Cecilia Li, Madeline Schultze, Carissa Tedeschi, Alex Rock, Eric Gillett, Alyssa Letourneau, Tiffany Wu
{"title":"Outcomes of early oral antibiotic transition for the treatment of uncomplicated enterococcal bacteremia.","authors":"Cecilia Li, Madeline Schultze, Carissa Tedeschi, Alex Rock, Eric Gillett, Alyssa Letourneau, Tiffany Wu","doi":"10.1017/ash.2026.10746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare clinical outcomes in adults with uncomplicated enterococcal bacteremia treated with intravenous (IV) therapy alone versus an early oral (PO) transition and evaluate treatment characteristics and safety outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study between January 1, 2021, and August 1, 2024. The primary outcome was clinical cure at 90 days after antibiotic completion. Secondary outcomes included treatment failure, infection-related readmission, hospital length of stay (HLOS), and 90-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital, two tertiary care centers in Boston, MA.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult patients with at least one positive blood culture with <i>Enterococcus</i> spp. Patients were excluded if they had polymicrobial or persistent bacteremia, invasive infection, incomplete source control, died before completing therapy, or received fewer than 7 days of antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>209 patients were included, of which 119 received IV therapy alone and 90 underwent early PO transition. Gastrointestinal (41.6%) and genitourinary (32.1%) sources were most common, and 86 patients (41.1%) had immunocompromising conditions. Clinical cure was similar between the IV and early PO transition groups (73.9% vs 82.2%; <i>P</i> = .156), with no significant differences in secondary and safety outcomes. HLOS was significantly shorter in the early PO transition group (9 days vs 20 days; <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early PO transition appears to be a safe and effective strategy for uncomplicated enterococcal bacteremia and was associated with reduced HLOS.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":"6 1","pages":"e177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13273157/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2026.10746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To compare clinical outcomes in adults with uncomplicated enterococcal bacteremia treated with intravenous (IV) therapy alone versus an early oral (PO) transition and evaluate treatment characteristics and safety outcomes.
Design: Retrospective cohort study between January 1, 2021, and August 1, 2024. The primary outcome was clinical cure at 90 days after antibiotic completion. Secondary outcomes included treatment failure, infection-related readmission, hospital length of stay (HLOS), and 90-day mortality.
Setting: Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital, two tertiary care centers in Boston, MA.
Patients: Adult patients with at least one positive blood culture with Enterococcus spp. Patients were excluded if they had polymicrobial or persistent bacteremia, invasive infection, incomplete source control, died before completing therapy, or received fewer than 7 days of antibiotics.
Results: 209 patients were included, of which 119 received IV therapy alone and 90 underwent early PO transition. Gastrointestinal (41.6%) and genitourinary (32.1%) sources were most common, and 86 patients (41.1%) had immunocompromising conditions. Clinical cure was similar between the IV and early PO transition groups (73.9% vs 82.2%; P = .156), with no significant differences in secondary and safety outcomes. HLOS was significantly shorter in the early PO transition group (9 days vs 20 days; P < .001).
Conclusion: Early PO transition appears to be a safe and effective strategy for uncomplicated enterococcal bacteremia and was associated with reduced HLOS.
目的:比较单纯静脉(IV)治疗与早期口服(PO)过渡治疗成人无并发症肠球菌菌血症的临床结果,并评估治疗特点和安全性结果。设计:2021年1月1日至2024年8月1日的回顾性队列研究。主要终点是抗生素停用后90天临床治愈。次要结局包括治疗失败、感染相关再入院、住院时间(HLOS)和90天死亡率。环境:马萨诸塞州总医院和布里格姆妇女医院,位于马萨诸塞州波士顿的两家三级医疗中心。患者:至少有一项肠球菌血培养阳性的成人患者,如果有多微生物或持续性菌血症、侵袭性感染、源控制不完全、完成治疗前死亡或使用抗生素少于7天,则排除患者。结果:共纳入209例患者,其中单独静脉注射119例,早期PO过渡90例。胃肠道(41.6%)和泌尿生殖系统(32.1%)最常见,86例患者(41.1%)有免疫功能低下。IV组和早期PO过渡组的临床治愈率相似(73.9% vs 82.2%; P = 0.156),次要结局和安全性结局无显著差异。早期PO过渡组HLOS明显缩短(9天vs 20天;P < 0.001)。结论:对于无并发症的肠球菌菌血症,早期PO转移似乎是一种安全有效的策略,并与HLOS降低有关。