Stakeholder perceptions of gaps in antimicrobial resistance mitigation: a multinational multisectoral survey to inform prioritization of One Health interventions.

Godwin Pius Ohemu, Howard Rodriguez-Mori, Marcelo Schmidt, Babafela Awosile
{"title":"Stakeholder perceptions of gaps in antimicrobial resistance mitigation: a multinational multisectoral survey to inform prioritization of One Health interventions.","authors":"Godwin Pius Ohemu, Howard Rodriguez-Mori, Marcelo Schmidt, Babafela Awosile","doi":"10.1017/ash.2026.10750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined stakeholder perceptions of gaps in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) mitigation efforts across different sectors and career stages, with the goal of generating insights to support prioritization of One Health interventions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey of AMR stakeholders using a structured questionnaire between October and November 2025. Stakeholders were recruited through international networks across 33 countries on 5 continents. Respondents listed the top three areas in AMR mitigation efforts that they perceived as receiving insufficient attention but require greater focus to reduce the emergence and spread of drug-resistant bacterial infections. We performed thematic analysis, calculated weighted priority scores, conducted an Impact-Effort Matrix analysis, and applied Fisher's exact tests to examine associations between themes, professional sector and career stages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 103 respondents, participants spanned nine professional sectors and four career stages. Antimicrobial stewardship (18.8%, weighted score 119) and Environmental AMR and Waste (16.5%, weighted score 108) were the most frequently cited perceived gaps. Impact-Effort Matrix analysis identified four priority areas as Quick Wins (stewardship, IPC, surveillance, and animal health, accounting for 45.7% of impact), two Major Projects (environmental AMR, R&D), three Fill-ins (awareness, One Health, other/cross-cutting), and three Hard Slogs (access, financing, policy). No significant associations were observed between perceived mitigation gaps across professional sector and career stages.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The emphasis on antimicrobial stewardship among stakeholders highlights a perceived disconnect between stewardship policy adoption and on-the-ground practice. The Impact-Effort Matrix provides a decision-support tool that may assist policymakers and funders in prioritizing One Health interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":"6 1","pages":"e174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13273150/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2026.10750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study examined stakeholder perceptions of gaps in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) mitigation efforts across different sectors and career stages, with the goal of generating insights to support prioritization of One Health interventions.

Method: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of AMR stakeholders using a structured questionnaire between October and November 2025. Stakeholders were recruited through international networks across 33 countries on 5 continents. Respondents listed the top three areas in AMR mitigation efforts that they perceived as receiving insufficient attention but require greater focus to reduce the emergence and spread of drug-resistant bacterial infections. We performed thematic analysis, calculated weighted priority scores, conducted an Impact-Effort Matrix analysis, and applied Fisher's exact tests to examine associations between themes, professional sector and career stages.

Results: Among 103 respondents, participants spanned nine professional sectors and four career stages. Antimicrobial stewardship (18.8%, weighted score 119) and Environmental AMR and Waste (16.5%, weighted score 108) were the most frequently cited perceived gaps. Impact-Effort Matrix analysis identified four priority areas as Quick Wins (stewardship, IPC, surveillance, and animal health, accounting for 45.7% of impact), two Major Projects (environmental AMR, R&D), three Fill-ins (awareness, One Health, other/cross-cutting), and three Hard Slogs (access, financing, policy). No significant associations were observed between perceived mitigation gaps across professional sector and career stages.

Conclusions: The emphasis on antimicrobial stewardship among stakeholders highlights a perceived disconnect between stewardship policy adoption and on-the-ground practice. The Impact-Effort Matrix provides a decision-support tool that may assist policymakers and funders in prioritizing One Health interventions.

利益攸关方对减少抗菌素耐药性方面差距的看法:为确定“同一健康”干预措施的优先次序提供信息的多国多部门调查。
目的:本研究调查了不同部门和职业阶段的利益相关者对抗菌素耐药性(AMR)缓解工作差距的看法,目的是产生见解,以支持“同一健康”干预措施的优先次序。方法:我们在2025年10月至11月期间使用结构化问卷对AMR利益相关者进行了横断面调查。利益相关者是通过遍布五大洲33个国家的国际网络招募的。答复者列出了他们认为没有得到足够重视但需要更多关注以减少耐药细菌感染的出现和传播的前三个抗菌素耐药性缓解工作领域。我们进行了主题分析,计算了加权优先级分数,进行了影响-努力矩阵分析,并应用Fisher的精确检验来检验主题、专业部门和职业阶段之间的关联。结果:在103名受访者中,参与者跨越了9个专业领域和4个职业阶段。抗菌药物管理(18.8%,加权得分119)和环境抗生素耐药性和废物(16.5%,加权得分108)是最常被提及的感知差距。影响-努力矩阵分析确定了四个优先领域:速效(管理、IPC、监测和动物卫生,占影响的45.7%)、两个主要项目(环境抗菌素耐药性、研发)、三个填表项目(意识、一种健康、其他/交叉领域)和三个硬任务(获取、融资、政策)。在专业部门和职业阶段的感知缓解差距之间没有观察到显著关联。结论:利益相关者对抗菌药物管理的重视凸显了管理政策采纳与实地实践之间的脱节。影响-努力矩阵提供了一个决策支持工具,可帮助决策者和资助者确定“一种健康”干预措施的优先次序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书