Yini Wu (伍旖旎), Yi Xu (许依), Tongcheng Fu (傅童成), Meng Li (李蒙), Moritz von Cossel, Grant Campbell, Pete Smith, Yasir Iqbal, Zili Yi (易自力), Shuai Xue (薛帅)
{"title":"Long-Term Cultivation of Perennial Energy Crops Enhance Ecosystem Multifunctionality on Marginal Red Soil Without Trade-Offs","authors":"Yini Wu (伍旖旎), Yi Xu (许依), Tongcheng Fu (傅童成), Meng Li (李蒙), Moritz von Cossel, Grant Campbell, Pete Smith, Yasir Iqbal, Zili Yi (易自力), Shuai Xue (薛帅)","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Perennial energy crops (PECs) are increasingly being recommended for cultivation on marginal lands to support the bioeconomy and promote soil restoration, owing to their low input requirements and large potential for soil organic carbon sequestration. However, the effects of the cultivation of PECs on the trade-offs or synergies among soil functions, and consequently on ecosystem multifunctionality (EMF), remain unclear, hindering large-scale adoption. We conducted our measurements in a long-term field experiment that was established a decade ago, where <i>Miscanthus</i> and switchgrass were cultivated alongside a native C<sub>3</sub> grass mixture (<i>Cyperus rotundus</i> L. and <i>Setaria viridis</i> L.) as reference to assess the effects of PECs on soil multifunctionality. We assessed 10 ecosystem functions grouped into provisioning, supporting, and regulating services. The results demonstrate that <i>Miscanthus</i> and switchgrass cultivation elevated the overall EMF by an average of 5.29-fold over the C<sub>3</sub> native grass control, with supporting, regulating, and provisioning services increasing by 2.08, 7.27, and 43.98-fold, respectively. Specifically, the two PECs improved all 10 measured soil functions, with the exception of abiotic stress regulation under switchgrass cultivation. <i>Miscanthus</i> outperformed switchgrass by 41.54% in supporting services and 81.09% in provisioning services, resulting in higher EMF. Moreover, strong positive relationships were observed among the three service categories, indicating that the cultivation of PECs improves EMF consistently without significant trade-offs. These findings suggest that cultivating PECs on marginal land can simultaneously provide sustainable biomass feedstock and enhance soil health, supporting the feasibility for larger-scale deployment.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"18 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70154","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Perennial energy crops (PECs) are increasingly being recommended for cultivation on marginal lands to support the bioeconomy and promote soil restoration, owing to their low input requirements and large potential for soil organic carbon sequestration. However, the effects of the cultivation of PECs on the trade-offs or synergies among soil functions, and consequently on ecosystem multifunctionality (EMF), remain unclear, hindering large-scale adoption. We conducted our measurements in a long-term field experiment that was established a decade ago, where Miscanthus and switchgrass were cultivated alongside a native C3 grass mixture (Cyperus rotundus L. and Setaria viridis L.) as reference to assess the effects of PECs on soil multifunctionality. We assessed 10 ecosystem functions grouped into provisioning, supporting, and regulating services. The results demonstrate that Miscanthus and switchgrass cultivation elevated the overall EMF by an average of 5.29-fold over the C3 native grass control, with supporting, regulating, and provisioning services increasing by 2.08, 7.27, and 43.98-fold, respectively. Specifically, the two PECs improved all 10 measured soil functions, with the exception of abiotic stress regulation under switchgrass cultivation. Miscanthus outperformed switchgrass by 41.54% in supporting services and 81.09% in provisioning services, resulting in higher EMF. Moreover, strong positive relationships were observed among the three service categories, indicating that the cultivation of PECs improves EMF consistently without significant trade-offs. These findings suggest that cultivating PECs on marginal land can simultaneously provide sustainable biomass feedstock and enhance soil health, supporting the feasibility for larger-scale deployment.
期刊介绍:
GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used.
Key areas covered by the journal:
Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis).
Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW).
Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems.
Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy.
Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.