest that cultivating PECs on marginal land can simultaneously provide sustainable biomass feedstock and enhance soil health, supporting the feasibility for larger-scale deployment.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"18 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70154","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perennial energy crops (PECs) are increasingly being recommended for cultivation on marginal lands to support the bioeconomy and promote soil restoration, owing to their low input requirements and large potential for soil organic carbon sequestration. However, the effects of the cultivation of PECs on the trade-offs or synergies among soil functions, and consequently on ecosystem multifunctionality (EMF), remain unclear, hindering large-scale adoption. We conducted our measurements in a long-term field experiment that was established a decade ago, where Miscanthus and switchgrass were cultivated alongside a native C3 grass mixture (Cyperus rotundus L. and Setaria viridis L.) as reference to assess the effects of PECs on soil multifunctionality. We assessed 10 ecosystem functions grouped into provisioning, supporting, and regulating services. The results demonstrate that Miscanthus and switchgrass cultivation elevated the overall EMF by an average of 5.29-fold over the C3 native grass control, with supporting, regulating, and provisioning services increasing by 2.08, 7.27, and 43.98-fold, respectively. Specifically, the two PECs improved all 10 measured soil functions, with the exception of abiotic stress regulation under switchgrass cultivation. Miscanthus outperformed switchgrass by 41.54% in supporting services and 81.09% in provisioning services, resulting in higher EMF. Moreover, strong positive relationships were observed among the three service categories, indicating that the cultivation of PECs improves EMF consistently without significant trade-offs. These findings suggest that cultivating PECs on marginal land can simultaneously provide sustainable biomass feedstock and enhance soil health, supporting the feasibility for larger-scale deployment.

Abstract Image

长期种植多年生能源作物增强边缘红壤生态系统多功能性
由于多年生能源作物投入需求低,土壤有机碳封存潜力大,因此越来越多地被推荐用于边际土地种植,以支持生物经济和促进土壤恢复。然而,PECs的种植对土壤功能之间的权衡或协同作用的影响,以及对生态系统多功能性(EMF)的影响仍不清楚,阻碍了大规模采用。我们在十年前建立的一个长期田间试验中进行了测量,在那里,芒草和柳枝稷与本地C3草混合物(Cyperus rotundus L.和Setaria viridis L.)一起种植,作为参考,评估PECs对土壤多功能的影响。我们评估了10个生态系统功能,分为供应、支持和调节服务。结果表明,种植芒草和柳枝稷平均提高了C3原生草的总EMF值5.29倍,其中支持、调节和供给服务分别提高了2.08倍、7.27倍和43.98倍。具体而言,除了柳枝稷栽培下的非生物胁迫调节外,两种PECs改善了所有10项土壤功能。芒草在配套服务和供给服务上的表现分别比柳枝稷高41.54%和81.09%,从而产生更高的EMF。此外,在三种服务类别之间观察到强烈的正相关关系,表明pec的培养可以持续改善EMF,而无需进行重大权衡。这些结果表明,在边缘土地上种植PECs可以同时提供可持续的生物质原料和改善土壤健康,支持大规模部署的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Change Biology Bioenergy
Global Change Biology Bioenergy AGRONOMY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used. Key areas covered by the journal: Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis). Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues. Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems. Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy. Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书