Addressing Uncertainties in Climate–Ecosystem Feedbacks in the Arctic: Ten Priority Research Questions for Integrated Observation and Modeling

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Akira S. Mori, Keita Nishizawa, Shota Masumoto, Ülo Niinemets, Vincent Maire, Xinyu Xu, Shu-Kuan Wong, Kureha F. Suzuki, Joël Bêty, J. Hans C. Cornelissen, Masaki Uchida
{"title":"Addressing Uncertainties in Climate–Ecosystem Feedbacks in the Arctic: Ten Priority Research Questions for Integrated Observation and Modeling","authors":"Akira S. Mori,&nbsp;Keita Nishizawa,&nbsp;Shota Masumoto,&nbsp;Ülo Niinemets,&nbsp;Vincent Maire,&nbsp;Xinyu Xu,&nbsp;Shu-Kuan Wong,&nbsp;Kureha F. Suzuki,&nbsp;Joël Bêty,&nbsp;J. Hans C. Cornelissen,&nbsp;Masaki Uchida","doi":"10.1111/1440-1703.70089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Positive biosphere–climate feedbacks are likely to amplify the Arctic warming, yet major uncertainties persist regarding their magnitude and underlying mechanisms. Vegetation shifts, permafrost thaw, and microbial responses critically influence greenhouse gas emissions, surface albedo, and energy balance, ultimately feeding back to climate change. However, the capacity of emerging and changing Arctic ecosystems to sustain biogeochemical functions remains unclear. Here, we identify ten priority research questions that address vegetation, soil, and hydrological processes most relevant to climate feedback. We argue that simply expanding field observations is insufficient. Instead, monitoring must be strategically designed—aligned with satellite observations and models across scales, structured for causal inference, and integrated within coordinated international ecological networks to ensure comparability and synthesis. Advancing next-generation, policy-relevant observation systems will support more accurate projections of Arctic feedbacks, improve the ecological realism of Earth system models, and guide policy-making. Given the disproportionate role of Arctic ecosystems in the global climate system, developing coordinated and ecologically grounded monitoring strategies is a crucial step toward reducing uncertainties in biosphere–climate interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11434,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Research","volume":"41 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1440-1703.70089","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1703.70089","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Positive biosphere–climate feedbacks are likely to amplify the Arctic warming, yet major uncertainties persist regarding their magnitude and underlying mechanisms. Vegetation shifts, permafrost thaw, and microbial responses critically influence greenhouse gas emissions, surface albedo, and energy balance, ultimately feeding back to climate change. However, the capacity of emerging and changing Arctic ecosystems to sustain biogeochemical functions remains unclear. Here, we identify ten priority research questions that address vegetation, soil, and hydrological processes most relevant to climate feedback. We argue that simply expanding field observations is insufficient. Instead, monitoring must be strategically designed—aligned with satellite observations and models across scales, structured for causal inference, and integrated within coordinated international ecological networks to ensure comparability and synthesis. Advancing next-generation, policy-relevant observation systems will support more accurate projections of Arctic feedbacks, improve the ecological realism of Earth system models, and guide policy-making. Given the disproportionate role of Arctic ecosystems in the global climate system, developing coordinated and ecologically grounded monitoring strategies is a crucial step toward reducing uncertainties in biosphere–climate interactions.

Abstract Image

解决北极气候-生态系统反馈的不确定性:综合观测和模拟的十个优先研究问题
积极的生物圈-气候反馈可能会放大北极变暖,但其幅度和潜在机制仍存在重大不确定性。植被变化、永久冻土融化和微生物响应对温室气体排放、地表反照率和能量平衡产生重大影响,最终反馈给气候变化。然而,新兴和变化的北极生态系统维持生物地球化学功能的能力尚不清楚。在这里,我们确定了十个优先研究问题,这些问题涉及与气候反馈最相关的植被、土壤和水文过程。我们认为,仅仅扩大实地观察是不够的。相反,监测必须在战略上与卫星观测和跨尺度模型相一致,构建因果推理结构,并整合到协调的国际生态网络中,以确保可比性和综合性。推进下一代与政策相关的观测系统将支持对北极反馈的更准确预测,提高地球系统模型的生态现实性,并指导决策。鉴于北极生态系统在全球气候系统中的不成比例的作用,制定协调和生态基础监测战略是减少生物圈-气候相互作用不确定性的关键一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Research
Ecological Research 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
5.6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Research has been published in English by the Ecological Society of Japan since 1986. Ecological Research publishes original papers on all aspects of ecology, in both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书