{"title":"Renal Outcomes in HBsAg-Positive Living Kidney Donors: A Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"Xia Huang, Saifu Yin, Tao Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2026.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The utilization of hepatitis B surface antigen-positive (HBsAg+) living kidney donors is a strategy to expand the donor pool. However, concerns regarding their renal safety after nephrectomy persist due to the potential impact of chronic HBV infection on the solitary kidney.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 415 living kidney donors, including 31 (7.5%) who were HBsAg+. Donors were followed for a mean duration of 46.81 months (HBsAg+ group) and 42.10 months (HBsAg- group). The primary outcome was the change in renal function, assessed by serum creatinine levels and the incidence of an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) below 45 mL/min/1.73m². Multivariable linear regression was used to identify factors associated with post-donation renal function change.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Baseline characteristics were comparable. At the last follow-up, there was no significant difference in serum creatinine between HBsAg+ and HBsAg- donors (81.65 µmol/L vs. 81.64 µmol/L, <em>p</em> = .996). The increase in creatinine from baseline was slightly greater in the HBsAg+ group (12.53 µmol/L vs. 11.08 µmol/L), but this difference was not statistically significant (<em>p</em> = .060). The incidence of low eGFR (<45 mL/min/1.73m²) was low in both groups (3.2% vs. 0.5%, <em>p</em> = .543), with no cases of end-stage kidney disease. Multivariable analysis confirmed that HBsAg+ status was not an independent predictor of serum creatinine increase (Estimate 1.42, 95% CI: -0.16 to 3.01; <em>p</em> = .078), whereas hypertension (Estimate 1.89, <em>p</em> = .039) and diabetes (Estimate 3.28, <em>p</em> = .016) were significant predictors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Over an intermediate-term follow-up, carefully selected HBsAg+ living kidney donors did not exhibit a significantly higher risk of renal impairment compared to HBsAg- donors. HBsAg positivity itself was not an independent risk factor for renal function decline.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":"58 6","pages":"Pages 1022-1026"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134526002964","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The utilization of hepatitis B surface antigen-positive (HBsAg+) living kidney donors is a strategy to expand the donor pool. However, concerns regarding their renal safety after nephrectomy persist due to the potential impact of chronic HBV infection on the solitary kidney.
Methods
In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 415 living kidney donors, including 31 (7.5%) who were HBsAg+. Donors were followed for a mean duration of 46.81 months (HBsAg+ group) and 42.10 months (HBsAg- group). The primary outcome was the change in renal function, assessed by serum creatinine levels and the incidence of an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) below 45 mL/min/1.73m². Multivariable linear regression was used to identify factors associated with post-donation renal function change.
Results
Baseline characteristics were comparable. At the last follow-up, there was no significant difference in serum creatinine between HBsAg+ and HBsAg- donors (81.65 µmol/L vs. 81.64 µmol/L, p = .996). The increase in creatinine from baseline was slightly greater in the HBsAg+ group (12.53 µmol/L vs. 11.08 µmol/L), but this difference was not statistically significant (p = .060). The incidence of low eGFR (<45 mL/min/1.73m²) was low in both groups (3.2% vs. 0.5%, p = .543), with no cases of end-stage kidney disease. Multivariable analysis confirmed that HBsAg+ status was not an independent predictor of serum creatinine increase (Estimate 1.42, 95% CI: -0.16 to 3.01; p = .078), whereas hypertension (Estimate 1.89, p = .039) and diabetes (Estimate 3.28, p = .016) were significant predictors.
Conclusion
Over an intermediate-term follow-up, carefully selected HBsAg+ living kidney donors did not exhibit a significantly higher risk of renal impairment compared to HBsAg- donors. HBsAg positivity itself was not an independent risk factor for renal function decline.
背景:利用乙型肝炎表面抗原阳性(HBsAg+)活体肾供者是扩大供者池的一种策略。然而,由于慢性HBV感染对孤立肾的潜在影响,对其肾切除术后肾脏安全性的担忧仍然存在。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们分析了415例活体肾供者,其中31例(7.5%)为HBsAg+。供者平均随访46.81个月(HBsAg+组)和42.10个月(HBsAg-组)。主要结局是肾功能的改变,通过血清肌酐水平和肾小球滤过率(eGFR)低于45 mL/min/1.73m²的发生率来评估。采用多变量线性回归确定与捐献后肾功能改变相关的因素。结果:基线特征可比较。最后一次随访时,HBsAg+供者和HBsAg-供者血清肌酐差异无统计学意义(81.65µmol/L vs. 81.64µmol/L, p = 0.996)。与基线相比,HBsAg+组肌酐升高幅度略大(12.53µmol/L vs. 11.08µmol/L),但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.060)。结论:在中期随访中,精心挑选的HBsAg+活体肾脏供者与HBsAg-供者相比,并未表现出明显更高的肾损害风险。HBsAg阳性本身并不是肾功能下降的独立危险因素。
期刊介绍:
Transplantation Proceedings publishes several different categories of manuscripts, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication.
The first type of manuscripts consists of sets of papers providing an in-depth expression of the current state of the art in various rapidly developing components of world transplantation biology and medicine. These manuscripts emanate from congresses of the affiliated transplantation societies, from Symposia sponsored by the Societies, as well as special Conferences and Workshops covering related topics.
Transplantation Proceedings also publishes several special sections including publication of Clinical Transplantation Proceedings, being rapid original contributions of preclinical and clinical experiences. These manuscripts undergo review by members of the Editorial Board.
Original basic or clinical science articles, clinical trials and case studies can be submitted to the journal?s open access companion title Transplantation Reports.