Stephanie Y. Chia, Yu Tsai-Chen, Yi-Ru Cheng, Mao-Ning Tuanmu, William F. Fagan
{"title":"Predation, Climate and Species Traits Interact to Shape Global Patterns of Avian Nest Architecture","authors":"Stephanie Y. Chia, Yu Tsai-Chen, Yi-Ru Cheng, Mao-Ning Tuanmu, William F. Fagan","doi":"10.1111/geb.70265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Bird nest structures are critical for reproductive success and vary widely across species. However, the ecological and evolutionary drivers behind enclosed nests (domes and cavities) remain unclear, with previous studies yielding conflicting results. Leveraging recently available comprehensive nest trait data, we aim to clarify whether enclosed nests primarily function as protection from predation or for regulation of microclimate.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Global.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>Contemporary (environmental data from 1981 to 2010).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>Birds (Aves).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using phylogenetic logistic regression models for 7427 bird species, we examined whether the observed relationships between nest structure and potential environmental drivers and species traits were consistent with the predictions of the two functional hypotheses. To explore potential variations in the function, we built separate models for domes and cavities, as well as for passerines and non-passerines.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Predation risk increases the likelihood of dome use, especially in passerines, where a stronger increase is among the species that are more susceptible to nest predation such as ground-nesting, non-cooperative and larger clutch size species. Climatic effects are more pronounced in cavity nesters, with aridity promoting cavity use among passerines, and both cold and hot temperatures increasing cavity use among small non-passerine species.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Different types of enclosed nests correspond to distinct environmental challenges, with dome nests primarily associated with predation pressure and cavities with adverse climatic conditions. These findings contribute to resolving long-standing debates about the functional significance of enclosed nests and offer insights into the evolution of avian nest structures.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"35 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/geb.70265","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70265","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
Bird nest structures are critical for reproductive success and vary widely across species. However, the ecological and evolutionary drivers behind enclosed nests (domes and cavities) remain unclear, with previous studies yielding conflicting results. Leveraging recently available comprehensive nest trait data, we aim to clarify whether enclosed nests primarily function as protection from predation or for regulation of microclimate.
Location
Global.
Time Period
Contemporary (environmental data from 1981 to 2010).
Major Taxa Studied
Birds (Aves).
Methods
Using phylogenetic logistic regression models for 7427 bird species, we examined whether the observed relationships between nest structure and potential environmental drivers and species traits were consistent with the predictions of the two functional hypotheses. To explore potential variations in the function, we built separate models for domes and cavities, as well as for passerines and non-passerines.
Results
Predation risk increases the likelihood of dome use, especially in passerines, where a stronger increase is among the species that are more susceptible to nest predation such as ground-nesting, non-cooperative and larger clutch size species. Climatic effects are more pronounced in cavity nesters, with aridity promoting cavity use among passerines, and both cold and hot temperatures increasing cavity use among small non-passerine species.
Main Conclusions
Different types of enclosed nests correspond to distinct environmental challenges, with dome nests primarily associated with predation pressure and cavities with adverse climatic conditions. These findings contribute to resolving long-standing debates about the functional significance of enclosed nests and offer insights into the evolution of avian nest structures.
期刊介绍:
Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.