Y. M. Elattar, M. M. Salem, Ahmed Salama, A. M. El-Wardany
{"title":"Taguchi-based optimization and comparative analysis of filament and direct powder FFF for biomedical UHMWPE composites","authors":"Y. M. Elattar, M. M. Salem, Ahmed Salama, A. M. El-Wardany","doi":"10.1186/s43088-026-00783-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) has become a key additive manufacturing technique for producing biomedical components with complex geometries and reduced material waste. However, the processing of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) remains challenging due to its high melt viscosity and poor interlayer adhesion. This study aims to optimize FFF parameters and evaluate an alternative direct powder extrusion approach for UHMWPE composites reinforced with hydroxyapatite (HAP) and titanium dioxide (TiO₂).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A low-cost, single-screw filament extruder was developed in-house to fabricate UHMWPE/HAP/TiO₂ filaments for conventional FFF printing. The same extruder was later modified to operate as a direct powder extrusion head, eliminating the filament fabrication step. A Taguchi L<sub>16</sub> orthogonal array was used to optimize four key process parameters (extrusion temperature, bed temperature, infill percentage, and number of outer perimeters) with ultimate tensile strength (UTS) as the response variable. ANOVA and signal-to-noise ratio analyses were employed to determine parameter significance. Subsequently, a second-order polynomial regression model was developed based on the experimental dataset to predict UTS as a function of the dominant FFF parameters, effectively capturing the non-linear behavior of the process. Extrusion temperature and infill percentage were identified as the most influential parameters affecting tensile strength. The refined regression model demonstrated robust predictive reliability, achieving an adjusted <span>\\(\\:{R}^{2}\\)</span> of 75.04% and a predictive <span>\\(\\:{R}^{2}\\)</span> of 66.38%, ensuring its suitability for process optimization. Comparative mechanical testing showed that direct powder-printed samples achieved a maximum UTS of 50.15 MPa, nearly identical to filament-based prints, confirming the feasibility of direct extrusion for UHMWPE composites.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The study establishes a cost-effective route for manufacturing biomedical-grade UHMWPE composites, demonstrating that direct powder extrusion (DPE) is a viable, high-performance alternative to filament-based FFF. The results identify infill percentage and the quadratic effect of perimeters as the most critical factors influencing mechanical integrity. The validated second-order model provides a reliable framework for reaching a peak UTS of 50.15 MPa, effectively bridging the gap between low-cost fabrication and industrial-grade performance. These findings establish a foundation for advancing bio-additive manufacturing of orthopedic components through simplified, low-degradation processing stages.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":481,"journal":{"name":"Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s43088-026-00783-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s43088-026-00783-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) has become a key additive manufacturing technique for producing biomedical components with complex geometries and reduced material waste. However, the processing of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) remains challenging due to its high melt viscosity and poor interlayer adhesion. This study aims to optimize FFF parameters and evaluate an alternative direct powder extrusion approach for UHMWPE composites reinforced with hydroxyapatite (HAP) and titanium dioxide (TiO₂).
Methods
A low-cost, single-screw filament extruder was developed in-house to fabricate UHMWPE/HAP/TiO₂ filaments for conventional FFF printing. The same extruder was later modified to operate as a direct powder extrusion head, eliminating the filament fabrication step. A Taguchi L16 orthogonal array was used to optimize four key process parameters (extrusion temperature, bed temperature, infill percentage, and number of outer perimeters) with ultimate tensile strength (UTS) as the response variable. ANOVA and signal-to-noise ratio analyses were employed to determine parameter significance. Subsequently, a second-order polynomial regression model was developed based on the experimental dataset to predict UTS as a function of the dominant FFF parameters, effectively capturing the non-linear behavior of the process. Extrusion temperature and infill percentage were identified as the most influential parameters affecting tensile strength. The refined regression model demonstrated robust predictive reliability, achieving an adjusted \(\:{R}^{2}\) of 75.04% and a predictive \(\:{R}^{2}\) of 66.38%, ensuring its suitability for process optimization. Comparative mechanical testing showed that direct powder-printed samples achieved a maximum UTS of 50.15 MPa, nearly identical to filament-based prints, confirming the feasibility of direct extrusion for UHMWPE composites.
Conclusions
The study establishes a cost-effective route for manufacturing biomedical-grade UHMWPE composites, demonstrating that direct powder extrusion (DPE) is a viable, high-performance alternative to filament-based FFF. The results identify infill percentage and the quadratic effect of perimeters as the most critical factors influencing mechanical integrity. The validated second-order model provides a reliable framework for reaching a peak UTS of 50.15 MPa, effectively bridging the gap between low-cost fabrication and industrial-grade performance. These findings establish a foundation for advancing bio-additive manufacturing of orthopedic components through simplified, low-degradation processing stages.
熔融长丝制造(FFF)已成为生产具有复杂几何形状和减少材料浪费的生物医学部件的关键增材制造技术。然而,超高分子量聚乙烯(UHMWPE)的加工仍然具有挑战性,因为它的熔体粘度高,层间附着力差。本研究旨在优化FFF参数,并对羟基磷灰石(HAP)和二氧化钛(TiO 2)增强超高分子量聚乙烯(UHMWPE)复合材料的直接粉末挤压方法进行评价。方法自行研制了一种低成本的单螺杆挤出机,用于制备常规FFF打印用UHMWPE/HAP/TiO 2长丝。同一挤出机后来被修改为直接粉末挤出头,消除了长丝制造步骤。以极限拉伸强度(UTS)为响应变量,采用田口L16正交法对挤压温度、床层温度、填充率、外周数4个关键工艺参数进行优化。采用方差分析和信噪比分析确定参数的显著性。随后,基于实验数据集开发了二阶多项式回归模型,以预测UTS作为主要FFF参数的函数,有效地捕获了过程的非线性行为。挤出温度和填充率是影响拉伸强度的主要参数。精细化回归模型具有稳健的预测信度,调整后\(\:{R}^{2}\)为75.04% and a predictive \(\:{R}^{2}\) of 66.38%, ensuring its suitability for process optimization. Comparative mechanical testing showed that direct powder-printed samples achieved a maximum UTS of 50.15 MPa, nearly identical to filament-based prints, confirming the feasibility of direct extrusion for UHMWPE composites.ConclusionsThe study establishes a cost-effective route for manufacturing biomedical-grade UHMWPE composites, demonstrating that direct powder extrusion (DPE) is a viable, high-performance alternative to filament-based FFF. The results identify infill percentage and the quadratic effect of perimeters as the most critical factors influencing mechanical integrity. The validated second-order model provides a reliable framework for reaching a peak UTS of 50.15 MPa, effectively bridging the gap between low-cost fabrication and industrial-grade performance. These findings establish a foundation for advancing bio-additive manufacturing of orthopedic components through simplified, low-degradation processing stages.
期刊介绍:
Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences (BJBAS) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal. This journal welcomes submissions of original research, literature reviews, and editorials in its respected fields of fundamental science, applied science (with a particular focus on the fields of applied nanotechnology and biotechnology), medical sciences, pharmaceutical sciences, and engineering. The multidisciplinary aspects of the journal encourage global collaboration between researchers in multiple fields and provide cross-disciplinary dissemination of findings.