Is the Microbial Status an Extrinsic, Intrinsic, or Intermediate Influence on Experimental Animals?

Laurentiu Benga, Anna Rehm, Christina Gougoula, Sabine Bischoff, Stefan Janssen
{"title":"Is the Microbial Status an Extrinsic, Intrinsic, or Intermediate Influence on Experimental Animals?","authors":"Laurentiu Benga, Anna Rehm, Christina Gougoula, Sabine Bischoff, Stefan Janssen","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-26-036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Living entities, inlcuding laboratory animals, are composed of the host and its associated microbial communities and defined as holobionts. The host genotype and its microbiome drive together as a metagenome, the holobiont phenotype, with the microbiome itself as a well-recognized source of phenotypic variation. Multiple environmental (diet, light/dark cycles, etc.) as well as host-related factors (genotype, maternal effect, etc.) not only influence the animal experimental phenotype but also contribute to the shaping of the microbiome, raising the question of whether the microbiome of experimental animals represents an extrinsic, intrinsic, or intermediate influence. Currently, there is sufficient evidence that microbial communities at different body sites are shaped by distinct endogenous and exogenous factors, indicating that the host does not leave its microbial status to chance but instead actively modulates it through host-specific mechanisms, despite extrinsic influences. This leads to a microbiome that reflects a 'fingerprint' of its own endogenous and exogenous influences. This suggests that the microbiome of experimental animals is an intermediate factor with both intrinsic and extrinsic components and underscores the importance of refining the selection of the appropriate metagenome for each specific rodent experiment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-26-036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Living entities, inlcuding laboratory animals, are composed of the host and its associated microbial communities and defined as holobionts. The host genotype and its microbiome drive together as a metagenome, the holobiont phenotype, with the microbiome itself as a well-recognized source of phenotypic variation. Multiple environmental (diet, light/dark cycles, etc.) as well as host-related factors (genotype, maternal effect, etc.) not only influence the animal experimental phenotype but also contribute to the shaping of the microbiome, raising the question of whether the microbiome of experimental animals represents an extrinsic, intrinsic, or intermediate influence. Currently, there is sufficient evidence that microbial communities at different body sites are shaped by distinct endogenous and exogenous factors, indicating that the host does not leave its microbial status to chance but instead actively modulates it through host-specific mechanisms, despite extrinsic influences. This leads to a microbiome that reflects a 'fingerprint' of its own endogenous and exogenous influences. This suggests that the microbiome of experimental animals is an intermediate factor with both intrinsic and extrinsic components and underscores the importance of refining the selection of the appropriate metagenome for each specific rodent experiment.

微生物状态对实验动物的影响是外在的、内在的还是中间的?
包括实验动物在内的生物实体由宿主及其相关的微生物群落组成,并被定义为全息生物。宿主基因型及其微生物组共同驱动形成宏基因组,即整体表型,而微生物组本身是表型变异的公认来源。多种环境(饮食、光照/黑暗周期等)以及宿主相关因素(基因型、母系效应等)不仅影响动物的实验表型,还有助于微生物组的形成,这就提出了实验动物的微生物组是外在、内在还是中间影响的问题。目前,有足够的证据表明,不同身体部位的微生物群落是由不同的内源性和外源性因素形成的,这表明宿主不会让其微生物状态随机变化,而是通过宿主特异性机制积极调节它,尽管有外部影响。这导致微生物组反映了其自身内源性和外源性影响的“指纹”。这表明实验动物的微生物组是一个具有内在和外在成分的中间因素,并强调了为每个特定的啮齿动物实验精炼选择适当的宏基因组的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书