Evaluation of physicomechanical and optical properties of bioactive glass (BAG)-filled resin composites: an in vitro study.

Biomaterial investigations in dentistry Pub Date : 2026-06-15 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2340/biid.v13.46233
Yan Victor Silva de Santana, Emanuel Ewerton Mendonça Vasconcelos, Gabriela Queiroz de Melo Monteiro, Agna Roberta Xavier Bezerra, Luís Felipe Espíndola-Castro
{"title":"Evaluation of physicomechanical and optical properties of bioactive glass (BAG)-filled resin composites: an <i>in vitro</i> study.","authors":"Yan Victor Silva de Santana, Emanuel Ewerton Mendonça Vasconcelos, Gabriela Queiroz de Melo Monteiro, Agna Roberta Xavier Bezerra, Luís Felipe Espíndola-Castro","doi":"10.2340/biid.v13.46233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the behavior of bioactive glass (BAG)-filled resin composites (Beautifil II / Shofu-BR and Beautifil Flow Plus / Shofu-BF) compared with conventional resin composites (Filtek Z350 XT / Solventum-ZR and Filtek Supreme Flowable Restorative / Solventum-FS) by means of microhardness, sorption, solubility, and color stability tests.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>For these analyses, ten specimens were fabricated per group using a split metal mold (15 mm in diameter × 1 mm thickness). Microhardness (<i>n</i> = 10) was measured using a digital microhardness tester, based on the mean of three indentations per specimen under a 2.94 N load for 15 s. For the sorption and solubility tests, five out of the 10 specimens used in the microhardness assays were randomly selected (<i>n</i> = 5), and ISO 4049/2019 recommendations were followed. Color stability was assessed using a digital spectrophotometer by comparing specimens immersed in coffee (using the five specimens not selected for the sorption and solubility tests / <i>n</i> = 5) and distilled water (control, using the same specimens from the sorption and solubility tests), with measurements obtained at baseline, after 1 day, and after 1 week of immersion. Color change (ΔE) was calculated using CIELAB parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For microhardness, the high-viscosity resin composites (ZR and BR) showed significantly higher mean values than their low-viscosity versions (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Although sorption differed significantly among groups (<i>p</i> = 0.001), all resin composites exhibited values within the limits established by ISO 4049/2019. No statistically significant differences were observed for solubility. Regarding color stability, after 7 days in coffee, BR and ZR exhibited the greatest color changes (ΔE). Despite the observed statistical differences, the changes remained within acceptable clinical limits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BAG-filled resin composites exhibit properties comparable to those of conventional resin composites. The ZR resin composite showed higher microhardness; however, for the other evaluated parameters (sorption, solubility, and color stability in coffee), the tested resin composites exhibited values within the limits recommended by ISO 4049:2019 and were comparable to those of the reference conventional high- or low-viscosity resin composite.</p>","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":"65 ","pages":"46233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13273812/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v13.46233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the behavior of bioactive glass (BAG)-filled resin composites (Beautifil II / Shofu-BR and Beautifil Flow Plus / Shofu-BF) compared with conventional resin composites (Filtek Z350 XT / Solventum-ZR and Filtek Supreme Flowable Restorative / Solventum-FS) by means of microhardness, sorption, solubility, and color stability tests.

Materials and methods: For these analyses, ten specimens were fabricated per group using a split metal mold (15 mm in diameter × 1 mm thickness). Microhardness (n = 10) was measured using a digital microhardness tester, based on the mean of three indentations per specimen under a 2.94 N load for 15 s. For the sorption and solubility tests, five out of the 10 specimens used in the microhardness assays were randomly selected (n = 5), and ISO 4049/2019 recommendations were followed. Color stability was assessed using a digital spectrophotometer by comparing specimens immersed in coffee (using the five specimens not selected for the sorption and solubility tests / n = 5) and distilled water (control, using the same specimens from the sorption and solubility tests), with measurements obtained at baseline, after 1 day, and after 1 week of immersion. Color change (ΔE) was calculated using CIELAB parameters.

Results: For microhardness, the high-viscosity resin composites (ZR and BR) showed significantly higher mean values than their low-viscosity versions (p < 0.001). Although sorption differed significantly among groups (p = 0.001), all resin composites exhibited values within the limits established by ISO 4049/2019. No statistically significant differences were observed for solubility. Regarding color stability, after 7 days in coffee, BR and ZR exhibited the greatest color changes (ΔE). Despite the observed statistical differences, the changes remained within acceptable clinical limits.

Conclusion: BAG-filled resin composites exhibit properties comparable to those of conventional resin composites. The ZR resin composite showed higher microhardness; however, for the other evaluated parameters (sorption, solubility, and color stability in coffee), the tested resin composites exhibited values within the limits recommended by ISO 4049:2019 and were comparable to those of the reference conventional high- or low-viscosity resin composite.

生物活性玻璃(BAG)填充树脂复合材料的物理力学和光学性能评价:体外研究。
目的:通过显微硬度、吸附、溶解度和颜色稳定性测试,比较生物活性玻璃(BAG)填充树脂复合材料(Beautifil II / Shofu-BR和Beautifil Flow Plus / Shofu-BF)与常规树脂复合材料(Filtek Z350 XT / Solventum-ZR和Filtek Supreme Flowable Restorative / Solventum-FS)的性能。材料和方法:为了进行这些分析,每组10个样品使用金属分裂模具(直径15 mm × 1 mm厚)。显微硬度(n = 10)使用数字显微硬度计测量,基于每个试样在2.94 n载荷下15 s下的三个压痕的平均值。在吸附和溶解度测试中,从用于显微硬度测定的10个样品中随机选择5个(n = 5),并遵循ISO 4049/2019建议。通过比较浸泡在咖啡(使用未选择用于吸附和溶解度测试的5个样品/ n = 5)和蒸馏水(对照,使用来自吸附和溶解度测试的相同样品)中的样品,使用数字分光光度计评估颜色稳定性,并在基线、浸泡1天后和浸泡1周后获得测量结果。颜色变化(ΔE)采用CIELAB参数计算。结果:在显微硬度方面,高粘度树脂复合材料(ZR和BR)的平均值明显高于低粘度树脂复合材料(p < 0.001)。尽管不同组之间的吸收率差异显著(p = 0.001),但所有树脂复合材料的吸收率都在ISO 4049/2019规定的范围内。溶解度差异无统计学意义。关于颜色稳定性,在咖啡中放置7天后,BR和ZR的颜色变化最大(ΔE)。尽管观察到统计学上的差异,但这些变化仍在可接受的临床范围内。结论:袋填充树脂复合材料具有与常规树脂复合材料相当的性能。ZR树脂复合材料具有较高的显微硬度;然而,对于其他评估参数(咖啡中的吸附性、溶解度和颜色稳定性),测试的树脂复合材料的值在ISO 4049:2019推荐的范围内,并且与参考的传统高粘度或低粘度树脂复合材料相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书